Yardbarker
x

Two of the most prominent esports titles globally, League of Legends and VALORANT, are currently managed by Riot Games. Despite this success, the company frequently encounters significant scheduling conflicts, particularly within its European league, the LEC. Due to this situation, dedicated fans have been pushed to voice a critical question: why does an emerging esports like VALORANT consistently seem to receive scheduling priority over the deeply established League of Legends scene?

One Studio, Two Games, Endless Bickering

Following a widely discussed Reddit post, the debate surrounding the LEC’s scheduling conflicts has intensified. In the post, a fan openly criticized Riot Games for its apparent lack of a coherent strategy to manage these scheduling clashes. Furthermore, the author compared the current predicament to the earlier era of the NA and EU LCS. Specifically, the latter would force European viewers to adapt their entire schedules around North American broadcast times. According to the user, Riot should have invested in separate dedicated studios for each game from the outset.

To prove a point, the individual rhetorically asked if anyone could imagine a major tennis tournament being rescheduled simply because the same arena was needed for a paddleball event that weekend. Riot’s recent decision to schedule two LEC matches from the fourth week of the regional split on a Tuesday, August 26th, originally sparked the core of the controversy. So, what makes this move highly unusual? The LEC traditionally broadcasts its matches on Saturdays, Sundays, and Mondays, thereby catching its audience completely off guard and disrupting their established viewing routines.

LEC Fans to VALORANT: Get Off Our Lawn

However, Riot noted that this sudden schedule shift had a clear operational reason for being implemented. Located in Berlin, the company’s EMEA Esports Headquarters studio is a shared facility that hosts both VALORANT and League of Legends events. That same studio was required to host the much larger VCT EMEA Stage Two finals on the upcoming weekend of August 30th and 31st. Notably, any major championship finals event necessitates extensive technical setup and preparation, which is why the studio required the preceding days to be completely clear.

As a result, it makes logical sense for a high-stakes finals event to take precedence over a regular-season split game for access to the premier broadcasting facility. While the company’s operational needs may justify this process in most cases, Riot’s choice to prioritize VALORANT has been poorly received by a large segment of the LEC audience. Particularly, those disapproving of this decision simply don’t want their preferred matches moved to inconvenient weekdays.

A Clash of Calendars in the Heart of EMEA

Beyond these arguments, some community members escalated the discussion by making direct, and often unnecessarily harsh, comparisons between the two games. To certain League of Legends fans, VALORANT is still a nascent title, while their favorite MOBA continues to reign as the world’s most popular PC esport. Moreover, several commentators within the Reddit thread have even asserted that VALORANT‘s viewership statistics indicate a complete stagnation in growth.

Ultimately, this decline has led many to ask one question: Why would Riot allocate so many resources to its success? Highly generalized and uninformed comments have garnered surprising levels of support, revealing a deep-seated bias. These claims include that VALORANT will never surpass Counter-Strike in popularity and that its professional players are merely second-tier rejects from other shooters. Still, supporters of VALORANT were quick to mount a defense, with one fan pointing out that the company has only moved a handful of LEC games to accommodate the VCT schedule during the entire year.

Additionally, to avoid interfering with the LEC’s weekend time slots, the fan highlighted that VCT EMEA matches are deliberately scheduled for Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays. They then reminded critics that the conflict was between a regular-season LEC week and the VCT EMEA playoffs and championship qualification matches. Therefore, what genuine argument can properly prove that prioritizing the latter is an unreasonable decision?

Fans Cry Foul Over VALORANT‘s Perceived Priority

Although League of Legends remains the superior esports in terms of pure viewership numbers, VALORANT consistently ranks as the fifth most-watched esports globally, according to data from Esports Charts. Due to VALORANT‘s success, it solidified its position as a major title. For Riot’s overall benefit, the careful balance of both communities is a completely justifiable business approach.

That said, fans who demand consistent and reliable scheduling also have a valid perspective. Keep in mind that Riot Games Arena in Berlin was originally constructed as the LEC studio before being transformed into a centralized hub for multiple titles. This has led the League audience to feel a sense of ownership, as they’re justifiably unhappy about ceding their traditional weekend time slots, even if it is temporary.

Hold On, LEC Fans, Help is Coming… Slowly

Additionally, Riot has invested substantial capital into both competitive scenes. That said, the company constructing separate studios or leasing additional external venues may resolve these persistent conflicts. Despite seemingly being an ideal solution, its financial viability is uncertain. However, according to LEC Commissioner Artem Bykov, fans shouldn’t worry too much. He stated that this scheduling conflict will be addressed by 2026, with the company developing a new structural plan designed to minimize these instances of schedule overlapping with VCT. With that, fans of the LEC are offered hope for a more harmonious future.

This article first appeared on Total Apex Gaming and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!