
by Kyle Golik
Is there a quarterback controversy brewing in Austin? Apparently not, as Texas head coach Steve Sarkisian extinguished potential quarterback competition rumors at the Texas National Signing Day press conference where the Longhorns signed the No. 6 class per 247Sports.
Sarkisian answered the question by saying, "Quinn's our starter."
It's hard to fault Sarkisian for sticking with the incumbent, considering Ewers helped guide the Longhorns to their first College Football Playoff berth in program history behind a 69% completion percentage, 3,479 yards, and 22 touchdown passes.
"I don't think that Quinn (Ewers) was a finished product yet. And I think there's plenty of room for growth and improvement in development in his game, going into year three," Sarkisian continued. "I do think his experience, his maturity are all going to be things he can benefit from."
—Steve Sarikisian
In most quarterback circumstances, this wouldn’t be as newsworthy considering how heralded Ewers was out of his prep career and has matured into one of the best quarterback prospects the NFL is eager to have.
What makes this situation different is who is behind Ewers. And that is Arch Manning.
Manning’s prep career at Isidore Newman in New Orleans is well chronicled as he finished as the top overall prospect by 247Sports in the Class of 2023.
247Sports National Recruiting Analyst Cooper Petagna wrote in Manning’s recruiting evaluation that he projected Manning as the next Joe Burrow, "Manning figures to be prepared to make an immediate impact at the next level. Projects as an All-American prospect at the next level with the potential to have his name be one of the first called in the NFL Draft."
That immediate impact Manning was prepared to make in Austin apparently has to wait another year, and it makes me wonder, was our own Mike Farrell off in his assessment of Arch Manning?
Farrell made an appearance on The Daily Wire’s “Crain & Company” podcast, where he made his controversial assessment of Manning, “If his name was Arch Smith, I think he’d be a high three-star quarterback. He plays a very low level of competition. He hasn’t progressed. He had a really good freshman season. I wouldn’t say regression, but he hasn’t progressed, and when he’s had to step up against other competition, especially in the playoff game where he looked awful, it just hasn’t translated.”
Eventually, Farrell elaborated on this assessment in his daily Fact or Fiction column, where he clarified his comments.
“If scouts received film of Arch Manning without his name on it they would rank him as a high 3-star. And then I said with the name, training and the fact that all Manning QBs pan out, I’d have him as a 4 star. I originally had him as a 5-star (see below) but after continued review of QBs in this class and a look at all of them, I’ve changed my mind. But he’s not a 3 star prospect. He’d just be rated that way by everyone if he name was Arch Smith.”
—Mike Farrell
Farrell has since softened his tone, but in a lot of ways, he may have been onto something. Is Arch Manning a quarterback prodigy or simply overrated by his surname?
On the surface, there is only one football and one quarterback who can play at the same time. Me telling you this is akin to telling you the sky is blue.
Texas may indeed have two prodigies in Ewers, who was a prodigy in his own right out of the Class of 2021 as the top prospect in the country, and Manning, and I get how Sarkisian wants to reward his incumbent, but does it go against one of his biggest mentors competitive beliefs.
Sarkisian coached under Pete Carroll at Southern California between 2001 to 2003 as well as from 2005 to 2008, and one of Carroll’s signature trademarks of his program was “Competition Tuesdays.”
Carroll’s philosophy is explained in his book Win Forever, in which he emphasizes a culture where individuals compete against themselves, forcing themselves to stay ahead of the competition around them internally. The external competition wasn’t even in focus because Carroll believed if you had the right players and if they develop the desire to compete, that desire will translate to defeating the competition.
I am not saying Sarkisian doesn’t believe in this or doesn’t embrace the competitive fire Carroll had, or even “The Process” he learned at Alabama under Nick Saban. It does begin to stoke the fires of the notion that Arch Manning was overrated by many recruiting analysts due to the fact that he, in Year 2, cannot push the incumbent Ewers for the job.
Maybe Farrell was right in his claim about Manning. But let's not jump to that conclusion too hastily.
Joe Burrow, who 247Sports' Petagna compared Manning to, wasn’t a prodigy out of the gate. He had to transfer, and after a year in LSU’s system, Burrow clicked and had arguably the finest season a collegiate quarterback ever had and became a legend.
Burrow needed time to develop; maybe Manning needs time as well, and Sarkisian sees that.
Part of the definition of a prodigy is an individual who attains mastery in their field in their youth. In college football, we have seen Trevor Lawrence as a true freshman quarterback Clemson to a national championship, and in doing so, living up to the prodigy label.
To me, Manning isn't a prodigy out of the gate; Burrow wasn't either. But like Burrow, he can develop into a prodigy - the latter half of the definition is something that is extraordinary, something Burrow's 2019 season was.
Manning hopefully is grounded from having family who have achieved the highest of highs in football and will avoid the transfer portal, something my colleague Scott Salomon speculated Manning may do back in November.
We are going to find out Manning's humility as Ewers has been proclaimed the starter heading into the season, but eventually, the reins will be handed to Manning. We will eventually find out if Manning lives up to the five-star Burrow comparison or if he is just Arch Smith.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!