Yardbarker
Yardbarker
x
20 facts you might not know about 'Chicago'
Miramax

20 facts you might not know about 'Chicago'

Chicago is the largest city in the Midwest. It’s the Windy City. The Second City. It’s also the namesake of a 2002 musical film. “Chicago” was released after the heyday of the Hollywood musical, but that didn’t stop it from finding success. Here’s 20 facts about “Chicago” for you to tangle with.

 
1 of 20

It has a long lineage

It has a long lineage
Miramax

“Chicago” is based off of a 1975 stage musical that was a Bob Fosse production. However, that’s not where it began. That musical is actually based off of a 1927 film also called “Chicago,” which was directed by Cecil B. DeMille. It was a silent movie, so needless to say it wasn’t song-oriented.

 
2 of 20

"Chicago" could have been a Fosse movie

"Chicago" could have been a Fosse movie
Miramax

Fosse hoped to direct a movie adaptation of “Chicago” after the success of his movie “Cabaret.” However, he never got around to it, as he died of a heart attack in 1987 at the age of 60, having never adapted his musical to screen.

 
3 of 20

The director was making his film debut

The director was making his film debut
Miramax

Rob Marshall was eventually hired to directed “Chicago.” It was his first feature film. Prior to that, he made his name on Broadway. Marshall had five Tony nominations to his name by the time he helmed “Chicago.” Fittingly, two of them were for “Cabaret.”

 
4 of 20

Marshall put his personal stamp on it

Marshall put his personal stamp on it
Miramax

The movie adaptation of “Chicago” kept the music of John Kander and the lyrics of Fred Ebb. However, the film did not simply reuse the stage show’s choreography. Marshall, a choreographer by trade, did the movie’s choreography himself.

 
5 of 20

A TV star was considered for the lead role

A TV star was considered for the lead role
Miramax

Renee Zellweger ended up with the role of Roxie Hart, the protagonist of the movie. She wasn’t the only actress considered, however. Jennifer Aniston was also up for the role of Roxie, which would have been a big role for the actress, who was then still playing Rachel on “Friends.”

 
6 of 20

An out-of-left-field option was considered for one role

An out-of-left-field option was considered for one role
Miramax

Billy Flynn is the scheming, charismatic lawyer that represents Roxie in the movie. One name considered seriously for the role? That would be Michael Jackson. Yes, there were some working on the movie who wanted to cast MJ as Billy. Then, producers shut that down, worrying that it would overshadow the rest of the movie.

 
7 of 20

Another actor turned the role of Billy down

Another actor turned the role of Billy down
Miramax

While Richard Gere ended up playing Billy Flynn – and doing a good job – another actor could have had the role if he wanted it. John Travolta was offered the chance to play Billy but turned it down. Travolta has since said he regrets turning it down, which isn’t the first time he’s expressed regret over an acting decision.

 
8 of 20

Gere has picked up after Travolta a few times

Gere has picked up after Travolta a few times
Miramax

Gere could have built his career around just following Travolta around and stepping up to the plate. As we said, Travolta turned down playing Billy Flynn. However, this was actually the fourth time that Gere had taken a role that was originally offered to Travolta.

 
9 of 20

One of the Broadway stars got a cameo

One of the Broadway stars got a cameo
Miramax

The character of Nicky is played by Chita Rivera. It’s a cameo, but one that was a shoutout to the musical. Rivera originated the role of Velma Kelly on Broadway.

 
10 of 20

One song got cut

One song got cut
Miramax

The stage version of “Chicago” presents its songs as vaudeville acts. Marshall was influenced by this, mostly in the way he filmed the events that are happening in Roxie’s head. Everything else is shot in realistic, hard-edged fashion. Because of this, the song “Class,” which is sung by Velma and Mama in the music, was cut by Marshall.

 
11 of 20

John C. Reilly got really into his role

John C. Reilly got really into his role
Miramax

Reilly’s character only has one song, “Mr. Cellophane,” but he was all in for it. The song’s production is heavily indebted to clown iconography. Reilly is such a fan of clowning he insisted on designing his own makeup for the song.

 
12 of 20

Zeta-Jones picked her hairdo

Zeta-Jones picked her hairdo
Miramax

Reilly wasn’t the only actor who had a say in their appearance. Marshall wanted Catherine Zeta-Jones to have long hair in the role of Velma, but the actress wanted her hair in the short bob she wears in the movie. There was a practical reason for this. Zeta-Jones didn’t want her hair to fall in her face when dancing, because it would open the door for people to assume she hadn’t done the dancing herself.

 
13 of 20

The Hungarian isn’t played by a Hungarian

The Hungarian isn’t played by a Hungarian
Miramax

The character of Katalin is a Hungarian woman on death row who doesn’t speak English, but insists she is innocent. However, the actress who plays her is Russian. To an English speaker, this may not be that significant. It’s different for Hungarians, though. Evidently the actress’ Russian accent is so thick that native Hungarian speakers had an issue understanding what she was saying.

 
14 of 20

There was one big change from the musical

There was one big change from the musical
Miramax

Christine Baranski plays investigative reporter Mary Sunshine in the film adaptation, but she never would have been cast in the stage show. That’s not a knock on Baranski. In the stage version, Mary Sunshine was always played by a man in drag. It would be revealed that Mary was a man in drag in the second act. This was nixed from the film.

 
15 of 20

It wasn’t shot in Chicago

It wasn’t shot in Chicago
Miramax

Even though “Chicago” is literally the movie’s name, the film was not shot in the Windy City. In fact, it wasn’t even shot in the same country. “Chicago” was filmed in Toronto instead.

 
16 of 20

It blew up at the box office

It blew up at the box office
Miramax

With a $45 million budget, “Chicago” wasn’t necessarily cheap. However, the film still paid off for the studio. “Chicago" made $170.6 million in the United States and Canada and $306.7 million worldwide. It was the highest-grossing live-action musical ever until “Mamma Mia!” surprised it.

 
17 of 20

“Chicago” set another box-office record

“Chicago” set another box-office record
Miramax

“Chicago” was a hit, but it got there in a strange way. It was never the No. 1 film in the U.S. box office. In fact, it wasn’t ever second either. “Chicago” peaked at No. 3 in the box office. The film set a record for the highest-grossing movie to never reach the top two in the U.S. box office, a record that was broken by “Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel” in 2009.

 
18 of 20

It received a bunch of Oscar nominations

It received a bunch of Oscar nominations
Miramax

“Chicago” took home 12 nominations from the Academy Awards. Many of them were technical, of course, but it also received four acting nominations. That meant there was no way they could win them all, though. Both Queen Latifah and Catherine Zeta-Jones were nominated for Best Supporting Actress.

 
19 of 20

The movie won the big one

The movie won the big one
Miramax

Zeta-Jones did indeed end up taking home Best Supporting Actress. That was one of six wins for the movie. This includes the biggest of them all, Best Picture. “Chicago” winning was a throwback to a different era for the Oscars. Musicals used to win Best Picture fairly often. Four musicals won that award in the 1960s alone, including “Oliver!” in 1968, which was the last musical to win Best Picture before “Chicago.”

 
20 of 20

It was also weirdly well-liked by the Teen Choice Awards

It was also weirdly well-liked by the Teen Choice Awards
Miramax

You might not expect teenagers to be interested in an adaptation of a 1975 Broadway musical set in the Jazz Age. Evidently that wasn’t the case. “Chicago” got five nominations at the Teen Choice Awards. Queen Latifah got two nominations herself, and the movie was nominated for Choice Villain, Choice Liar, and Choice Hissy Fit. However, it didn’t win a single award. Hey, Adam Sandler just had a better hissy fit in “Anger Management.”

Chris Morgan

Chris Morgan is a Detroit-based culture writer who has somehow managed to justify getting his BA in Film Studies. He has written about sports and entertainment across various internet platforms for years and is also the author of three books about '90s television.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

TODAY'S BEST

Five best NFL offseason value signings on offense: Bills get great deal with RB extension
NFL

Five best NFL offseason value signings on offense: Bills get great deal with RB extension

Few know how to spend money like an NFL front office. This offseason, teams handed out over $4 billion in extensions alone, not to mention the several other billions spent in free agency. But which were the shrewdest investments? Below, we examine the best value signings at five positions on offense: quarterback, running back, wide receiver, tight end and offensive line. Las Vegas Raiders quarterback Geno Smith Contract: Two years, $75 million ($65.5M guaranteed) Shortly after acquiring Smith in a trade from the Seattle Seahawks, the Raiders extended the 2022 Associated Press Comeback Player of the Year to a contract that raises the Raiders' floor while maintaining flexibility. Smith has a manageable $26.5M cap hit in 2026, when Over The Cap projects Las Vegas to have the third-most cap space ($78.7M) based on an estimated 5.8 percent cap increase. Since 2022, Smith has the third-highest completion percentage (68.5 percent) among 32 quarterbacks with at least 20 starts during that span. He's also tied with Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes for the second-most fourth-quarter comebacks (10) and trails only Mahomes in game-winning drives. Buffalo Bills running back James Cook Contract: Four years, $48M ($30M guaranteed) Los Angeles Rams running back Kyren Williams pierced Cook's bubble when he signed a three-year, $33M extension on Aug. 5. The Bills running back sought $15M per year, making his $12M in annual average value (AAV) a huge win for Buffalo. Over Cook's first three seasons, he's averaged 4.9 yards per carry. In 2024, he led the NFL with 16 rushing touchdowns. With just 533 career tackles, Cook doesn't have the wear-and-tear of other backs who've made splashes early in their careers, raising hopes that he can withstand the workload that comes with being Buffalo's featured back. Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Tee Higgins Contract: Four years, $115M ($40.9M guaranteed) The Bengals retained Higgins at a remarkable price, keeping him in Cincinnati at less than $30M per year, the going rate for the league's top wideouts. Per Spotrac, while Higgins is No. 10 in AAV among wide receivers, he ranks just outside the top 20 in guaranteed money. Last season, Higgins averaged 75.9 receiving yards per game, his most since 2021, and scored a career-high 10 touchdowns despite missing five games due to injury. Arizona Cardinals tight end Trey McBride Contract: Four years, $76M ($43M guaranteed) The 2024 first-team All-Pro ranks No. 1 among tight ends in guaranteed salary. However, if he continues producing numbers more akin to WR1s — last season, he had 111 receptions, 1,146 receiving yards and two touchdowns — his contract will be one of the league's better bargains. Baltimore Ravens offensive tackle Ronnie Stanley Contract: Three years, $60M ($44M guaranteed) Stanley's journey back from a devastating 2020 lower leg injury culminated in the 2019 first-team All-Pro being named a Pro Bowler for the second time in his first nine seasons last year. The No. 6 overall pick in the 2016 NFL Draft was rewarded with a contract that will keep him in Baltimore through his age-33 season. In terms of average annual value, his extension ranks below other left tackles who signed contracts this offseason, and not just younger players such as Rashawn Slater (Los Angeles Chargers), who was recently lost for the season, and Bernhard Raimann (Indianapolis Colts). Atlanta Falcons tackle Jake Matthews, 33, is averaging $22.5M on his current deal, while Las Vegas Raiders tackle Kolton Miller, 29, is set to earn $22M per year through 2028.

Commanders have major hang-up preventing them from paying Terry McLaurin what he's due
NFL

Commanders have major hang-up preventing them from paying Terry McLaurin what he's due

It’s been two weeks since Washington Commanders star wide receiver Terry McLaurin publicly revealed his trade request, and a resolution doesn’t appear to be in sight. Thanks to ESPN’s John Keim, we’re starting to get more insight into how the Commanders are approaching negotiations…and how they run counter to their star wide receiver’s financial desires. As we’ve assumed all along, the Commanders are wary of giving McLaurin a lucrative contract that would extend well into the player’s 30s. As Keim notes, the Commanders “rely heavily on analytics,” and those numbers aren’t particularly kind to receivers on the wrong side of 30. They may be onto something. Per ESPN Research, over the past five years, only three receivers 31 years or older have played at least 10 games and averaged 70-plus receiving yards per game (that number jumps to six players if you adjust for 60-plus receiving yards). Further, the team can simply point to the NFL landscape, as other teams are also clearly wary of paying aging wideouts. Among the 24 active wide receivers who are attached to the most guaranteed money, only Tyreek Hill was older than 30 when the deal was signed. McLaurin has continually pointed to his lack of mileage despite his age; he barely played during his first two years at Ohio State, meaning he may not have the same wear and tear as similar players his age. McLaurin is also naturally pointing to the stat sheet, as the receiver has continually produced despite uncertain QB play, uncertain ownership and a handful of different coaching staffs. Per Keim, the Commanders don’t want to pay McLaurin based on his past performance, with the front office preferring to shape any future contracts based on his projections for age-31-plus seasons. The organization also doesn’t want to set a new precedent by paying McLaurin, as it could convince future veterans to push for lucrative deals in their 30s. While McLaurin has taken the drastic measure of requesting a trade out of Washington, the organization is still convinced they have leverage in this showdown. After all, the player is still under contract for the 2025 campaign, meaning McLaurin will have to forfeit game checks if he sits out games. The team could even choose to slap him with the franchise tag next offseason (which could come in north of $30M), meaning they’re in full control of the player’s fate moving forward. The team is also skeptical that another suitor is going to willingly pay McLaurin the type of money he’s seeking. Per Keim, there’s doubts around the league about whether another team would be willing to meet the receiver’s demands. Even if a clear suitor does emerge, Keim makes it clear that Washington’s front office won’t give the star away without receiving a haul. We heard recently that McLaurin wasn’t necessarily seeking a deal that matched fellow 2019 draftee D.K. Metcalf‘s deal with the Steelers. However, Keim says Metcalf’s contract has generally served as a guide for McLaurin, but it’s uncertain whether the Commanders wideout is looking to match the AAV ($33M) or total guarantees ($60M). Ultimately, one source believes the Commanders may agree to pay McLaurin a contract that will pay $28M per year. Of course, it’s uncertain if the player would even accept that offer. If that hypothetical maximum offer doesn’t end in a signing, a divorce may be the logical next step.

Browns HC confirms Dillon Gabriel, Shedeur Sanders whispers
NFL

Browns HC confirms Dillon Gabriel, Shedeur Sanders whispers

A previous report suggested that the Cleveland Browns want to start 2025 third-round draft pick Dillon Gabriel at quarterback for this coming Saturday's preseason game at the Philadelphia Eagles over 2025 fifth-rounder Shedeur Sanders as long as Gabriel is healthy enough to play at Philadelphia's Lincoln Financial Field. While speaking with reporters ahead of Wednesday's joint practice involving the clubs, Browns head coach Kevin Stefanski confirmed that Gabriel began the day on track to start Saturday's contest. "The plan was always to give both of those guys a start in the preseason, so we’ll see how it shakes out," Stefanski explained, as shared by Josh Alper of Pro Football Talk. Neither Gabriel nor backup Kenny Pickett played in Cleveland's preseason opener at the Carolina Panthers on Friday as they continued to recover from lingering hamstring injuries. Sanders received the bulk of the meaningful reps in that game and completed 14-of-23 passes for 138 yards and two touchdowns in a 30-10 win over Carolina. While Gabriel is doing 11-on-11 work during joint practices this week, Pickett remained relegated to 7-on-7 drills as of Wednesday. That said, FanDuel Sportsbook continued to list 40-year-old Joe Flacco as the betting favorite at -310 odds to be the Browns' starting quarterback for their Week 1 game against the Cincinnati Bengals as of Wednesday. Pickett was at +360 odds, followed by Sanders at +1060. Gabriel was a +1800 underdog to get the nod for the Cincinnati matchup at that time. Gabriel began Wednesday as the Browns' unofficial QB3 ahead of Sanders. Meanwhile, Sanders did not get any reps in the opening few periods of the Browns' joint practice with the Eagles on Wednesday morning after suffering an oblique injury. Earlier in the month, the former Colorado star missed some practice time due to arm soreness. Per Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Stefanski added that he wants "to get through" Thursday before he finalizes his plans for the Philadelphia game. Unless Gabriel experiences a setback ahead of the weekend, it seems he will receive an opportunity to silence critics while serving as Cleveland's temporary QB1 against the Eagles.

Taylor Swift went bonkers when Chiefs selected speedy WR in 2024
NFL

Taylor Swift went bonkers when Chiefs selected speedy WR in 2024

When Taylor Swift started dating Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce in 2023, she knew little about football. Now, the pop star is obsessed with the sport. She tracks who the Chiefs select in the NFL Draft. During her Wednesday debut on Kelce's podcast, "New Heights," Swift recalled going bonkers when Kansas City selected wide receiver Xavier Worthy with pick No. 28 in the 2024 draft. "Oh my god, I fell in love with [football]," Swift said. "I became obsessed with it. I became a person who was running through the halls of my house screaming, 'We drafted Xavier Worthy.' And my friends were like. 'Who's body snatched you? What do you mean we drafted Xavier Worthy?' I was screeching. I couldn't believe it." Kelce said Swift was the first person to tell him the Chiefs selected Worthy, who set a 40-yard dash record (4.21 seconds) at the 2024 NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis. "You were the first person to tell me that we drafted the fastest man in the draft," he said. "I couldn't believe it either. I was like, 'Is she right?' I'm gonna have to look this up. Did she get the wrong information here?' But, yeah, we traded up [from pick No. 32 with the Buffalo Bills]." Along with monitoring the Chiefs' drafts, Swift has learned more about the sport's various pass coverages and rules. The 14-time Grammy winner admitted she thought all offensive players played at the same time and didn't know what a first down was before she started dating Kelce. "We're talking about Cover 2, Cover 4, Cover 0, man coverage," she said. "I'm not ready to be an analyst right now, but give me 16 months." Perhaps one of the league's broadcast crews will let Swift make a brief appearance in the booth when she attends one of Kelce's games. Worthy, meanwhile, could continue to showcase why he made Swift ecstatic on draft night. In his rookie season, he had 59 receptions for 638 yards and six touchdown catches in 17 games. With the Chiefs expanding his role this season, he could be in for a more productive year.