On Facebook
On Flipboard
On Twitter
Michelle Visage has clarified her "open marriage" and insists she has never slept "with another man".
Last year, the 'RuPaul's Drag Race' judge said that she and spouse David Case – who she tied the knot with in 1997 and have two daughters together - “live openly" and she has now explained that it doesn’t mean the couple participate in “swinging” and are very much the love of each other’s lives, but she doesn’t necessarily believe couples are “meant to be monogamous”.
She told Closer UK magazine: “The original quote was sensationalised.
“He’s the love of my life, I’m the love of his and we’re not looking for anybody else, but we’ve always been very honest.
“That doesn’t mean we’re out swinging and doing things like that.
“The headlines I read were like, ‘Having sex with other men is what makes our marriage stronger!
“No, I’ve never had sex with another man.
“To be honest, I’m not sure we’re meant to be monogamous, but that’s not my decision to make.
“It’s whatever works for you and your partner.”
Speaking on the 'Origins With Cush Jumbo' podcast last year, she had said: "So when I met David, I was 26. I got married at 27. Still young. 'We've been together for 28 years now and I met him in New York City in Central Park and I had just gotten out of a relationship that was like the love of my life and he destroyed me.
"After that, I had a summer of debauchery and then I met David in Central Park and he was so opposite. He was very much like Michael, my ex-fiancé. We live openly, so he would get off knowing that I was so happy and no matter what it is that I do, and I'm not just talking sexually. Whatever it is, I don't know if I have compersion in me to be really excited if he's doing something with another woman but I know that it exists and he is 100 per cent that.
"The full transparency of the way we live our lives. Completely and, by the way, sometimes it's not even necessary. It's just, meaning, we don't do anything. It's just the ability to be able to. [...] And that's what works for us."
More must-reads:
Breaking News
Trending in Entertainment
TODAY'S BEST
Cowboys' Jerry Jones has made a decision about George Pickens
The Dallas Cowboys made a big gamble in the offseason. On paper, adding George Pickens to the mix was going to work wonders for the passing game. However, Pickens had a long history of character issues, and watching Mike Tomlin essentially give up on him wasn't an encouraging sign. Fast forward to today, and the Georgia product has finally shown what he's capable of. That's why he may not be going anywhere. Jerry Jones wants to keep George Pickens around Cowboys insider Jon Machota of The Athletic reported that Jones affirmed that he's willing to spend big bucks to keep Pickens around, even though he's already committed more than $60 million a year to defensive tackles. Jones had previously been more tight-lipped about this situation, claiming that money would obviously be a factor to consider. But after watching Pickens haul in nine receptions for 144 yards and one touchdown in the 33-16 win over the Las Vegas Raiders on Monday, he may have changed his stance. Jerry Jones gushes about George Pickens' performance Following the win, the Cowboys owner/GM had nothing but praise for the former second-round pick. "Pickens was — I’ve never seen a performance like that. It was poetic the way that he was making those moves out there. It was like he was in an opera or something out there. A ballet," Jones said, per Pro Football Talk. Character concerns aside, Pickens has all the talent in the world, and his tandem with CeeDee Lamb is one of the most explosive in the league. He's up to 58 receptions on 83 targets for 908 yards and seven touchdowns in his first 10 games with the Cowboys, and he's looking at a big payday this offseason.
Bengals WR Ja’Marr Chase’s One-Game Suspension Upheld
According to Michael Signora, the NFL has upheld Bengals WR Ja’Marr Chase‘s one-game suspension for spitting on Steelers DB Jalen Ramsey in Week 11. The incident sparked a commotion in Sunday’s game, where Ramsey threw a punch that got him ejected. Ramsey later said Chase spat on him, which provoked him. Chase denied it, but video from the game showed he was lying. The NFL has put an extra emphasis on sportsmanship this year, ejecting Eagles DT Jalen Carter for spitting in Week 1 and treating that as a de facto suspension by fining him a game check as well. He will now miss Cincinnati’s game against the Patriots in Week 12. A suspension costs Chase a game check worth $448,333 and a $58,824 active roster bonus. Chase, 25, was a two-year starter at LSU and a unanimous All-American during his sophomore season. He opted out of the 2020 college football season due to the pandemic. The Bengals took Chase with the No. 5 overall pick in the 2021 NFL Draft. He was in the fourth year of a four-year, $30,819,642 contract with the Bengals that included a $19,774,285 signing bonus when the Bengals picked up a fifth-year option worth $21.816 million fully guaranteed for the 2025 season. The Bengals and Chase then agreed to a massive, four-year, $160 million contract extension. In 2025, Chase has appeared in 10 games for the Bengals and caught 79 passes on 117 targets for 861 yards and five touchdowns.
Commanders rocked as a young defender’s emergence violently collapses
The Washington Commanders are mercifully at their bye week. This time last year, fans were dreaming of potentially making a postseason run. This time around, it's an entirely different story. There's plenty of blame to be tossed around. That being said, Washington's defense was much-improved from previous weeks against the Miami Dolphins after head coach Dan Quinn took over coordinator duties from Joe Whitt Jr. The Commanders are particularly banking on growth from their long-term building blocks after the change. Some such players, including defensive lineman Javon Kinlaw and cornerback Mike Sainristil (fourth-quarter muffed punt return aside), had positive showings. Others, not so much. Commanders put Quan Martin on notice after underwhelming campaign so far Entering the 2025 season, safety Quan Martin was considered one of the Commanders' top breakout candidates. He came on strong at the end of 2024, solidifying his starting spot and making some big plays during Washington's run to the NFC title game. Notably, he recorded a pick-six in the divisional round win over the Detroit Lions. Martin was expected to be one of Washington's top emerging young pieces. Instead, he has taken a step backwards. The free-agent loss of Jeremy Chinn and the injury to Will Harris have placed a greater burden on the Illinois product, and he's struggled in coverage and tackling. The 2023 second-round pick's issues continued in the NFL's inaugural trip to Madrid, and Martin saw his snap count take a significant hit. The third-year pro was on the field for only 66 percent of the Commanders' defensive plays, way down from his season mark of 92%. Darnell Savage Jr. saw 26 snaps compared to Martin's 37, a troubling sign for the player. Harris could also be set to return after the Commanders' Week 12 bye, so it will be interesting to see how that plays into his role moving forward. Jeremy Reaves has been holding down the fort at strong safety in Harris's absence, and Quinn may want to explore moving one of them to free safety if Martin remains a liability. Either way, it's not looking good for the long-term future of a player the Commanders had high hopes for before the campaign. Martin still has the rest of the season and possibly next year to turn the narrative around, but his playing time can no longer be taken for granted. The message has been sent loud and clear to all underperforming contributors, particularly on the defensive side of the ball. Play better, or you won't play.
Pirates' willingness to spend could preview next CBA
The Pittsburgh Pirates and willingness to spend in free agency are rarely seen together without the words "do not have a" between them. That is not the case this offseason. ESPN's Jeff Passan reported that the Pirates had pursued first baseman Josh Naylor in free agency before he returned to the Seattle Mariners on a five-year, $92.5M contract. While Passan did not provide an exact dollar amount, he did note that the Pirates were willing to spend more than $78M to bring Naylor on board. Such a contract would be unprecedented for the Pirates. Their largest free agent contract was given to pitcher Francisco Liriano in 2015 — a three-year, $39M deal. That history made it easy to dismiss The Athletic's Ken Rosenthal's report that the Pirates were looking to be aggressive and spend during the offseason. Time is right for the Pirates to spend on roster, but motive may not be obvious This is the perfect time to spend to supplement the Pirates core, at least in theory. The Pirates have an exciting young rotation headlined by 2025 NL Cy Young Award winner Paul Skenes, who is still a year away from arbitration. However, the Pirates have typically pinched pennies hard enough to make Abe Lincoln cry, residing in the bottom quarter of the league in payroll for 21 of the last 22 years. The Pirates newfound willingness to spend may also be a precursor of changes to come league-wide. While most of the focus during the current Collective Bargaining Agreement negotiations involves ownership looking to impose a salary cap, the league is also looking to institute a salary floor. Such a floor would likely force the Pirates to increase payroll, making such forays into free agency necessary. If ownership is willing to spend on the roster, the Pirates could be an attractive destination. Their rotation is one of the best in baseball and they have five of the top 100 prospects per MLB.com, including the top prospect in shortstop Konnor Griffin, who could debut in 2026. The Pirates are finally ready to spend on the roster; they may not have a choice otherwise.
Customize Your Newsletter
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!
PRIVACY POLICY EDITORIAL POLICY CONTACT US
ABOUT YARDBARKER TERMS OF SERVICE
Use of this website (including any and all parts and
components) constitutes your acceptance of these
Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
This site is for entertainment purposes only.
There is no gambling offered on this site.
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
