2025 NFL Draft: Early Round Draft Grades For Every Team

Buffalo Bills

#30 – Maxwell Hairston, CB, Kentucky

Positives:

• Fantastic foot quickness and coverage control
• Play recognition and anticipation at the catch pointbrya
• Deters targets with speed and length

Negatives:

• Impatient—jumps routes too early
• Struggles versus stronger receivers
• Limited impact in run defense

Team Fit:
Adds speed and length to man coverage, but his run-support and consistency remain concerns.

Grade: B

#41 – TJ Sanders, DT

Positives:

• Plays bigger and stronger than size suggests
• Violent hand usage and length leverage
• Immediate pass-rush plug-and-play

Negatives:

• Anchor struggles in zone-run schemes
• Average quickness limits upside
• Limited stunt effectiveness

Team Fit:
Trading up to shore up the defensive tackle room makes sense; Sanders provides a solid floor as a rotational pass rusher.

Grade: B

#72 – Landon Jackson, EDGE

Positives:

• Big-bodied with length and power
• Can shed blocks and create back-field disruption
• Strong hand finish

Negatives:

• More linear than explosive athlete
• Stiffness limits edge bending
• High pad level reduces leverage

Team Fit:
Prototypical strong-side end in Buffalo’s scheme—reliable, veteran-type strength, though not a high-splash playmaker.

Grade: C+

Miami Dolphins

#13 – Kenneth Grant, IDL, Michigan

Positives:

• Mountainous build that handles double teams
• Versatile across the defensive front
• Excellent power and pad maintenance

Negatives:

• Slower off the snap than top pass rushers
• Limited lateral range due to foot speed
• Can be streaky with impact

Team Fit:
Fills the void left by Wilkins—rare movement for a 330-plus pounder gives hope in both run defense and as a pass-rush option.

Grade: B+

#37 – Jonah Savaiinaea, OG

Positives:

• Terrific athletic mover in space
• Thick build with natural power
• Patient and composed in pass protection

Negatives:

• Lacks lower-body anchor strength
• Slow on stunt pickups
• Flexibility concerns despite athleticism

Team Fit:
A Day 2 guard was a must—upside to a Pro Bowl if he adds strength and adjusts to NFL stunting early.

Grade: B+

New England Patriots

#4 – Will Campbell, OL, LSU

Positives:

• Technically refined pass blocker
• Mauler downhill in run game
• High character and work ethic

Negatives:

• Shorter arms hint at kicking inside
• High-floor, lower-ceiling profile

Team Fit:
Top-5 value in a thin tackle class—Campbell’s ability to slide inside or play tackle gives Drake Maye security.

Grade: B

#38 – TreVeyon Henderson, RB

Positives:

• Elite acceleration into breakaway speed
• Improved patience and vision
• Zero fumbles, strong pass-blocking technique

Negatives:

• Durability concerns from college
• Limited lateral agility
• Doesn’t vary speed to throttle

Team Fit:
Brings the explosiveness New England desperately needed—pairs with Stevenson to give Maye a true three-down weapon.

Grade: A

#40 – Tyler Shough, QB

Positives:

• Strong arm on downfield throws
• Good downhill runner
• Showed improved decision-making in 2024

Negatives:

• Limited starting experience
• Turns 26 as a rookie
• Erratic under pressure

Team Fit:
Reaching for an older prospect with turnover risks—unlikely to be a long-term answer.

Grade: D

New York Jets

#7 – Armand Membou, OT, Missouri

Positives:

• Patient, technically sound pass blocker
• Massive frame with surprising balance
• Finishes blocks well in run game

Negatives:

• Stiff in run-game outside leverage
• May need to slide inside if flexibility lags

Team Fit:
Addresses the blindside immediately—Membou’s blend of size and technique locks down a key spot for the long haul.

Grade: A

#42 – Mason Taylor, TE

Positives:

• Smooth athlete with route versatility
• Strong hands through contact
• Reliable in traffic

Negatives:

• Lacks “gear” to separate consistently
• Blocking technique still raw

Team Fit:
Modern receiving TE who stretches the middle—perfect complement to the existing blocking core.

Grade: B+

#73 – Azareye’h Thomas, CB

Positives:

• Elite press coverage technique
• Prototypical boundary-corner speed
• Highly competitive physical style

Negatives:

• Limited ballhawk traits
• Zone-coverage discipline lapses

Team Fit:
Pairing with Sauce Gardner creates a lethal press duo—locks down the boundary immediately.

Grade: A

#88 – Caleb Ransaw, CB

Positives:

• Quick short-area burst in nickel
• Physical tackler
• Natural feel in space

Negatives:

• Sloppy trail footwork
• Needs better ball-locating instincts

Team Fit:
Immediate special-teams ace with a path to nickel snaps as he refines his coverage.

Grade: C-

#89 – Wyatt Milum, OG

Positives:

• Thick lower-body drive in run game
• Powerful hands
• Stops bull rushers effectively

Negatives:

• Footwork and balance can be disjointed
• Lacks lateral agility

Team Fit:
Day 3 steal—his power fits Jacksonville’s zone-blocking scheme and could develop into a starter.

Grade: B+

AFC North

Baltimore Ravens

#27 – Malaki Starks, SAF, Georgia

Positives:

• Rangy over-the-top safety who hunts the ball
• Plays faster than his Combine time
• Excellent timing challenging catches

Negatives:

• Limited run-support impact
• Overall athleticism not explosive
• Struggled in man coverage

Team Fit:
Pairs with Kyle Hamilton to maximize turnover potential—bolsters depth in multiple packages.

Grade: A

#59 – Mike Green, EDGE

Positives:

• Explosive burst around the corner
• Relentless motor and hand activity
• Effective hip dip for bull rush

Negatives:

• Frame feels maxed out
• Limited reach vs. longer tackles
• Can lose run contain when over-pursuing

Team Fit:
Provides the high-energy pass-rush element Baltimore’s scheme has lacked—should contribute immediately on passing downs.

Grade: A+

#93 – Emery Jones Jr., OL

Positives:

• Versatile at tackle or guard
• Fast hands and quick recovery
• Standout flexibility in pass sets

Negatives:

• Can overextend and lose balance
• Lacks pop on initial contact
• Needs better blitz recognition

Team Fit:
Sliding inside to guard addresses immediate need—projects as a starter by Year 2.

Grade: B-

Cincinnati Bengals

#17 – Shemar Stewart, EDGE, Texas A&M

Positives:

• Rare size/speed/explosiveness combo
• Unstoppable bull-rush flashes
• Elite bend and balance

Negatives:

• Awareness lapses cost finishing opportunities
• Over-leans vs. length
• Lacks a developed rush plan

Team Fit:
High-risk, high-reward swing—could be All-Pro or struggle to produce.

Grade: C

#49 – Demetrius Knight, LB

Positives:

• Controlled pursuit with finishing juice
• Natural in space coverage
• Racks up tackles

Negatives:

• Average athleticism—relies on instincts
• Limited man-coverage impact
• Not a pass-rush threat

Team Fit:
Classic tackle-machine linebacker—needs to force turnovers to boost impact protecting Joe Burrow.

Grade: C

#81 – Dylan Fairchild, IOL

Positives:

• Frame with long-term power upside
• Quick hands and reactions
• Laterally explosive for size

Negatives:

• Struggles vs. power rushers
• Needs a firmer initial punch
• Modest run-game waves

Team Fit:
Thrown into a struggling interior line—may start early but needs development in strength and technique.

Grade: C

Cleveland Browns

#5 – Mason Graham, IDL, Michigan

Positives:

• Excellent motor and destructive mentality
• High-end power with surprising quickness
• Lateral range for three-down work

Negatives:

• Short arms require winning early
• Could add more bull-rush power
• Not a pure nose-tackle anchor

Team Fit:
Answers a long-standing interior need—trade-off for Hunter worth it for an instant impact player.

Grade: A

#33 – Carson Schwesinger, LB

Positives:

• Safety-like movement ability
• Fast reaction times and instincts
• Special-teams star

Negatives:

• Size/power mismatch leads to missed tackles
• Tweener struggles vs. the run
• Scheme-dependent for success

Team Fit:
Replaces Owusu-Koramoah’s range—Jim Schwartz can maximize his coverage skills but must hide run deficiencies.

Grade: C

Pittsburgh Steelers

#21 – Derrick Harmon, IDL, Oregon

Positives:

• Top-tier interior pass-rush presence
• Great range and lateral agility
• Promising run-defense vision

Negatives:

• Balance issues vs. double teams
• Needs to finish better at point of attack
• Stiff in stunt exchanges

Team Fit:
Instantly plugs a gap on an aging front—should yield consistent interior pressure.

Grade: B+

#83 – Kaleb Johnson, RB

Positives:

• Workhorse prototype with deep speed
• Patient ball carrier who maximizes cuts
• Never stops his feet

Negatives:

• Lacks nimble flexibility
• Average power despite size
• Poor pass-blocking

Team Fit:
Fits Harbaugh’s outside-zone scheme—poised to upgrade the ground game Day 1.

Grade: B

AFC South

Houston Texans

#34 – Jayden Higgins, WR

Positives:

• Huge frame with monstrous wingspan
• Underrated route runner for size
• Power after the catch

Negatives:

• Tight hips limit explosion after cuts
• Relies on contested catches
• Separation can be inconsistent

Team Fit:
Trading down for a big-receiver punch—Higgins mirrors Nico Collins’s skillset, setting up a fun tandem.

Grade: B+

#48 – Aireontae Ersery, OT

Positives:

• Elite length and power combination
• Good lateral agility and recovery
• Coordinated giant with impressive reps

Negatives:

• Slow hands require anticipation
• Limited mauling in run schemes
• Best fit in gap schemes, not zone

Team Fit:
Last projected starting tackle in the class—upside high if punch timing and reaction improve.

Grade: B+

#79 – Jaylin Noel, WR

Positives:

• Ideal slot build for contested catches
• Efficient chunk-play creator
• Shockingly strong contested-catch ability

Negatives:

• Limited YAC explosion
• Deep speed less impressive than timed
• Small frame

Team Fit:
A sequel to Tank Dell—highly competitive slot-man receiver who can step in Day 1.

Grade: B+

#97 – Jaylin Smith, CB

Positives:

• Versatile secondary experience
• Good footwork and reaction speed
• Physical tackler

Negatives:

• Small, lean frame limits upside
• Tight hips for his size
• Struggles to tackle bigger ball carriers

Team Fit:
Toughness is evident but size likely projects him as a slot safety—reach at No. 97.

Grade: D-

Indianapolis Colts

#14 – Tyler Warren, TE, Penn State

Positives:

• Vertical explosiveness
• High IQ with catch-and-run awareness
• Competitive blocker and receiver

Negatives:

• Average inline-blocking impact
• Late-blooming, older prospect
• Limited man-coverage experience

Team Fit:
Gives Indy a true multi-role weapon—inline, receiving, or ball carrier on short-yardage looks.

Grade: A

#45 – JT Tuimoloau, EDGE

Positives:

• Stellar run defender with elite awareness
• Powerful build and relentless motor
• Downhill athlete for his size

Negatives:

• Lacks quick-twitch speed wins
• Limited flexibility through contact
• Underdeveloped pass-rush move plan

Team Fit:
Saved his best tape for the end—projected rotational piece with growth tied to refining his pass rush.

Grade: C+

#80 – Justin Walley, CB

Positives:

• Ballhawk presence—forces turnovers
• Versatile inside/outside slot fit
• Great footwork and technique

Negatives:

• Over-aggressive ball chasing
• Poor tackling form
• Average burst and speed

Team Fit:
Slot versatility boost—needs refinement in instincts and tackling but offers big-play potential.

Grade: C

Jacksonville Jaguars

#2 – Travis Hunter, CB/WR

Positives:

• Uncanny instincts at both positions
• Explosive, quick-twitch playmaker
• Elite character and leadership

Negatives:

• Thin frame near its max
• Relies more on instincts than technique at CB
• Good but not great top-end speed

Team Fit:
Unique two-way weapon—fits as a boundary receiver or slot corner, but price paid trading up is steep.

Grade: C

Tennessee Titans

#1 – Cam Ward, QB, Miami

Positives:

• Eccentric creativity and problem solving
• NFL-caliber arm talent from multiple angles
• Slippery in the pocket to extend plays

Negatives:

• Inconsistent execution hunting big plays
• Gunslinger mentality carries turnover risk
• Lacks top-end athleticism

Team Fit:
Needs an offensive engine—mirrors Jordan Love’s trajectory if Callahan can harness his instincts.

Grade: B+

#52 – Femi Oladejo, EDGE

Positives:

• Versatile—could move to off-ball linebacker
• Good balance and raw power
• Consistent tackler with range

Negatives:

• Raw technician lacking a rush plan
• Overpursues angles and gets lost
• Instincts underdeveloped

Team Fit:
Project pick—early years for refinement, potential as a strong-side linebacker down the road.

Grade: D+

#82 – Kevin Winston, SAF

Positives:

• Versatile defensive-back build
• Hammer in run support
• Excellent deep-safety range

Negatives:

• Recovering from season-ending injury
• Play recognition needs growth
• Man coverage reliant on athleticism

Team Fit:
Durability is the biggest question—range mirrors Kevin Byard, but must prove health and consistency.

Grade: B-

AFC West

Denver Broncos

#20 – Jahdae Barron, CB, Texas

Positives:

• Ballhawk instincts and turnover nose
• Versatile inside/outside/slot fit
• Tenacious tackling

Negatives:

• Limited length for press coverage
• Older breakout prospect
• Best suited for slot, value questionable

Team Fit:
Surprising choice over RB—Barron’s competitiveness wins fans but physical limitations remain a concern.

Grade: C

#60 – R.J. Harvey, RB

Positives:

• Workhorse mentality despite smaller size
• Natural low pad level for contact evasion
• Agile with excellent vision

Negatives:

• Too deliberate—slows holes
• Weak pass protection
• Guns for home runs too often

Team Fit:
Sean Payton loves compact, agile backs—Harvey’s feel for the game fits uphill zone schemes.

Grade: B-

#74 – Pat Bryant, WR

Positives:

• Massive wingspan with refined body control
• Competitive separation against press
• Strong contested-catch ability

Negatives:

• Struggled vs. top competition
• Slow acceleration and limited speed
• Drops early in his career

Team Fit:
Big-body deep threat—fit for vertical scheming but tape inconsistencies make it risky.

Grade: D+

#101 – Sai’vion Jones, EDGE

Positives:

• High football IQ and play awareness
• Strong first step and burst
• Surprising contact balance

Negatives:

• Very raw technician
• Balance issues leveraging hips
• Struggles to set edge vs. run

Team Fit:
Late-round developmental edge—tools are there, but heavy coaching required.

Grade: B-

Kansas City Chiefs

#32 – Josh Simmons, OT, Ohio State

Positives:

• Fluidity and balance in pass protection
• Technically sound from head to toe
• Impactful on screen-plays as length defender

Negatives:

• Needs more initial pop at point of attack
• Coming off torn ACL

Team Fit:
High-risk, high-reward long-term answer for Mahomes’s blindside—patience required for rehab.

Grade: A

#63 – Omarr Norman-Lott, DT

Positives:

• Lightning quick off the snap
• Impressive short-area agility
• Active, tenacious style

Negatives:

• Subpackage specialist
• Limited bulk for two-gap play
• Needs more counter moves

Team Fit:
Immediate rotational pass-rush force—fills the interior speed-rush role on passing downs.

Grade: B+

#66 – Ashton Gillotte, EDGE

Positives:

• Powerful hands and strength
• Good bend through contact
• Immediate rotational impact

Negatives:

• Average closing speed
• Limited down-end explosiveness
• Requires anchor development

Team Fit:
Mid-round value for rotational edge—fits the Chiefs’ tempo defense to spell starters.

Grade: C+

Las Vegas Raiders

#6 – Ashton Jeanty, RB, Boise State

Positives:

• Dynamic, low-to-the-ground runner
• Three-down skill set with receiving chops
• Powerful presentation despite size

Negatives:

• Durability concerns
• Antsy hitting holes too early
• Ball security in traffic

Team Fit:
Luxury pick given OL/WR needs—talented back, but value grade suffers.

Grade: C

#58 – Jack Bech, WR

Positives:

• Textbook size and hands
• Focused body control
• Physical after catch

Negatives:

• Struggles vs. press coverage
• Not quick off the line
• Limited run-blocking effort

Team Fit:
Ready for Chip Kelly’s offense Day 1, but lacks dynamic separation for a primary weapon.

Grade: C

#98 – Caleb Rogers, OG

Positives:

• 4,000+ college snaps of experience
• Active feet maintain balance
• Second-level blocking instincts

Negatives:

• Stiff lateral movement
• Slow blitz recognition
• Inconsistent recovery power

Team Fit:
Depth piece with high floor—trusted veteran presence if injuries strike the line.

Grade: C

#99 – Charles Grant, OT

Positives:

• Massive NFL-prototype frame
• Active, strong hands
• Moves well in space

Negatives:

• Punch timing inconsistency
• Leans too much versus length use
• Pad-level fluctuations

Team Fit:
Day 3 steal—huge frame with starter potential if technique is refined.

Grade: B+

Los Angeles Chargers

#22 – Omarion Hampton, RB, North Carolina

Positives:

• Powerful three-down build
• Explosive acceleration and vision
• Adjusts footwork on the fly

Negatives:

• Limited scheme diversity outside downhill
• Questionable vision on delayed plays
• Won’t outrun defenders outside downhill runs

Team Fit:
Harbaugh’s downhill zone scheme fits Hampton’s profile—he’ll be a key three-down threat.

Grade: A

#55 – Tre Harris, WR

Positives:

• Uses frame to box out defenders
• Terrific after-catch creation
• Long strides to eat space

Negatives:

• Raw route runner
• Played slower than tested
• Needs contested-catch polish

Team Fit:
Slides into WR2 behind McConkey—explosive after the catch, adds a new layer.

Grade: A

#86 – Jamaree Caldwell, DT

Positives:

• Nose-tackle prototype build
• Strong upper body to move blockers
• Relentless motor interior snaps

Negatives:

• Poor pad-level maintenance
• No pass-rush impact
• Misses tackles from stiffness

Team Fit:
Classic Harbaugh interior piece—soaks blocks to free edge rushers; role player by design.

Grade: C

NFC East

Dallas Cowboys

#12 – Tyler Booker, IOL, Alabama

Positives:

• Prototypical guard frame and strength
• Heavy hands and lower-body drive
• Patient versus blitzers

Negatives:

• Poor lateral agility
• Slow-footed limits range
• Inconsistent punch use

Team Fit:
A departure from Dallas’s typical athletic OL picks—power-style guard with a long development arc.

Grade: D

#44 – Donovan Ezeiruaku, EDGE

Positives:

• Agile with hip fluidity
• Strong play recognition
• Long arms overcome size deficits

Negatives:

• Lacks bulk to disengage at length
• Rush plan too reliant on quickness
• Average closing speed

Team Fit:
Complementary pass-rush spark opposite Parsons—value questioned given premium options left.

Grade: B-

#76 – Shavon Revel Jr., CB

Positives:

• Ideal size/speed combo
• Dangerous playmaker
• Willing and physical tackler

Negatives:

• High-cut frame gives leverage issues
• Clunky transitions from press
• Coming off torn ACL

Team Fit:
High-value gamble—if healthy, rare physical traits make him an immediate boundary starter.

Grade: A

New York Giants

#3 – Abdul Carter, EDGE, Penn State

Positives:

• Elite burst off the line
• Contact balance allows great bend
• Efficient one-year starter

Negatives:

• Smaller frame vs. top peers
• Relies on athleticism over refined moves

Team Fit:
Potential long-term successor to Thibodeaux—Carter’s explosiveness upgrades the rush immediately.

Grade: A

#25 – Jaxson Dart, QB, Mississippi

Positives:

• Mobile on rollouts and scrambles
• Solid accuracy and touch
• Point-guard mindset in execution

Negatives:

• Slow processing
• Average arm power under duress
• Upside limited to game manager

Team Fit:
Opting for a Daniel Jones clone is puzzling—analytics appeal aside, his physical traits limit upside.

Grade: C

#65 – Darius Alexander, DT

Positives:

• Versatile across the front
• Athletic frame with balance
• Forceful run defense

Negatives:

• Pad-level control issues
• Occasional focus lapses
• Can be pushed out of gaps

Team Fit:
Adds interior depth, but passing on OL help raised eyebrows—role player more than starter Day 1.

Grade: C+

Philadelphia Eagles

#31 – Jihaad Campbell, LB, Alabama

Positives:

• Read-and-react pursuit ability
• Powerful tackler
• Third-down blitz threat

Negatives:

• Still refining run-diagnosis
• Needs edge-setting discipline
• Embraces contact over avoidance

Team Fit:
Roseman’s pivot to off-ball talent gives Philly a multi-down playmaker with unique blitz upside.

Grade: A

#64 – Andrew Mukuba, SAF

Positives:

• Excellent field vision
• Thrived as deep safety in college
• Comfortable in man coverage

Negatives:

• Thin frame limits tackling power
• Takes poor angles at times
• Subpackage-only risk

Team Fit:
Lean frame likely caps snaps, but his range fits well in Philadelphia’s Cover 2 rotations.

Grade: B

Washington Commanders

#29 – Josh Conerly, OT, Oregon

Positives:

• Balance and mirror ability
• Solid punch in pass protection
• NFL-ready athletic instincts

Negatives:

• Needs strength in run game
• Overcommits outside edge
• Struggles vs. bull rush without anchor

Team Fit:
Needed tackle competition—Conerly’s upside real, but development on strength is urgent.

Grade: B+

#61 – Trey Amos, CB

Positives:

• Rare size/speed ratio for press man
• Excellent body control
• Ball-production at catch point

Negatives:

• Gives too much space in off-man
• Overzealous breaks on the ball
• Reacts to hands over locating the ball

Team Fit:
Dan Quinn’s scheme loves physical corners—Amos’s size and effort complement Lattimore in press coverage.

Grade: A

NFC North

Chicago Bears

#10 – Colston Loveland, TE, Michigan

Positives:

• Tremendous hands and reliability
• Ideal blocking frame
• Creative after the catch

Negatives:

• Not a vertical deep threat
• Explosiveness more subtle, scheme-dependent

Team Fit:
Gives Caleb Williams a security blanket over the middle, but value feels rich at 10.

Grade: C+

#39 – Luther Burden III, WR

Positives:

• Effortless acceleration to top speed
• Tremendous game feel
• True open-field playmaker

Negatives:

• Raw route runner
• Concentration drops
• Scheme-dependent until polished

Team Fit:
Nails WR need—Burden’s big-play ability provides an explosive complement to DJ Moore.

Grade: A

#56 – Ozzy Trapilo, OT

Positives:

• Blitz and stunt awareness
• Proper use of length keeps rushers at bay
• Strong hand strength

Negatives:

• Controls rather than strikes
• Slow to adjust to speed rushers
• Limited run-drive

Team Fit:
Developmental tackle priority pays off—Trapilo’s size and awareness give upside behind the scenes.

Grade: B-

#62 – Shemar Turner, DT

Positives:

• Aggressive motor
• Quick interior burst
• Scheme versatility

Negatives:

• Smaller tackle frame
• Overpursuit of gaps
• Leverage issues

Team Fit:
Sub-package disruptor in passing downs—explosive interior rusher for Chicago’s rotation.

Grade: A-

Detroit Lions

#28 – Tyleik Williams, IDL, Ohio State

Positives:

• Prototypical gap clogger
• Overwhelms blockers with physicality
• Lateral agility better than expected

Negatives:

• High pad level costs production
• Inconsistent quickness
• Limited pass-rush upside

Team Fit:
Premium cost for run-defender—may flourish more as a three-down complement to Hutchinson.

Grade: C-

#57 – Tate Ratledge, OL

Positives:

• Heavy, effective lower-body drive
• Patient versus blitzers
• Strong hand placement

Negatives:

• Pad-level inconsistencies
• Slow reactions with long limbs
• Poor overall athlete

Team Fit:
Throwback interior blocker—power-style suits Detroit’s system if technique sharpens.

Grade: B-

#70 – Isaac TeSlaa, WR

Positives:

• Strong, physical frame with speed
• Excellent ball tracking
• Run-blocking prowess

Negatives:

• Limited production volume
• Average route quickness
• Separation relies on frame and hands

Team Fit:
Day 3 steal—slot mismatch receiver with great hands, ideal complement in a speedy WR room.

Grade: C-

Texas Longhorns wide receiver Matthew Golden (2) catches a pass during the second half of the Cotton Bowl Classic College Football Playoff semifinal game against the Ohio State Buckeyes at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas on Jan. 10, 2025. Ohio State won 28-14.

Green Bay Packers

#23 – Matthew Golden, WR, Texas

Positives:

• Versatile inside/outside roles
• True speed separationhig
• Highlight-reel sideline body control

Negatives:

• Limited after-catch power
• Lazy route running relying on speed
• Needs strength improvement

Team Fit:
Finesse speedster to stretch the field—fills the Christian Watson void with high upside.

Grade: A

#54 – Anthony Belton, OT

Positives:

• Enormous frame and wingspan
• Power matches expectations
• Surprisingly agile footwork

Negatives:

• Balance issues when knocked off spot
• Erratic hand placement
• Slow kick-slide

Team Fit:
Mauler for the run game—requires time for pass-pro consistency.

Grade: B

#87 – Savion Williams, WR

Positives:

• Size-speed versatility
• Offensive weapon in multiple roles
• Great hand-eye coordination

Negatives:

• Raw route runner
• Dependent on schemed open looks
• Concentration drops

Team Fit:
Practice-squad upside; role carving will take time, but physical traits intrigue.

Grade: C

Ohio State Buckeyes offensive lineman Donovan Jackson (74) celebrates a touchdown by TreVeyon Henderson against the Indiana Hoosiers at Ohio Stadium in Columbus.

Minnesota Vikings

#24 – Donovan Jackson, OL, Ohio State

Positives:

• Versatile left tackle/guard
• Rare length with power
• Smooth athletic footwork

Negatives:

• Slow punch inside
• Top-heavy balance issues

Team Fit:
Projected inside; athletic upside could yield All-Pro guard play with improved hand quickness.

Grade: B-

#102 – Tai Felton, WR

Positives:

• Excellent size-to-speed ratio
• Deep-threat ball tracking
• Versatile role capability

Negatives:

• Struggles vs. press/tackling physicality
• Inconsistent after-catch creation
• Run blocking average

Team Fit:
Explosive early-season performer—stretches the field while refining routes.

Grade: C

NFC South

Atlanta Falcons

#15 – Jalon Walker, EDGE/LB, Georgia

Positives:

• Range and physicality as off-ball LB
• Pass-rush value in subpackages
• Twitchy safety-like movement

Negatives:

• Lacks size for full-time edge
• Instincts tick slow vs. LB keys
• Risk of tweener status

Team Fit:
Creative usage as a rush linebacker gives Atlanta flexibility despite not being a traditional edge.

Grade: B-

#26 – James Pearce Jr., EDGE, Tennessee

Positives:

• Electric burst off the snap
• Good bend and contact balance
• High motor and effort sacks

Negatives:

• Lean build limits power
• Average play strength
• Overpursues angles

Team Fit:
Speed-rush specialist to bolster their pass-rush—early impact expected on obvious passing downs.

Grade: B+

#96 – Xavier Watts, SAF

Positives:

• Ballhawk versatility
• Excellent anticipation and range
• Fast reaction in run support

Negatives:

• Overextends assignments
• Stiff in man coverage
• Inconsistent tackling

Team Fit:
Adds a rangy playmaker to the secondary—discipline must catch up to his instincts.

Grade: B+

Carolina Panthers

#8 – Tetarioa McMillan, WR, Arizona

Positives:

• Massive catch radius
• Sideline body control
• Instinctive zone separation

Negatives:

• Lacks contested strength over middle
• Lazy route detail at times
• Average top-end speed

Team Fit:
Gives Bryce Young a unique vertical and YAC threat—perfect blend of size and open-field creativity.

Grade: A

#51 – Nic Scourton, EDGE

Positives:

• Strength and first-step burst
• Versatile front alignment
• Quickness for size

Negatives:

• Doughy early season frame
• Limited length
• Gap-discipline lapses

Team Fit:
High-upside developmental pick—potential boom or bust depending on discipline and motor consistency.

Grade: C

#77 – Princely Umanmielen, EDGE

Positives:

• Pass-rush specialist with bend
• Good speed through contact
• Improved run defense late in career

Negatives:

• One-dimensional—limited run-support reliability
• Limited athletic explosiveness
• Value tied solely to rush impact

Team Fit:
Depth edge rusher for rotational snaps—subpackage prowess should yield early opportunities.

Grade: B-

New Orleans Saints

#9 – Kelvin Banks, OT, Texas

Positives:

• Athletic mirror ability off the edge
• Patient footwork and balance
• Lower-body explosion

Negatives:

• Can lose balance when shoulders over feet
• Sloppy hand placement at times
• Needs grip strength in run game

Team Fit:
Proactive OL addition for an aging line—athletic upside provides hope after previous misses.

Grade: B

#71 – Vernon Broughton, DT

Positives:

• Gap-eating double-team specialist
• Maximizes length and hand usage
• Refined pass-rush fundamentals

Negatives:

• Slower athletic profile
• Takes time to shed blocks
• Inconsistent frame strength

Team Fit:
Steadies a thin DL—cog in the early-down rotation rather than highlight reel disruptor.

Grade: C+

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

#19 – Emeka Egbuka, WR, Ohio State

Positives:

• Elite blocker in the run game
• Effortless acceleration
• Tough, reliable catcher

Negatives:

• Limited deep-threat usage in college
• More of a complementary piece
• Average after-catch strength

Team Fit:
Resets WR depth behind aging vets—team-first explosiveness fits Arians’s scheme.

Grade: A

#53 – Benjamin Morrison, CB

Positives:

• Sticky man coverage due to fast feet
• Ball-locating timing and instincts
• Plug-and-play starter potential

Negatives:

• Serious injury red flags
• Can give too much off-man cushion
• Limited zone playmaking

Team Fit:
High-upside injury gamble—if healthy, locks down man coverage for Tampa’s defense.

Grade: B

#84 – Jacob Parrish, CB

Positives:

• Smooth hip transition in routes
• Unique slot man-coverage skill
• Strong deep-ball instincts

Negatives:

• Small, lean frame
• Outmuscled by bigger receivers
• Better coverage qualifier than playmaker

Team Fit:
Versatile secondary depth—slot prowess and deep-coverage savvy fit Bowles’s system.

Grade: C+

NFC West

Arizona Cardinals

#16 – Walter Nolen, IDL, Mississippi

Positives:

• Rare fluidity and range for a tackle
• Wins from multiple alignments
• Active hands and flexibility

Negatives:

• Inconsistent hand grip power
• Relies on quickness over strength
• Must maintain assignment discipline

Team Fit:
High-upside interior rusher in Gannon’s scheme—motor consistency will dictate long-term impact.

Grade: B+

#47 – Will Johnson, CB

Positives:

• Prototypical length and size
• Top instincts and awareness
• Fluid hips and footwork

Negatives:

• Major knee-health concerns
• Average deep speed
• Over-reliance on arm tackles

Team Fit:
Medical gamble on talent—if healthy, his physical profile projects well in zone-heavy coverage.

Grade: B+

#78 – Jordan Burch, DL

Positives:

• Versatile tackle/end front fits
• Strong upper-body play and hand usage
• Real pass-rush threat

Negatives:

• Tends to wander off assigned gaps
• Can disappear in stretches
• Inconsistent production

Team Fit:
Raw athlete with starter upside—patience required for eventual runway as he refines technique.

Grade: C

Los Angeles Rams

#46 – Terrance Ferguson, TE

Positives:

• Inline and slot blocking experience
• Great frame and length
• Unexpected short-area quickness

Negatives:

• Limited deep-speed threat
• Inconsistent concentration at catch point
• Not a physical run-blocker

Team Fit:
Reach for need—but fits McVay’s blocking schemes and offers more route fluidity than Higbee.

Grade: C+

#90 – Josaiah Stewart, EDGE

Positives:

• Efficient, within-limits producer
• Speed and unique stride challenge blockers
• Off-ball coverage upside

Negatives:

• Smaller frame for edge role
• Focus can shift to linemen over ball
• Needs pass-rush move development

Team Fit:
Rotational edge depth for Sean McVay’s defense—subpackage snaps will showcase his burst.

Grade: C+

San Francisco 49ers

#11 – Mykel Williams, EDGE, Georgia

Positives:

• Thick frame with athletic upside
• Speed off the edge
• Strong run-defense awareness

Negatives:

• Durability and experience concerns
• Average upper-body strength
• Can get stuck if burst wanes

Team Fit:
Injury risk but high upside in Shanahan’s high-pressure front—could develop into a premier rusher.

Grade: B

#43 – Alfred Collins, DT

Positives:

• Massive gap-eating presence
• Gets off blocks to make contact
• Occasional push in pass game

Negatives:

• Can disappear for stretches
• Limited athletic upside
• Field vision needs sharpening

Team Fit:
Raises the floor in a thin DT room—role-player on early downs who stabilizes the interior.

Grade: B-

#75 – Nick Martin, LB

Positives:

• Physical finisher in tackles
• Aggressive point-of-attack play
• Quick reaction time

Negatives:

• Slow play diagnosis
• Struggles off blocks
• 2024 knee injury concern

Team Fit:
Depth linebacker with special-teams upside—needs refinement to earn defensive snaps.

Grade: D

#100 – Upton Stout, CB

Positives:

• Elite instincts and reaction
• Fluid hips and quick feet
• Competitive at the catch point

Negatives:

• Tiny frame limits physicality
• Discipline lapses in assignments
• Locating the ball earlier

Team Fit:
Slot-coverage specialist—nickel depth piece whose instincts compensate for size.

Grade: C-

Seattle Seahawks

#18 – Grey Zabel, IOL, North Dakota State

Positives:

• Versatile interior lining
• Physical mauler with upside
• Relentless work ethic

Negatives:

• Weak lower body vs. power
• Bends at waist, opening counters
• Short arms challenge pass sets

Team Fit:
Checks Seattle’s athletic OL box—ideal guard candidate who must refine technique for pass consistency.

Grade: C

#35 – Nick Emmanwori, SAF

Positives:

• Elite athletic testing across positions
• Game-changing ball awareness
• Can eliminate tight ends in coverage

Negatives:

• Can be laid back in run support
• Less fluid vs. slot receivers
• Tackling angles need work

Team Fit:
Adds a workout-warrior who’s more than that—playmaking juice to an ascending secondary.

Grade: A

#50 – Elijah Arroyo, TE

Positives:

• Top-tier receiving mismatch speed
• Rare fluidity as a route runner
• Holds his own as a blocker

Negatives:

• Late-blooming career production
• Lower-body strength average

Team Fit:
Unique vertical threat at TE—fits Carroll’s subpackage seam-route offense immediately.

Grade: A-

#92 – Jalen Milroe, QB

Positives:

• Hyper-athletic dual threat
• Powerful downfield arm
• Avoids turnovers effectively

Negatives:

• Inconsistent footwork zaps accuracy
• Tunnel-vision runner tendencies
• Needs simplified passing scheme early

Team Fit:
Developmental QB with sky-high ceiling—requires patience and a gradual learning curve in Seattle’s system.

Grade: B+