Nigel Owens Slams 20-Minute Red Card Trial: 'It’s Not a Deterrent'

By Dorren Kipchumba

Former Test referee Nigel Owens has voiced firm opposition to World Rugby’s upcoming global trial of the 20-minute red card, calling it ineffective and potentially dangerous.

The law, set for implementation on August 1 in elite competitions, allows a player who receives a red card to be replaced after 20 minutes, rather than leaving their team a player short for the rest of the match.

Owens argues that this change undermines the severity of the punishment for dangerous play and could lead to more reckless behavior on the field. He believes that a true deterrent needs to reflect the seriousness of the offense, ensuring player safety remains a top priority in the game.

Owens took to his official Twitter account to warn that the law fails to change player behavior and undermines safety efforts aimed at reducing high tackles and head collisions.

“It certainly hasn’t changed players’ behavior,” Owens wrote. “It’s not a deterrent, and I think a red card offense should always be met with a straight, permanent red card.”

The former international referee pointed to recent incidents, such as Sam Underhill’s high tackle in the Challenge Cup final, to illustrate that dangerous play remains common, even as red cards have increased. 

Underhill initially received a yellow card for the head-on collision but was later handed a four-match ban. According to Owens, this highlights the need for stronger action on the field.

“For me, there has to be zero tolerance. If you go into a tackle like Underhill did, that should be a straight red card, end of.”

As World Rugby moves forward with the trial, Owens’ remarks reignite debate over how best to protect players while maintaining fairness. 

His stance is clear: accountability must remain strict if rugby is serious about player welfare. With head injuries still frequent, the push for a tougher approach is unlikely to fade.