
Cleveland’s collapse in the Knicks’ 115-104 overtime win in Game 1 was not down to just one thing, but Kenny Atkinson’s decision to hold two timeouts while the lead vanished will still be echoing around Game 2.
The Cavaliers led by 22 in the fourth quarter, watched New York close regulation on a 30-8 run, and Atkinson’s postgame explanation only made the next question more obvious.
Atkinson told reporters, “I like to hold my timeouts… I didn’t want to have one timeout at the end of the game, one or two-point game. I try to hold them.” It is a defensible approach in a typical late-game scenario. But with the Cavs unraveling and the Knicks never letting up, it felt less like strategy and more like a missed lifeline.
Cleveland were up 93-71 with just under eight minutes to go. The Knicks responded with a 30-8 run, tying it on Jalen Brunson’s layup with 19 seconds left, and carried that momentum into overtime for a 44-11 stretch.
Atkinson used just one timeout during the fourth-quarter swing, coming with three and a half minutes left after the Knicks had already closed within five. He still had two timeouts in his pocket when regulation ended.
This is why the decision won’t be forgotten quickly. It wasn’t a single moment that turned the game; it was a slow unravelling over several minutes, and Cleveland never found the pause they needed to regroup.
After the game, Atkinson’s most telling comment wasn’t about timeouts. It was about how Cleveland’s offence lost its rhythm late. He said they went away from what had been working and started playing slower and more predictably. That is exactly when a timeout is supposed to help. Even Atkinson’s defence pointed there.
He talked about fatigue and said players made slower decisions down the stretch and played without enough movement or spacing. Those weren’t just clichés; they were accurate descriptions of what went wrong for Cleveland offensively in that fourth quarter and overtime period.
The Cavaliers finished with only 11 points over the final 12 minutes, shot just 4-for-18 in that span, and turned it over repeatedly as New York kept pushing them out of rhythm. They ended up with 21 turnovers overall, including early ones in overtime when they still hadn’t regrouped.
New York’s comeback wasn’t just a matter of shots falling. The Knicks changed the way they defended, putting more pressure on the ball and forcing Cleveland into uncomfortable decisions.
Atkinson pointed out that New York started blitzing, which meant Cleveland needed to move the ball out of Mitchell’s and Harden’s hands more quickly. In theory, that should have opened up simpler looks elsewhere. But as the momentum shifted, the Cavaliers never really adjusted.
Harden also became a target on defence late in the game. Atkinson said they tried to counter by sending help and rotating behind, but even he admitted their defence fell short in the final quarter.
This was no longer about individual matchups or one-off breakdowns. It was about a team that got stuck reacting both defensively and offensively, without finding any real rhythm to stop it. Coaches are expected to protect their locker room, and Atkinson did just that after the game.
He said Harden had been “one of our best defenders in these playoffs” and made it clear he never considered sitting him for defence-only possessions. He also said the Cavaliers played great basketball for most of the night.
Both statements can be true. But even if they are, it still leaves his decisions under a brighter spotlight. If the players had been fine through three quarters and then suddenly lost control, it raises whether the coaching staff should have stepped in sooner or done more to steady things.
Mitchell’s frustration afterwards only emphasised that point. Cleveland didn’t see this as just bad luck. It saw it as a game it let slip away.
This isn’t just about whether Atkinson should have called a specific timeout at a certain moment. It’s about whether Cleveland can recognise the momentum shift early enough to avoid another collapse.
The Cavaliers don’t need to revisit every detail of what went wrong, but they do need a better plan for when the offence starts to stall again.
Atkinson mentioned the team needs to “keep trusting the pass.” That’s the tactical adjustment. The coaching adjustment is making sure there’s a clear option to halt another slide before it gets out of hand.
Game 2 on May 21 isn’t just about shot-making. It’s about whether Atkinson is ready to use his timeouts more proactively to steady his team when things start slipping again.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!