They’ve had 156 years to figure out how to determine a national champion in college football and they still can’t get it right. Who is “they” exactly? Well, I can’t really pinpoint it but the more “they” expand the College Football Playoff the more ways “they” can find to mess it up. Back before they came up with the CFP or a BCS or a Bowl Alliance, they just had the bowls, and the coaches’ and writers’ polls would declare a national champion (or champions in some years).
In the early 1980s “they” didn’t know about an 11-year-old boy from New York City who had a simple solution. Why not have the top teams play out their bowls based on affiliations at the time (Rose Bowl: Big Ten vs. Pac 10, SEC in the Sugar Bowl, etc.) which would serve as elimination games and then the highest two ranked teams play in a national championship game? “They” would have had a playoff without an actual playoff. The poster seasons for that 11-year-old boy’s vision were 1994 and 1997, the last year before the BCS.
In 1994 Penn State had a powerhouse offense led by QB Kerry Collins, RB Ki-Jana Carter and TE Kyle Brady that rolled to a 12-0 record and a Rose Bowl title but no national championship. In 1997, a Michigan team led by Heisman Trophy winner DB Charles Woodson and QB Brian Griese did the same thing and won a split of the national championship. By the way, that Michigan team was so good, the backup QB to Griese was a fellow by the name of Tom Brady.
RETWEET if you think MICHIGAN would have won the 1997 "National Championship" vs. Nebraska pic.twitter.com/RrsVm2CWpy
— Pick Six Previews (@PickSixPreviews) July 8, 2017
Both those years, Nebraska won the national championship, outright over Penn State in 1994 and shared with Michigan in 1997. To this day, that 11-year old boy still wishes we could have seen those epic matchups in the national championship game. That Penn State offense against the Black Shirts. That great Michigan defense matched up against QB Scott Frost and RB Lawrence Phillips. Sadly, “they” didn’t have the common sense to make that happen.
That 11-year old boy was of course me. Today I am going to make another attempt to share my common sense ideas to improve the ways “they” determine a national champion. Thankfully we do have an actual playoff, so things are absolutely better. After all, Notre Dame might have been robbed at a shot at a national championship this season but they were 10-2. I don’t really feel sorry for them because they could have done something about it—beat Miami (10-2) and Texas A&M (11-1). What could that 1994 Penn State team have done differently? Some say had Joe Paterno not called off the dogs against Indiana, they probably would have fared better with the polls, but they still won every single one of their games.
As I started writing this article, my idea if I was the currently non-existent commissioner of college football would be to expand to 24 teams with 10 automatic bids for the highest ranked champion from every conference plus 14 at-large bids to the highest-ranked remaining teams.
Then I heard an even better idea from the man who should be the commissioner of college football, once “they” come to their senses. That man is Rick Neuheisel, and his idea was that the Group of 5 have their own tournament to crown their own national champion. That makes sense but here comes the genius part. The Group of 5 champion moves on to the big table and the 12-team College Football Playoff as the No. 8 seed.
In the next of this two-part series, I’ll share my ideas on how “they” can roll out Neuheisel’s plan.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!