Yardbarker
Yardbarker
x

College football realignment talk is sure to heat up once the national championship is over.  Florida State’s legal battle to leave the ACC will only heighten the narrative of where college football is headed.  With conversations still fresh from the circus of the bowl season opt-outs, transfer portal entries, and NIL demands, there is no better time for me to stand on my own soapbox and cry out for change.

The current trajectory of college football realignment is one that appears to be headed toward a widening of the gap between the haves and have-nots.  My plan will corral and maybe even eliminate many of the ills that plague the sport now, so take a few minutes to read this somewhat controversial but one hundred percent logical college football realignment plan.

Step 1: Eliminate All Current Football Conferences and Start Over

Let’s be frank here.  The Big Three (Big Ten, SEC, and Big XII) each have their perennial cellar dwellars (and honestly, the Big XII is going to be the little brother to the eventual Power 2 conferences).  Allowing these bottom-feeders and revenue-challenged programs to stay in their conferences while expansion brings in other talented (and wealthy) teams will only perpetuate this problem of the rich getting richer while the poor stay hungry.

It also takes seats away from the table that could go to more deserving (translated: income-producing) or willing schools.

No offense meant toward Vanderbilt and Northwestern (among others), but will they ever have a realistic shot at winning even a divisional title when we get to the two super-conference model?  Will they have a legitimate chance at competing for a berth in the expanded playoffs?

And do they even want to compete in that kind of a new-look league?  The cash distributions from television contracts will be great, but can those kinds of schools generate enough resources to be competitive in the NIL space?

Pat Forde wrote an interesting piece for Sports Illustrated where he pitched this very same idea.  He was a little harsher in his criticism of some “undeserving” Power 5 teams (click the link to read what he said), but his point is the same – just because teams have been in the Big Ten and SEC for almost a century does not mean that they deserve to be part of the money-making machine that is modern day college football.

Instead, let’s strip it down and build it back up. (For football only – for the rest of the sports, keep the conferences, but let’s contract them and go back to the way it was with shorter travel itineraries and stronger regional rivalries.  But that’s an entirely different article…)

Step 2: Create Multiple Tiers of Leagues

Back in early December, NCAA President Charlie Baker sent a proposal to all Division I programs that included tiered levels of competition.  His proposal would separate the high-revenue schools from the lower-resourced programs.

Given the current direction of the winds of change, this is a great idea.  It is a model that works on the high school level – keeping similarly sized schools together to play for their own Group championships – so why not bring it to the collegiate level?

If we eliminate conferences and start over, we can then build the tiers accordingly, ensuring that competition levels are more in line than they are now (and where they are heading).

And of course, just like with high school and youth leagues, realigning every few years is recommended.  If a team wins its mid-tier championship every year, then move them up a tier and swap with a program who is struggling.

The top tier can be for the big dogs.  The Alabamas and Georgias and Ohio States and Oregons and Florida States and Clemsons of the football world.  Divide 48 teams into two conferences, a North and a South or an East and a West, and then divide each conference into geographically-based divisions.  Follow the NFL model.

The second tier should be for that next group of mid to lower Power 5 schools and stronger Group of 5 schools, such as Syracuse, Boston College, Indiana, Vanderbilt, Washington State, Tulane, Fresno State, James Madison, and Memphis, to name a few.  The third tier would combine lower G5 schools with FCS schools.

Rounding out the tiers are what make up the current Division II and III levels.

Step 3: Establish a 16-Team Playoff for each Tier

Each tier will have its own 16-game playoff system.  Playoff berths will be awarded the same way that the NFL seeds its teams – with divisional champs and wild cards.  This will eliminate the politics and biases of the polls and instead reward teams who win their divisions and win their games (against other high-quality opponents, since they will only play teams in their tiers).

Each level will have its own national champion.  Yes, the top tier can have its own College Football Super Bowl that will produce the best team in college football (and a lot of media money).  The other tiers obviously are not as good as the top tier, but that’s ok.  A natty is a natty, no matter what “tier” or “division” it is.  The FCS has a playoff every year, and their winner claims a national championship too.  You can’t tell me that North Dakota State players and fans are not proud of their eleven national titles since 2011!

This model eliminates the bowls as we know them.  That’s ok though, as the non-playoff bowls have been riddled with opt-outs and poor attendance for the past few years.  They have become glorified scrimmages, so ditching them is no loss to most college football fans, especially if they are replaced with an on-field playoff. (There will be pushback from the overpaid bowl officials, but remember, we are reorganizing in the best interests of the game, not those who make money off the game.)

Some bowls can still exist in the later rounds of the playoffs, where they will actually matter.  And if we lose the 68 Ventures Bowl, so be it.

Step 4: Elect a Commissioner to Oversee the New Tiers and New Rules

College football needs a commissioner, a Wyatt Earp to tame the “Wild West.”  This is a frequently used phrase right now, but it is as accurate a descriptor as one can use for the current state of affairs in intercollegiate sports, especially football.

The NCAA as a governing body leaves a lot to be desired.  I might even go as far as suggesting that we get rid of the NCAA and their selective governing habits, but perhaps a reorganization is an acceptable plan, as long as there is someone at the top who enforces rules and levies consequence to those who do not follow the rules.

With the establishment of five tiers, there can be five “sub-commissioners.”  There will be more stringent rule changes in this new plan of mine (more on that later), so there will need to be better management.

Step 5: Sign Athletes to Contracts and Regulate NIL and the Transfer Portal

We are already in the age of paying college athletes.  However, with a lack of control from above, NIL and the transfer portal are creating chaos in locker rooms and across rosters.

Stability is needed, not just for the schools, but for the good of the game.

Top level FBS football has become a stepping stone for the NFL, so let’s just embrace that idea and mirror the NFL in terms of how they manage their rosters and pay their players.

If college athletes actually signed contracts, several issues would be addressed.

First of all, NIL would become transparent.  Currently, NIL is being used to lure players away from their current schools, which is against the rules, and it is being used to entice recruits to sign with schools, which is also against the rules.  Conversely, players are making NIL demands, and if they are not met, they are jumping ship and entering the portal.

Look at what happened with Florida State right after the season:

Offering contracts allows players to negotiate their payments while keeping it in the open.  Players will also have options on how long their contracts are (they can sign one, two, three, or four-year deals). And schools can (legally) have a say in the NIL process.

Secondly, signing players to contracts will restrict the transfer portal and regulate player movement.  Players under contract will not be able to change schools (without penalty) until that contract expires.  Just like NFL players who cannot change teams until their contracts are up, college players would have to stay with their teams until the season (or spring, depending on the contract terms) ends.

Free-agency is a by-product of this model, but isn’t that what we have now?  Players enter the portal as free-agents?  However, with contracts, it will be a little more complicated for players to change schools, which might even result in fewer players looking to move.

I am not against the transfer portal – I agree that, under current rules, players should be able to transfer once, especially when circumstances change.  But I do not support a transfer portal that has so few rules and is so haphazardly regulated.

Another positive outcome of signing college players to contracts is the stability it can afford programs, especially those not in the top tier.  If the mid-level schools can sign their players to multi-year contracts, then they can develop them and keep them, the latter of which is a challenge in today’s environment.

Contracts – coupled with a playoff system – can also prevent so many post-season opt-outs and transfers.  If teams are playing meaningful football in December, then players will want to be on the field.  And if they are under contract, they cannot change schools anyway, so they will be more apt to stick it out (especially if money is involved – breach of contract will result in forfeiture of NIL money).

Final Thoughts on My 5-Step College Football Realignment Proposal

I realize that this 5-step college football realignment proposal is not going to happen, at least any time soon.  There is too much money, power, and corruption currently at the top of college football, particularly in the upper echelon of the soon-to-be-Power 4 conferences.

Those men are the ones who will prevent a real change – a logical change that considers all levels, not just the top – in planning a college football landscape shift that could benefit all its members.  Instead of being proactive, the NCAA will be reactive and let things happen.

So get ready for a prolonged battle between Florida State and the ACC, one that should end with FSU getting out of the league sooner rather than later.  Once that happens, the rest of the dominoes will fall and the ACC will be relegated to G5 status, if it even survives at all.

The top ACC brands will end up in the Big Ten or SEC, and a few middle-of-the-packers will land in the Big XII, which will then be the third wheel to the P2 machine.

And NIL will continue to be an albatross as programs try to navigate its waters with no beacon to guide them.  The transfer portal will still wreak havoc on rosters, and bowl opt-outs will continue (except with the twelve teams in the expanded playoffs).

Tell me again how this is good for college football?

As a Virginia Tech grad and a passionate fan, I can only hope that the Hokies survive the mayhem and be a somewhat competitive program in the likely future of college football chaos.

Without any guidance or directives from above, sadly, there will be no other choice but to buckle up and hope for the best.  I won’t hold my breath for any real change that will benefit all – if I do, I will end up dead like the PAC-12.

To read more of my college football articles, click here.

This article first appeared on Gridiron Heroics and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

TODAY'S BEST

Cowboys WR CeeDee Lamb sends strong message after tempers flare at training camp
NFL

Cowboys WR CeeDee Lamb sends strong message after tempers flare at training camp

Dallas Cowboys wide receiver CeeDee Lamb reminded teammates to keep their cool after the team had multiple skirmishes during the first two days of training camp. Rookie defensive end Donovan Ezeiruaku and tight end Brevyn Spann-Ford got involved in a brief scuffle on Tuesday. At the following practice on Wednesday, a fight broke out between safety Markquese Bell and TE Tyler Neville. New head coach Brian Schottenheimer then stopped practice and pulled the whole team together. He said the next player who threw a punch would be kicked out of practice (via Joseph Hoyt of The Dallas Morning News). "We've got to be professional," Lamb said of the incident after practice, per ESPN's Todd Archer. "I get it that we have a lot of animosity and tension between us and understanding that we want to proclaim our dominance and show like aggressiveness on both sides of the ball, but then again, to what extent?" Fighting in training camp isn't uncommon. It's an intense environment. Many are trying to prove themselves before teams trim their rosters to 53 players. However, too much brawling can threaten to tear a locker room apart. A lack of discipline was also one reason the Cowboys replaced Mike McCarthy with Schottenheimer this offseason. According to NFLPenalties.com, Dallas drew the league's sixth-most flags (128) last season. Per Archer, there were no more fights after Schottenheimer pulled the team aside. Still, the incidents raise questions about his ability to maintain control. The coach spent Wednesday morning's meeting discussing two plays where DE Sam Williams was too physical and sent to the sideline. His players must not have received the message. It's good for Dallas that Lamb seems to be echoing Schottenheimer's sentiments, but the rookie HC still must get through to his team. Rebounding from a 7-10 season could already prove challenging for the Cowboys. As of Wednesday, ESPN's Football Power Index gives Dallas a 34.5% chance to make the playoffs. Infighting will make that even more difficult.

Carter Hart, others found not guilty in Hockey Canada sexual assault trial
NHL

Carter Hart, others found not guilty in Hockey Canada sexual assault trial

Carter Hart, Dillon Dube, Callan Foote, Michael McLeod and Alex Formenton have been found not guilty by Justice Maria Carroccia in London, Ontario, according to reporting from The Athletic, after being charged in connection with an alleged sexual assault involving the 2018 Canadian men’s national junior team. Carroccia said that she did not find E.M.’s [the alleged victim] evidence “credible or reliable,” in explaining her reasoning. “Having found that I cannot rely upon the evidence of E.M. and then considering the evidence in this trial as a whole, I conclude that the Crown cannot meet its onus on any of the counts before me,” Carroccia said. The allegations against Dube, Foote, Formenton, Hart and McLeod first became public in May of 2022, when reports emerged that Hockey Canada had paid to settle a lawsuit with a woman, known in court documents as E.M., who said she was sexually assaulted by eight players “over several hours” in a London hotel room on July 18, 2018. No charges were levied as a result of the initial investigation by local police, which was closed in February 2019, but the case was reopened after the 2022 report. Formal charges were then brought against the five defendants on Jan. 30, 2024. The trial began on April 22, 2025, and the verdicts were reached solely by Justice Carroccia after two mistrials influenced her to dismiss the jury. The NHL does not have a formal policy for players accused of or charged with domestic violence, sexual assault or similar crimes. Instead, the four players who were under NHL contracts at the time – Dube, Foote, Hart and McLeod – were granted indefinite leaves of absence by their clubs shortly before the charges were announced. All of them were pending restricted free agents on expiring contracts and were not extended qualifying offers, making them unrestricted free agents as of July 1, 2024. When asked about the playing eligibility of the defendants, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman has continually deferred action until after a verdict was reached. While none of the players are formally suspended by the league, similar situations have routinely required some sort of permission from league offices for them to play in or return to the NHL. If teams approach any of them with a contract offer, they will presumably wait for that guidance before registering the deal.

Oilers Fall Short in NHL Offseason Ranking
NHL

Oilers Fall Short in NHL Offseason Ranking

The Edmonton Oilers came so close to winning a title this year, but they fell in the Stanley Cup Final once again. For the second straight season, Edmonton wasn't able to get over the hump and they now face some big questions going forward. The front office entered the offseason with the intent to upgrade the roster, but so far, that hasn't happened. The Oilers haven't done very much to improve the team, and they still have some glaring holes along the roster. Due to the inactivity, NHL writer Adam Gretz of Bleacher Report has given them a letter grade of "C" for the offseason. Gretz graded every NHL team on their summer so far, and the Oilers have fallen behind other teams. "The goaltending issues are still a glaring weakness here that needs to be addressed. The answer is not on the roster. The other big elephant in the room that needs to be addressed is the fact that Connor McDavid is entering the final year of his contract and no extension has been signed yet," Gretz wrote. As Gretz mentions, the situation around star Connor McDavid is something to keep an eye on. McDavid wants to win at the highest level, and he will be entering the final year of his contract. If the Oilers don't solve some of the roster issues, it could see McDavid potentially leave the organization next summer. Some around the league believe that McDavid will at least test free agency, to see what else could be out there. This puts even more pressure on the Oilers' front office to make some moves this offseason, with the fate of McDavid hanging in the balance. So far, the team hasn't done much, but there is still plenty of time to change the narrative around the summer.

MLB Insider Proposes Wild Seattle Mariners Trade That Fans Can't Believe
MLB

MLB Insider Proposes Wild Seattle Mariners Trade That Fans Can't Believe

The Seattle Mariners have been heavily linked to Arizona Diamondbacks' third baseman Eugenio Suarez as the trade deadline comes up on July 31. Suarez, 34, is putting together a sensational season season for Arizona, and his 36 home runs trail only Shohei Ohtani in the National League. His 86 RBIs lead baseball entering play on Thursday. He would be a major upgrade to the Mariners lineup, and it would reunite him in the clubhouse, where he played for the M's in 2022 and 2023. As for what it will cost the M's to get Suarez? That's a bit of a guessing game, but the M's do have several interesting pieces to offer the D-backs. Seattle has eight top 100 prospects, and a few intriguing young big-leaguers like Logan Evans. However, former executive Jim Bowden of The Athletic wants the Mariners to make a wild trade for Suarez, as he wrote on Thursday: A package highlighted by middle infielder Michael Arroyo and right-hander Ryan Sloan could be enough to get a deal done. Arroyo, 20, has reached base at a .417 clip this season between High A and Double A. He has 17 homers and 49 RBIs. A second-round pick in 2024, Sloan has a 3.43 ERA over 15 starts this season at Low A. The 19-year-old has logged a strikeout-to-walk ratio of 5.82. Arroyo is currently ranked as the No. 60 prospect in baseball, per MLB Pipeline, and Sloan is ranked No. 61. While the Diamondbacks can ask for that package, it certainly doesn't seem likely. For comparison, the Mariners acquired Luis Castillo at the 2022 trade deadline. That did cost them two Top-100 prospects (Edwin Arroyo and Noelvi Marte), but Castillo was younger, a pitcher, and under control for 1.5 more years. I just can't see the M's making a deal like this for a player five years older who is a rental. Mariners fans couldn't believe it, either: Per @HairlineSports on social media: I’m not even a SEA fan and the package you have them giving up is about 5x more than any other team (Jaxon) wiggins for Geno is enough but Ms have to add BOTH Arroyo and Sloan LOL Sloan might be SP1 for prospects a year from now From Travis Olson: What the hell are you talking about. So you have the mariners giving up two prospects in the top 79 in baseball. Meanwhile the Yankees give up no top 100 prospects. Come on. East coast bias much.