3 Reasons Why Conor Garland Is Still a Canucks’ Value Piece

There’s been a lot of talk lately about whether the Vancouver Canucks should move Conor Garland while his trade value is high. But not everyone’s convinced that’s the right play—and frankly, they might have a point. Garland might not be the flashiest scorer on the roster, but he’s the kind of player good teams need to keep around.

Here’s why Garland should be highly valued:

Reason 1. He’s a Culture Guy—and the Canucks Need That

In a season full of ups, downs, and drama, Garland quietly held things together. As one fan put it, he’s a “glue guy”—someone who brings energy, effort, and the kind of team-first mentality that coaches love. His relentless motor, positive attitude, and willingness to battle through tough games send the right message in a locker room trying to build something sustainable.

This team doesn’t need to blow up the room every offseason. Sometimes, keeping players who help maintain stability and set the tone—especially for younger guys—is just as important as chasing big names in free agency.

Reason 2. Garland Is Still Producing—and Evolving

Garland isn’t just vibes and hustle. He quietly put up 50 points (19G, 31A) this past season while playing a responsible two-way game. He also registered 171 shots, 49 hits, and 58 blocked shots, showing how active and reliable he is on both sides of the puck.

And while 29 isn’t young in NHL years, it’s not ancient either. Garland turns 30 late next season, and he’s shown no sign of slowing down. If anything, his game has matured. He’s learned how to contribute in different roles, move up and down the lineup, and still make an impact.

Reason 3. Garland Fits the Canucks’ Current Direction

The front office has made it clear: the team isn’t going through a rebuild. Vancouver is trying to win now, and Garland fits that timeline. His contract (just under $5 million) is fair value for a player giving you 50 points, strong effort, and flexibility. He’s not an elite star, but he doesn’t need to be. He’s a dependable middle-six forward on a team that needs exactly that.

Yes, you could trade him. But unless the return is significant, you’re likely creating a hole that’s harder (and more expensive) to fill than it seems.