
The Florida Panthers made one of the more interesting decisions at the NHL trade deadline when they chose not to move veteran goaltender Sergei Bobrovsky. Instead of dealing the two-time Stanley Cup champion netminder, the team opted to keep him and attempt to work toward a contract extension. However, recent reports suggest the two sides remain far apart in negotiations, raising the question: Did the Panthers miss their chance to maximize his value?
Bobrovsky, now 37, is playing the final season of the seven-year, $70 million contract he signed with Florida in 2019 and will become an unrestricted free agent this summer.
According to NHL insider reports, Bobrovsky’s team had requested a long-term contract extension similar to the deal that veteran forward Brad Marchand received from the Florida team. Marchand had signed a six-year contract worth $31.5 million, with an average salary of $5.25 million.
While it is true that the Panthers have shown willingness to offer long-term extensions to veteran players, it is quite obvious that they are being much more cautious in their negotiations with Bobrovsky.
Rather than offer another long-term contract to a goalie who is nearing his late 30s, it is believed that the team is looking to offer Bobrovsky a shorter contract, likely within the two- to three-year range. This has become one of the major issues within negotiations.
While it is true that Bobrovsky has been one of the cornerstones of this franchise and has led this team to multiple Stanley Cup appearances, it is also true that goalies tend to fall off quite quickly as they approach their 40s.
Leading up to the trade deadline, multiple teams reportedly called Florida about Bobrovsky as the Panthers explored the market while contract talks stalled.
Ultimately, general manager Bill Zito decided not to move his veteran starter.
“Sergei is a part of our franchise…we want to try to keep him,” Zito said after the deadline passed, indicating the organization still hopes to reach an agreement.
The decision made sense from a cultural standpoint. Bobrovsky has been instrumental in the Panthers’ success over the past several seasons and helped backstop the team to multiple deep playoff runs and championships.
Still, by holding onto him without a contract in place, the Panthers now risk losing him for nothing in free agency.
And that’s where the argument begins.
If the Panthers were aware that negotiations would not be easy, then perhaps the trade deadline would have been a good time to trade Bobrovsky and gain assets for the future.
Championship-caliber goaltenders are hard to find on the trade market, and contenders in search of a stable presence in net may have been willing to give up a lot to get Bobrovsky.
However, it’s also possible that the Panthers’ management thinks that their window to contend is still open. Trading Bobrovsky would indicate that they are taking a step backward, and it’s clear that they are not ready to do that yet.
The next few months will prove whether this gamble pays off.
If they are able to close this gap and secure Bobrovsky on a shorter deal, it will prove to have been the right call.
However, if they are unable to do so and Bobrovsky is allowed to leave in free agency this summer, they will look back on this trade deadline in 2026 and question whether they passed up an opportunity.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!