
The Montreal Canadiens have had a curious start to the 2026-27 season. The club hasn’t performed poorly. In some respects, they’ve done quite admirably. Yet they rank seventh in the Atlantic Division. The fine margins are what’s bringing them down. Here is what has worked and what hasn’t in their recent battles.
If we can say one thing about Montreal after the last four games, it’s that the team is trying. They’re really, really trying. On Oct. 8 against the Nashville Predators and including their Oct. 14 loss to the Washington Capitals, the Canadiens created more than enough scoring chances to win all four.
The contest versus Nashville (a 5-2 defeat) was a head-scratcher. The Canadiens barraged Predators netminder Juuse Saros with 33 shots on target. Cole Caufield led the team with six shots, and Juraj Slafkovsky was behind him with four. Ten shots from two offensively gifted stars should be just what the doctor ordered, but neither found the back of the net. Caufield was a minus-1 and Slafkovsky a minus-2. Two empty-net goals by the Predators make the numbers seem worse, but facts are facts.
Hosting the Detroit Red Wings (a 1-0 shootout win), Montreal was bitten by a notorious bug: the disallowed goal. Not once, not twice, but thrice, three goals were disallowed in this one, including in the extra frame. To be fair, none should have counted, but it’s an indication that the team was doing enough to see the biscuit enter the basket. Once again, Montreal fired a lot, this time 30 shots. Caufield had six again and again couldn’t score, at least not one that counted.
Versus the Buffalo Sabres, the Canadiens were flustered by one of the great goalkeeping performances of the young season, courtesy of Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen. He was sensational, parrying 35 of 38 shots, including several highlight-reel saves, maybe even a “best stops of the season” reel. The contest would not have required overtime had it not been for a key block with literally seconds left in regulation.
Things were a bit better the next evening in Washington (a 5-4 loss). The Canadiens netted four goals – all in regulation – on 30 shots. Nonetheless, Capitals goalie Charlie Lindgren made some remarkable saves, including a breathtaking block on a rebound fired by Chris Kreider in the middle frame.
Four games, 131 shots on net and nine goals to show for it. That’s a 6.87 percent shooting efficiency. Against the Pittsburgh Penguins on Oct. 3, the Canadiens lit the lamp five times, bolstering their overall shooting percentage to 10.5 percent. Even then, that figure lands them no better than 23rd in the NHL. In 2025-26, they finished second with 12.9 percent.
Teams have stars and unsung heroes; the secret sauce to a club’s success. In Montreal’s case, it is Josh Anderson and Zachary Bolduc. Bolduc continues to prove a point I made a few days ago here: Zachary Bolduc Proving His Value as Canadiens Struggle. He’s fifth on the team in points with five (three goals and two assists) and sports a healthy plus-2.
Anderson continues his streaky ways. He probably will not finish third in points, but that’s where he sits, with six points (four goals and two assists). Furthermore, he was outright robbed by goalies in some of the matches referenced above and could have put more points on the board. Did he not because he’s not that kind of player, or was he “goalied” like so many of his teammates? Questions, questions…
It’s a good thing those two are having a stellar October. Ivan Demidov has been nursing an injury since Oct. 3, Slafkovsky is a minus-2 and has netted only one goal, and Caufield has been fine if unspectacular with four points (three goals, one assist) and a minus-1.
Goaltending is a dicey topic in Montreal. Fellow Canadiens scribe William Bourget penned an article about the club’s predicament. Samuel Montembeault is injured, and Jakub Dobes, who was the hot new thing not too long ago when he supplanted Montembeault for the number one job, is now criticized as the masses fall in love with Jacob Fowler.
True enough, Dobes’ numbers do not impress. A 4.63 goals-against average (GAA) and an .841 save percentage (SV%) through four matches won’t strike fear into opposing attackers. And yes, he should have stopped Alex Tuch on that second-period shorthanded chance. But both keepers – and Fowler’s statistics are quite strong – have been victims of a recurring theme: shots from distance.
Whether shots from the blue line or a foot or two in front – penalty kill or otherwise – Montreal concedes a lot of goals from a distance. Nashville scored a pair, Buffalo three, and Washington’s game-winner was similar.
This isn’t solely on the netminders. Shots from distance are often deflections. If not deflected, they are screened, leaving the goalie to make a blind, hapless attempt to shield the net. This can be defended against, but it requires repetition in practice. Even then, it won’t guarantee perfect results during game situations. But as it stands, the Canadiens are poor at defending those attempts.
The Canadiens don’t have to improve much to revert to their consistent winning ways. A lot of their statistics look good. The eye test says they look good. Fowler looks good. Nick Suzuki looks good. Despite those realities, Montreal is struggling.
To emphasize the overall argument, only two of their seven games have been decided by more than one goal. Want more? In both cases, the breathing room was delivered by empty-netters. The Canadiens are close to being very good but must find ways to make the fine margins favour them rather than the opposition.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!