Yardbarker
x
Canadiens’ Laine Represents a Low-Risk Trade Deadline Addition
Montreal Canadiens right wing Patrik Laine (David Kirouac-Imagn Images)

If Montreal Canadiens forward Patrik Laine had been healthy a few days ago, the Winnipeg Jets would have been the perfect team for him to face in his hypothetical first game back from injury. After all, they did draft him once upon a time. And, following an impressive 3-0-1 stretch heading into the Olympics on the part of the Habs, the Jets, who are now 22-26-8 and well out of playoff contention, represented a weak opponent in a (relatively) pressure-free game. Case in point, head coach Martin St. Louis made the generally unpopular decision to go back to goalie Sam Montembeault, who rewarded the team with arguably his best game of the season. Why can’t Laine do the same under similar circumstances?

Playing Montembeault Works Out for Canadiens

While you are always looking for the two points, especially in a tight Atlantic Division, St. Louis went with the goalie who has struggled significantly. It wasn’t as much of a risk as it may appear at face value, seeing as Jakub Dobes hadn’t been as impressive in his last game out in net as he had in the three previous games (three wins in a row), and it’s been proven that his save percentage drops dramatically when he’s played too often. What makes the decision to go with Montembeault especially noteworthy is there was one game to go before the Olympic break. Surely Dobes could have eked out another win?

And, surely, if you were going against the grain to play Montembeault, you could have found room to play Laine, who led the Canadiens with 15 power-play goals last season despite missing 30 games due to injury? Ultimately though, Laine hasn’t been cleared yet since requiring core-muscle surgery following a second consecutive early-season injury. So, it’s in one way a moot point, but there have been suggestions in the media that, even if Laine were healthy, the Habs would prefer to sit him.

Taking it one step further, Sportsnet’s Nick Kypreos reported the Canadiens are prepared to retain salary to move him. However, keep in mind, Kypreos also opined the Habs might be willing to add in an asset to facilitate a trade, while Eric Engels, who specifically covers the team for Sportsnet, reported in one of the pieces linked to above that his sources say an extra asset isn’t on the table.

So, take it all with a grain of salt. However, it’s easy to understand why the Canadiens would want to trade Laine based on his forward-group-leading $8.7 million cap hit, how he played down the lineup primarily with Jake Evans and Josh Anderson the few games he had been healthy and how the Habs have the third-most-prolific offense in the NHL (3.46 goals per game) without him, for all intents and purposes.

The overriding argument is in effect the Canadiens don’t need Laine and they’d prefer to have cap space back, conceivably to fill other holes in the lineup ahead of the March 6 trade deadline. The ironic part is the biggest hole the Canadiens have is in Montembeault’s net… and, his win over the Jets notwithstanding, until they are confident that need has been addressed, it’s an arguable fool’s errand to add other pieces in a bid to win it all this year of all years.

Where Laine Fits in Canadiens’ Lineup

In an ideal world, Laine would represent a scoring threat at the bottom of the lineup when healthy, especially seeing as there isn’t room for him at the top. There had been a preseason experiment placing him opposite rookie Demidov on a line centred by Kirby Dach, but saddling the former with two reclamation projects looked like a disaster in the making. After the Canadiens sustained multiple injuries at the start of the season (including to Laine), Demidov formed a relatively strong line with Juraj Slafkovsky and fellow-rookie Oliver Kapanen. Meanwhile, since returning from his own injury, Dach has gotten reps on the top line with Nick Suzuki and Cole Caufield with encouraging results reminiscent of how the three gelled in Dach’s first season as a Hab in 2022-23.

So, even if St. Louis felt like Laine could keep up on either line, there just isn’t room, making someone like Joe Veleno the most expendable forward at this juncture. However, despite Veleno’s disappointing production, albeit in just 12:14 of ice time per game, he’s seemingly endeared himself to St. Louis (from ‘Joe Veleno’s role with Canadiens comes into sharper focus,’ Montreal Gazette, Dec. 5, 2025).

Feel free to make your case as to why Veleno doesn’t fit on this team in the comments, but he nevertheless seems entrenched where he is, until Alex Newhook returns from his own injury, at least. And, seeing as Newhook, who scored 12 points in 17 games playing with Demidov before breaking his ankle, fits more the profile of a player versatile enough to play anywhere in the lineup, he’s more so the deadline “acquisition” whose return to action Canadiens fans are anticipating more.

Undeniably, it would be great to see Laine help take the Canadiens’ power play up another level. However, it’s his play at even strength that makes him a liability, at least in St. Louis’ eyes. It’s an odd thing when all signs point to the Habs actively walking away from Laine in a minimalistic bottom-six role though, when they keep returning to Montembeault in net, where the fate of the team typically rests.

Obviously, it’s not a perfect comparison in that they need two goalies (and permanently promoting prospect Jacob Fowler shouldn’t be in the cards). With a 23.9% power-play unit, they’ve proven they don’t need Laine as part of a filled-to-the-brim offense, especially with Newhook set to return eventually. However, there’s always the possibility that Montembeault will be given back the net once NHL action returns, in the hopes he’s rediscovered his game, when Dobes has done nothing to lose it. If that happens and Montembeault plays the first game back after the break, the double standard will be plain to see.

Laine a Potential Insurance Policy

To continue to play devil’s advocate, one of the reasons cited as to why Laine would be attractive to suitors on the trade market would be the small risk they’d absorb as he approaches unrestricted free agency. The same argument holds true for the Canadiens though, in that they can and probably will just walk away come July 1. Why not keep Laine in the fold as someone who can step in, in case injuries pile up down the stretch. It’s not like it hasn’t happened before.

Are the Canadiens so set on parting ways with a proven power-play weapon, without whom they wouldn’t have made the postseason last year? Retaining his salary only means they’ll be paying him to play for someone else when it’s far from guaranteed they can acquire someone else capable of fitting in seamlessly with the Habs at the deadline with the half of his cap hit that they’d be shedding.

Sure, some may say they’re better without him. Of course, those who make that argument conveniently disregard how the Canadiens played .620 hockey with Laine in the lineup last year (when they had been last in the Eastern Conference before he debuted). So, he was hardly the detriment some in the media made him out to be. Maybe, just maybe they can find a way to get him in the lineup once he’s finally cleared, presumably following the Olympic break, and not just to showcase him for the purposes of potentially trading him. If they can keep an open mind with regard to Montembeault, they should be able to with regard to Laine.

There really wouldn’t be a good reason why not. As long as he were healthy, obviously.

This article first appeared on The Hockey Writers and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!