x
Connor Ingram’s Best Games Depend on More Than Just Saves
Walter Tychnowicz-Imagn Images

Connor Ingram’s game log since late February reads like an object lesson in how much a goalie depends on the five men ahead of him. Fifteen starts from Feb 25 to Mar 31, 2026, a 9-6 record, and a stack of full 60‑minute nights tells you two things right away. He’s durable, and he gives Edmonton a real chance to win most nights.

Put him in front of a disciplined structure, and he’s textbook. He plays good angles, has rebound control, and shows the kind of calm reads that make you sip your coffee and feel reasonably optimistic.

Ingram Has Had a Few Clean Games, Which Suggests a Pattern

Look at the clean nights, and you see the pattern. Games like Feb. 26 at LA (1 GA on 21 shots) and Mar. 15 vs. Nashville (1 GA on 26 shots) show the tidy Ingram. With average shot volumes and minimal second chances, his saves look routine. He’s square, prepared and tidy through traffic.

He’s also eaten minutes too. He has put up 10 full 60‑minute games and an overall workload of around 58 minutes, which is exactly what coaches want from a guy you call your starter.

There’s Another Half of Ingram’s Story That’s an Issue

But the other half of the story is obvious and a little worrying. A cluster of rough nights — Feb. 28 at San Jose (5 GA on 33 shots), Mar. 3 vs. Ottawa (4 GA on 21 shots), Mar. 19 vs. Florida (4 GA on 23 shots) — aren’t all about shot totals. Several of those games featured modest shot counts yet spiky goal totals, which tells you the problem isn’t always about volume; it’s about shot quality and chaos.

Screens, rebounds not being cleared, repeat entries and sustained pressure have a habit of turning tidy box scores into multi‑goal affairs. That’s a classic team‑dependent goalie profile. When the team defends structure and limits high‑danger chances, the goalie looks very good. Yet, when the team lets the game become a mess, the goalie’s numbers suffer.

Ingram Has Been Up and Down in His Performance

There’s a pattern of inconsistency, too. There are periods of steady, comforting play followed by nights that force you to recheck what went wrong. That makes roster decisions trickier. You can’t always predict whether you’ll get the composed Ingram or the spiky Ingram.

It also suggests the remedy isn’t necessarily swapping goalies; it’s fixing the things in front of him.

So what should the team prioritize? First, rebound and crease control. Many of the rough nights read like rebound bingo for opponents. Second, gap control and neutral‑zone exits. Often, turnovers lead to odd‑man entries, which are recurring enemies. Third, matchup and workload management show that Ingram can handle a starter’s minutes, but tempering exposure on brutal back‑to‑back stretches makes sense.

What Can the Oilers’ Coaching Staff Do to Help Ingram Succeed?

The coaching staff can also shelter him from the heaviest shots from teams or steady downplays that invite chaos. Pair Ingram with a defensive focus on clearing lanes and limiting sustained zone time, and you likely see his baseline lift and the ugly nights lessen.

The bottom line is that Ingram isn’t a miracle fix. Instead, he’s a dependable starter when the Oilers play organized hockey in front of him and vulnerable when they don’t. That’s not a damning verdict; it’s a useful one.

Fix the team’s play, and Ingram becomes a very good steadying presence. However, leave the defensive holes, and those spiky nights turn from occasional to expected.

This article first appeared on NHL Trade Talk and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!