Yardbarker
Yardbarker
x
Criticisms of Maple Leafs’ Effort Are Off-Base
John E. Sokolowski-USA TODAY Sports

Toronto Maple Leafs head Coach Sheldon Keefe has been criticized for his statement following his team’s 3-1 loss to the Boston Bruins in Game 4 of the Stanley Cup Playoffs. 

When asked about his team’s effort following the loss, Keefe responded, “Nothing wrong with our effort level here tonight. Guys are competing. It’s physical hockey. Guys are trying. It’s a good team over there. It’s limiting us. You can question a lot of things, can’t question the effort.”

The media has condemned Keefe for those comments. We even heard one ex-NHLer say on talk radio that if Keefe thinks that he is out of touch with reality. 

Critiques of the Maple Leafs’ Efforts Are Off-Base

In the wake of the Maple Leafs’ recent playoff loss to the Bruins, Keefe has come under scrutiny for his remarks on the team’s effort. His assertion that “nothing wrong with our effort level here tonight” sparked controversy, with critics questioning his grasp on reality. However, amidst all this backlash, we defend Keefe’s assessment.

He was dead on about his players’ effort. It is difficult to believe that a professional NHL player playing in a playoff game would not give his best effort. We would also like to ask all of the former NHL payers who are now involved in the media if they ever played a single NHL postseason game in which they went out and didn’t try to win. 

Let’s shake the tree of Stanley Cup competition for a minute. There are many reasons why teams lose and players fail. Every team except for one fails. More generally, not just some of us but everyone fails. Even great hockey teams don’t win all the time. In any competition, there’s more than one player or team competing. One team will win, and one will lose.  

Granted, there might come a time when players or teams realize they can’t win and might give up in those moments and accept defeat. Yet, they still gave it their best effort up to that point. We don’t believe any player on the Maple Leafs is yet at that point.  

With the Maple Leafs, we see a team that wants to win and is giving their all in trying to do so. So does Keefe. What they are doing isn’t working. They are making mistakes. They are not scoring enough. They are losing puck battles. The reasons they are losing are numerous. Effort is not one of them. 

Would Any NHL Player Not Try Hard During the Playoffs?

The idea that NHL players would lack effort in a playoff game seems unfathomable. Keefe’s statement resonates with us fundamentally – how could anyone doubt the commitment of these athletes competing at the highest level? As former NHL players turned media personalities condemn Keefe, we are pushed to ask if they ever played a postseason game without giving their all — even if someone else claimed they dialed it in.

It’s crucial to recognize that defeat in sports is multifaceted. Teams lose, players fail, but that’s not indicative of not trying hard. While some players might succumb to the inevitability of defeat, it doesn’t diminish the effort exerted until that final point.

In the case of the Maple Leafs, we see a determined team. They’re striving to win, playing hard, and being publicly frustrated when things don’t work. Yet, despite their best efforts, they are falling short. Mistakes are made, and opportunities are missed, but their effort is not the culprit.

Hockey Analyst Goes Off on Mitch Marner

In the following video, fans can see Paul Bissonnette go off on Mitch Marner during the second intermission of Game 4. His critique was blunt and pointed. But it stepped over the line insofar as calling out Marner’s lack of effort. The mistakes were well explained, and Marner made several of them in the shared taped sequence. 

That said, Bissonnette expressed frustration at what he perceived as Marner’s lack of effort throughout the series. But it is his perception. Criticizing Marner’s technique is different from criticizing his commitment. Pointing out specific mistakes, such as losing puck battles and failing to block shots on the penalty kill, are all fair. His conclusion that Marner did not deserve his ice time and should be benched to set an example is what he’s paid to do as an analyst. His commentary left no doubt about his belief that Marner’s effort was inadequate and unacceptable. 

Bissonnette Does Not Know Marner’s Effort Level

Yet, Bissonnette doesn’t know what Marner’s effort was. And that was his error. It’s fair for him to criticize the Maple Leafs’ lack of success, but Marner’s effort level is not his to know. 

Coach Keefe’s defense of his players’ “try” reflects a fundamental truth about professional sports – effort alone does not guarantee victory. As the Maple Leafs face tonight’s Game 5 challenges, they must address their shortcomings and adapt their strategies. However, undermining players’ dedication or questioning their desire to win likely shows more of the accuser’s frustration than the Maple Leafs’ players. 

In a game where success is elusive and defeat is a reality, we believe the players’ effort remains the driving force behind their engagement with the game.

It’s Only Fair Game to Call Out Those Who Call Out Others

There is logic to the idea that if someone feels justified in criticizing a player’s or a team’s effort, they should be open to scrutiny regarding their own efforts. It’s a form of accountability and fairness. If one is quick to point fingers at others, they should also be willing to turn that same scrutiny inward.

In sports commentary, former players who have become media personalities sometimes critique teams and players for their perceived lack of effort. However, if these individuals once stood on the same ice surface, it’s reasonable to question whether they ever experienced moments of struggle or faltered in their efforts.

Listening to Bissonnette’s rant about Marner is great entertainment. It also likely expresses the frustrations that many of us, as fans, think about our team’s lack of success. But that doesn’t mean he’s right.

The Maple Leafs might lose tonight or sometime down the road in this series. But saying it’s because they don’t care or don’t try hard is cheap analysis. It’s also wrong.

[Note: I want to thank long-time Maple Leafs fan Stan Smith for collaborating with me on this post. Stan’s Facebook profile can be found here.]

This article first appeared on The Hockey Writers and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

TODAY'S BEST

Top NHL Analyst Provides Update on Canucks Possible Offer Sheet for Two Star Players
NHL

Top NHL Analyst Provides Update on Canucks Possible Offer Sheet for Two Star Players

Top NHL analyst Stephan Roget of 'Canucks Army' believes the Canucks could definitely offer sheet Mason McTavish or Marco Rossi, but they likely won't. Offer sheets remain one of the less common NHL deals, so a midsummer offer sheet from the Vancouver Canucks would remain highly unlikely. The player must be a restricted free agent (RFA) to be offer-sheet eligible, and come mid-July, there are not many remaining who are. Two of them are strong possibilities for whom the Canucks would consider making an offer sheet: Anaheim Ducks' Mason McTavish and Minnesota Wild's Marco Rossi. And offer sheets are a two-part process. Your team has to first make an offer. And then there has to be acceptance of a player before his current team is in a position to counter. That is uncertainty enough. Any offer sheet from the Canucks would have to be at least $11.7 million per year The Canucks would only be able to give Mason McTavish or Marco Rossi at the absolute highest compensation level, above $11.7 million annually. That would cost four protected first-rounders across five drafts to the Canucks. While both Rossi and McTavish would certainly appreciate an offer of this nature, whether either is truly worth this kind of investment of this size, especially for Vancouver, a club not comfortably in a playoff position, is questionable. 'As it stands, the Canucks are still eligible to make offer sheets to McTavish and Rossi - but only certain offer sheets. 'Whether it's realistic to expect a mid-summer offer sheet from the Canucks, is no'. - Stephan Roget Bottom line: While theoretically, a Canucks summer offer sheet is conceivable, too high a price, in cap space and future equity, makes it extremely unlikely, per NHL analyst Stephan Roget of 'Canucks Army.'

Bengals finally reach agreement with first-rounder Shemar Stewart
NFL

Bengals finally reach agreement with first-rounder Shemar Stewart

The Cincinnati Bengals have finally reached an agreement with first-round pick Shemar Stewart, putting an end to what became the story of the offseason for the team. Stewart, drafted 17th overall in this year's draft, has finally agreed to a four-year, fully guaranteed $18.97 million deal that includes a $10.4 million signing bonus, according to his agent Zac Hiller of LAA. Now with this deal done, every first-round pick is signed. The road to this deal was a bumpy ride. For months, negotiations between Stewart’s camp and the Bengals front office stalled due to disagreements over contract language, particularly around guarantees. The team pushed to include contract language that could void the deal under certain off-field circumstances, but since other Bengals first-round picks did not face similar terms, Stewart stood firm and refused to sign. Both sides remained firm throughout the offseason, leading to a long standoff and a lot of reports of frustration from both sides. Despite the frustration and disagreement, the Bengals and Stewart’s group continued to engage in conversations, trying to find a resolution to the issue. And finally, after weeks of back and forth and weeks of controversy surrounding what Stewart may be forced to do, both parties appear to have met in the middle and found common ground. For the Bengals, getting Stewart signed and ready for training camp is a major win. Stewart was viewed as a developmental prospect who needed plenty of on-field reps to reach his full potential. Stewart's absence from earlier camps had slowed a lot of his progress. With the contract dispute resolved, he can now focus entirely on gaining important reps and continuing his development over the coming weeks. Now with this contract done and over with, the team can put their full focus on Trey Hendrickson, who is also seeking a long term deal. If the Bengals can get a deal done with Trey before the season kicks off, they would secure their edge-rushing room for not only 2025, but for years beyond. For a team looking to go all in on making the playoffs, signing Stewart was long overdue. Now it will be vital for the team to get Stewart up to speed with the rest of the roster, and allow him to get as many reps as possible before the 2025 season begins.

Wrestling legend Hulk Hogan leaves behind a complicated legacy
Wrestling

Wrestling legend Hulk Hogan leaves behind a complicated legacy

On Thursday, wrestling icon Terry "Hulk Hogan" Bollea died at the age of 71. "WWE is saddened to learn WWE Hall of Famer Hulk Hogan has passed away," the company said in a statement. "One of pop culture’s most recognizable figures, Hogan helped WWE achieve global recognition in the 1980s... WWE extends its condolences to Hogan’s family, friends, and fans." Hogan was the first true superstar to emerge in the wrestling industry, capturing a casual audience worldwide and bringing new eyes to the sport. He was an unbelievable draw, both as a baby face and as a heel. From his time as an All-American hero to leading the New World Order and teaming with Randy Savage as part of the "Mega Powers," he has been a staple of the scene for decades. Who can forget his WrestleMania III moment, where he defied the laws of physics to body-slam a 520-pound Andre the Giant? Or, more recently, his match with Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson at WrestleMania 18? His last appearance on WWE RAW on Jan. 6 saw him booed throughout, highlighting the rocky legacy Hogan leaves behind. Hogan's universal popularity has plummeted in recent years, primarily due to a racism scandal that led to his removal from the Wrestling Hall of Fame, only to be reinstated in 2018. Nevertheless, the damage had been done. Hogan's outdated and unwelcome outlook on specific aspects of life derailed the final stanza of a legendary career. Still, there's no denying that without Hogan, the wrestling we know and love today wouldn't exist. There wouldn't be WWE on the world's largest streaming platform, or All Elite Wrestling, which is developing into one of the most successful challenger brands. Instead, there would be smaller, more localized promotions, all competing for a sliver of television time. Hogan popularized the sport by bridging the gap between the wrestling ring and Hollywood. During his time in the spotlight, Hogan appeared in movies such as "Rocky III," "No Holds Barred" and "Suburban Commando," all of which helped bring his larger-than-life persona to a new audience. It's no surprise, then, that The Rock, John Cena and Dave Bautista have all made similar jumps in recent years. Hogan leaves behind an everlasting imprint on the wrestling world. Unfortunately, it comes with multiple asterisks; however, that doesn't change what he achieved as the first global wrestling star.

Warriors' Stephen Curry believes NBA players are 'underpaid'
NBA

Warriors' Stephen Curry believes NBA players are 'underpaid'

Are NBA players underpaid? Golden State Warriors superstar Stephen Curry argues yes. The greatest shooter in NBA history said Thursday on Complex’s “360 With Speedy” that because the league’s current CBA doesn’t allow for current players to invest in league and team equity, players are leaving money on the table. “I would say, yes, we are underpaid,” Curry admitted when asked, despite enormous salaries, if the players were getting short-changed, “because you wanna be able to participate in that rise [of equity].” “It’s a partnership with ownership, [and] it’s a partnership with the league,” the 37-year-old stressed, revealing that league salaries do not reflect players’ impact on team valuations. If anyone has the right to begrudge the current CBA on player participation in equity, it’s Curry. When drafted in 2009, the Warriors were worth $315 million. Current valuations in May of 2025 have the team at $9.4 billion, the most in the league. Curry’s been paid handsomely during his time in Golden State, and he doesn’t overlook it. “I know we’re blessed to be in a position where we’re playing basketball for a living, and these are the type of checks that people are earning,” he told Complex. However, when he signed his $62.6 million one-year extension in 2024 that would keep him in a Warriors’ jersey until 2027, many felt that no amount of money the franchise could offer him would represent his worth. Curry had an undeniable impact on the Warriors’ valuation increasing by nearly 3,000%. He’s benefited by being the most salaried player on the roster and plenty of endorsement deals. But is he getting his fair share? Something similar may happen with reigning NBA Finals MVP and Oklahoma City Thunder guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, who just signed the richest contract in league history with an average annual value of $71.25 million. According to Forbes, the Thunder’s valuation increased 20% from 2023 to 2024 and will likely take another jump after this year’s championship. Curry concedes that player participation in equity isn’t a simple concept and not all markets are created equal: “You got competitive advantage considerations…and want every market to have a fair chance, like I get all that.” He believes, however, that finding a solution is a “mutually beneficial proposition” for players, teams and the league. Even the most expensive people in the world need to find other investors to make owning an NBA team possible. The best example of Curry’s point is the Boston Celtics sale in March. The most-championed franchise in league history was sold to Bill Chisholm for $6.1 billion, the largest ever sports franchise sale in North America at the time. Chisholm needed Rob Hale, Bruce Beal Jr., and private equity firm Sixth Street, to afford the purchase. Because team ownership is already a multi-investor operation, the league could potentially come to an agreement with the players by the next CBA negotiation at the end of the decade. If not, the league's best players will continue to simultaneously earn a ridiculous amount of money, and it will not be nearly enough.