Yardbarker
Yardbarker
x
Flyers’ Hathaway Extension Highlights Flawed Rebuild Approach
Kyle Ross-USA TODAY Sports

On July 1, the Philadelphia Flyers weren’t very busy in free agency. Aside from signing Matvei Michkov to his entry-level contract, they were mostly quiet. Their biggest move of the day other than locking up their superstar prospect was an extension on 32-year-old Garnet Hathaway‘s contract.

Hathaway, with one season still left on his deal, was given a two-year extension by the Flyers worth $2.4 million each season. It’s actually a pretty fair contract at face value, but Philadelphia’s philosophy regarding their veterans shows exactly what is wrong with their rebuild approach—it is flawed.

Rebuilders Can’t Extend Everyone

It should seem like an obvious sentiment that a rebuilder, trying to build for the future, should not give contract extensions to every single one of their depth players. Maybe it’s okay in extreme moderation, but generally, you should want to get draft picks and young players for aging athletes. For whatever reason, the Flyers are not following this path.

Hathaway is a phenomenal player and everything you want out of a bottom-six forward. He is great defensively, he can fight, was on the ice for way more scoring chances than he allowed last season, and he is essentially the perfect veteran leader. However, we must remember that he was a free-agent signing back in 2023—the whole point of signing him, in theory, was to trade him and acquire assets for the trouble. Instead, the Flyers grew attached and are holding onto him through his age-35 campaign.

While there is some value in a player like Hathaway for a rebuilder, the trade value has to be too much to pass up at some point. Beck Malenstyn of the Washington Capitals, a fourth-line winger, returned the 43rd overall pick of the 2024 NHL Draft in a trade. Not only is Hathaway better than him, but Malenstyn was arguably not even the best fourth-line player on his own team—Nic Dowd and Nicolas Aube-Kubel were both probably a little bit better. It’s all just speculation, but that kind of draft capital seems to be what the Flyers gave up.

This isn’t even the first time that the Flyers extended a non-essential roster player until they are 35 in the last few months. On March 6, the Orange and Black gave 31-year-old defender Nick Seeler a four-year extension with his deal set to expire in the 2024 offseason. Again, he is a great player, but we’re dealing with the same situation here.

Two months before that Seeler contract was even signed, I said the following, arguing that the Flyers should look to trade him: “All this is much less about losing a purely hypothetical non-first-round draft pick in a trade [which would have likely been the trade return for Seeler] and more about how this could be a pattern from the front office moving forward. Will they extend other veterans’ expiring contracts?” (From: “Flyers Need to Trade Nick Seeler“).

Here, we are seeing that rhetorical question all the way back from January come to fruition. No, extending Hathaway and Seeler isn’t the end of the world. For their leadership, you can see why Philadelphia would like to have them on the roster as they try to get some growth out of young players like Michkov, Tyson Foerster, Jamie Drysdale, and others. But the issue is that those two aren’t even the only veterans they’re keeping around.

Scott Laughton, who has been in trade rumors for what seems like forever, is still on the team. HockeyViz’s model grades him as one of the worst players in the NHL, which is obviously very bad. Despite that and Hathaway and Seeler having contracts, Laughton seems like he is here to stay.

It’s easy to grow attached to players, especially when you like them as people. At the end of the day, though, hockey is a business. When you are in a rebuild, you can’t hang onto everyone for dear life. Sometimes, you have to learn to let go—the Flyers have not learned to do this.

Flyers Quickly Need to Find Foundational Building Blocks

Patience is obviously required for a rebuild—we all know this. But, in reality, the Flyers have been “rebuilding,” in a sense for the last four seasons. In the 57-year history of the franchise, they are currently in their second-longest playoff drought at four consecutive campaigns—one more miss would tie their record of five. At some point, you really have to indicate that you are building something around Michkov so you can be confident that making the postseason can soon be routine. Right now, the Orange and Black have not done that at all, and they don’t even project to be legitimate contenders in the 19-year-old’s prime.

The best center under the age of 25 aside from Jett Luchanko in the Flyers’ organization is probably either Massimo Rizzo or Owen McLaughlin—they ranked in the fourth and fifth tiers of my recent prospect pyramid. The team needs help, especially on offense but also on defense both now and in the future, and it’s an issue that has yet to be addressed.

So, obviously, the Flyers should be trading their veteran roster players and accruing draft picks and prospects, right? Well, they aren’t doing that at all. Players like Travis Konecny, Joel Farabee, Laughton, Morgan Frost, Rasmus Ristolainen, and others are still on the team. Trading just two or three of those players wouldn’t destroy the team, but it would also make the Orange and Black a contender for a great lottery pick in 2025 on top of the assets they would get in a trade. It’s a stacked centerman class, plus those aforementioned players will likely all be outside of their prime years by the time Michkov enters his. Instead, the Flyers are content with bringing everyone back.

The Flyers apparently think it sounds like a much better idea to let the value of these players deplete, be in the middle of the standings like they were in 2023-24 both next season and in the long term so drafting is harder, and ultimately make no progress toward building a team around Michkov. The wait has already been long enough—it’s time to actually commit to a rebuild so Michkov can consistently compete for championships in his prime. This all starts with trading veterans who probably won’t be all that good in five or so years, but the Flyers are not off to the hottest start with that.

If the Flyers are unwilling to trade a single one of their players, seeing as they have dealt just one roster player since July of 2023, are they really even in the rebuild that they have preached time and time again? Reminiscent of Ron Hextall’s tenure as the general manager (GM) of the Orange and Black, Danny Briere is following in his footsteps. Something has to change soon, or Michkov could suffer the same fate as Claude Giroux—a prime wasted by a lack of urgency upstairs.

This article first appeared on The Hockey Writers and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

TODAY'S BEST

Hurricanes take care of business, sign star winger to lucrative eight-year extension
NHL

Hurricanes take care of business, sign star winger to lucrative eight-year extension

The Hurricanes announced Thursday night that they’ve signed winger Jackson Blake to an eight-year, $45M extension that will kick in for the 2026-27. While that would normally mean an average annual value and cap hit of $5.625M, the actual cap hit of the contract will fall in the $5.1M range due to deferred compensation, Elliotte Friedman of Sportsnet reports. The contract buys out the extent of Blake’s RFA eligibility and will make him a UFA following the 2033-34 season. Blake’s stock has been on the rise since immediately after Carolina selected him in the fourth round in 2021. He was a USHL All-Star in his post-draft season with the Chicago Steel before making the jump to NCAA hockey with North Dakota, where he totaled 102 points in 79 games in two seasons — earning a Hobey Baker finalist nod in his sophomore year. He signed his entry-level contract with the Hurricanes in April 2024 and joined them for the brief remainder of the regular season. In his first full pro season, Blake hit the ground running. He made the Canes out of camp and had five points through his first nine games despite seeing less than 12 minutes of ice time per night. That offense didn’t quite hold up the rest of the way, though. While he ended up seeing significant deployment alongside Sebastian Aho at even strength, he ended up finishing the year with a 17-17–34 scoring line in 80 games, finishing ninth on the team in scoring and ninth in Calder Trophy voting as the league’s Rookie of the Year. That’s fine production, especially considering he averaged under 14 minutes per game on the year. He’ll need to build on it to justify that cap hit, though, especially with so much risk attached to a max-term deal. The good news is that Blake has another year left on his entry-level contract to continue his development before he’ll need to start justifying that cap hit. The son of former NHLer Jason Blake turns 22 next month, yet with this deal, he’s guaranteed to surpass his dad’s career earnings. The Hurricanes have historically opted to sign their young players for as long and as early as possible, a trend that continues here. Sometimes, it’s paid off — their eight-year, $59.4M commitment to Seth Jarvis last offseason looks like a steal after he put up a repeat 67-point performance in 2024-25. There’s also the glaring example of where that strategy has failed regarding center Jesperi Kotkaniemi, whose $4.82M cap hit looks more stomachable now with a rising ceiling but is still well above his market value four years into the deal. The jury is still out on newly acquired Logan Stankoven, who they inked to an eight-year, $48M extension at the beginning of the month. Blake’s deal will be one of the last of its kind. It contains two elements — deferred compensation and an eight-year term — that will be outlawed when the new CBA Memorandum of Understanding takes effect on Sep. 15, 2026. If he waited until reaching RFA status next summer to sign, a lengthy negotiation could have lost him that eighth year if the two sides didn’t come to terms until the beginning of training camp. With the salary cap’s upper limit projected to reach $104M in 2026-27, the Hurricanes have around $16M in projected space with Blake’s and Stankoven’s deals taken care of. While they’re projected to be Carolina’s 11th- and 12th-highest-paid forwards on their opening night roster this season, they’ll be their fifth- and sixth-highest-paid forwards in 2026-27.

Biggest impact of Josh Naylor trade may still be to come
MLB

Biggest impact of Josh Naylor trade may still be to come

While the Seattle Mariners landed an impact bat on Thursday night, their trade for Josh Naylor has also likely impacted the entire upcoming MLB trade deadline. On Thursday, Seattle sent a pair of top pitching prospects to the Arizona Diamondbacks in exchange for Naylor, with left-hander Brandyn Garcia (ranked as Seattle's 13th-best prospect by MLB.com) and right-hander Ashton Izzi (ranked as Seattle's 16th-best prospect by the same rankings) heading to the desert. Knowing what the Diamondbacks received in exchange for Naylor could well set the market for what is to come between now and the conclusion of the 2025 MLB trade deadline, set for 6 p.m. (Eastern) on July 31. The 28-year-old first baseman was ranked by The Athletic as the 17th-best trade candidate likely to be available, but ranked behind just one other first baseman (Baltimore's Ryan O'Hearn, who was slotted in at 16th). If Naylor brought in a pair of pitching prospects, including Garcia, who has appeared in two games this season for Seattle, the Diamondbacks could be salivating over what third baseman Eugenio Suarez and his 36 home runs could bring in return. All MLB teams who will be buying or selling at this year's trade deadline have had the first price bar set for them with the Naylor deal. Now it will be fascinating to see what comes next, especially knowing that Naylor will be a free agent at the end of this season. If Seattle gave up two pitching prospects for a player who could be a late-season rental only, imagine what the Minnesota Twins may be able to recoup for starting pitcher Joe Ryan (under team control through the 2027 season) or the Boston Red Sox might get back for outfielder Jarren Duran, who won't be a free agent until the 2029 campaign. While Naylor may not be the biggest move to come during this span before the trade deadline comes to a close, his deal could be the one that establishes selling prices for the trades that are to come. With so few MLB teams expected to be outright sellers, the price for available talent was expected to be high. We learned on Thursday night with the Naylor swap just how high those prices may go.

Releasing Christian Wilkins Proves Spytek, and the Raiders Mean Business
NFL

Releasing Christian Wilkins Proves Spytek, and the Raiders Mean Business

Since taking over as the general manager of the Las Vegas Raiders, John Spytek and Raiders Head Coach, Pete Carroll, have emphasized how critical it will be for them to establish a new culture for their team. After years of subpar play, the Raiders needed to improve their culture equally as much as they needed to improve their roster. Spytek wasted no time significantly improving the Raiders' roster, adding Geno Smith and Ashton Jeanty this offseason. Although a culture change usually takes more than offseason, the Raiders may have expedited the process by releasing veteran defensive tackle Christian Wilkins. The organization and Wilkins were not on the same page in regard to his rehab, pushing the Raiders to make a drastic move. While drastic, the move appears to align with Spytek's intended composition of the Raiders' roster. At the NFL Combine months before Wilkins' recent release, the Raiders' general manager explained what he would take into consideration when assembling the Raiders' roster. While Spytek likely figured Wilkins would be part of the team at the time, his words rang true following the veteran defensive tackle's release. “I think we're going to have a lot of positive energy. The guys that love to compete and play with passion are going to have a chance at our place. And the guys that maybe don't have that love of the game, they like it, it's a means to an end, there probably won't be as many places or spaces for them at our place," Spytek said. "I think we want to set the tone with our film. When people watch a week or two out for our games coming, like they want to know, like this is going to be a battle, this is going to be physical, this is going to be old-school football." It is challenging to maintain positive energy when a player who has only played five games with the Silver and Black fails to uphold their end of a contract worth over $100 million. Shortly after releasing Wilkins, the Raiders issued the following statement. "We have decided that it is in the best interests of the organization to move on from Christian Wilkins. This franchise has a Commitment to Excellence on and off the field. With no clear path or plan for future return to play from Christian, this transaction is necessary for the entire organization to move forward and prepare for the new season." The Raiders' words spoke loudly enough, but they did not say nearly as loudly as the actual move of releasing Wilkins. Full details of why the Raiders decided to move on from Wilkins after just one season remain unclear, but one thing is clear: the Raiders' new-look front office means business. Find us on X (formerly Twitter) @HondoCarpenter and Instagram @HondoSr and weigh in on this take. While here, check out our Facebook page WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE to discuss this take

Major 2024 NFL free-agency deals are aging very poorly
NFL

Major 2024 NFL free-agency deals are aging very poorly

Several of the high-profile names of the 2024 free-agent class are really struggling to justify the massive contacts they received through the early stages of the 2025 season. Despite the generous contracts, some players have been very underwhelming after getting the big payday. In particular, these players who signed major deals are now playing on new teams or in new roles: Christian Wilkins — four-years, $110M with Raiders, now a free agent Kirk Cousins — four-years, $180M with Falcons, now a backup Bryce Huff — three-years, $51.1M with Eagles, now with 49ers Jonah Jackson — three-years, $51M with Rams, now with Bears Gabe Davis — three-years, $39M with Jaguars, now a free agent Gardner Minshew — two-years, $25M with Raiders, now with Chiefs Chidobe Awuzie — three-years, $36M with Titans, now with Ravens While certain free agents such as Saquon Barkley and Danielle Hunter have delivered massive returns on their contracts to the Eagles and Texans, respectively, these other big signings have taken a completely different trajectory. Whether it is due to injuries, underperformance or not fitting the schemes, these players have not lived up to their deals. Wilkins is a case in point. The Raiders decided to cut him after signing him to a four-year, $110M deal. He struggled with injuries that held him out in 2024, leading to the team and Wilkins disagreeing on how the injury has been handled. Because of this, the two split ways only one year into his contract. Huff only played in 12 games and had a total of 2.5 sacks for Philadelphia after inking a three-year, $51.1M deal. He was traded to the 49ers in June for a 2026 mid-round pick. Cousins might be the most egregious of these deals. The former Vikings QB signed a four-year, $180M, with $100M fully guaranteed. Yet, he only started 14 games in 2024, and now is the backup to Michael Penix Jr. The Falcons now are essentially stuck paying their backup quarterback an annual average of $45M. These signings highlight the risk of free agency. Paying top dollar for past performance runs the risk of overlooking team fit and future value of contracts. Too often, these high-profile veterans who get massive paydays decline very fast or simply fail to mesh with new systems. So far, these investments in 2024 appear to have aged very poorly. Unless these players turn their performances around in 2025, many of the teams will view these moves as a cautionary tale of overspending in free agency.