Yardbarker
x
What the Leafs can learn from the Florida Panthers: Bill Zito’s cap management goes beyond tax benefits
Sam Navarro-Imagn Images

There’s an unfortunate maxim that permeates through modern sports coverage: in the absence of real analysis, there can be a tendency to gravitate towards the unquantifiable. Throughout the spring and well into the early stages of the summer, the Florida Panthers’ success was reduced to the sum of benefiting from no state income tax. Critics and complainants surmised that the Panthers won consecutive Stanley Cups largely by playing in Florida, building a roster with unfair advantages under a hard cap, rather than winning out due to their talent, chemistry, structure, defensive commitment, and chance production.

This idea was further pronounced when the Panthers pulled off the seemingly impossible, retaining Sam Bennett, Brad Marchand and Aaron Ekblad on long-term pacts, while signing Jeff Petry to a $775,000 deal where he functions as an overqualified No. 6 defenceman. It was a dream offseason for the defending champions, a revolting prospect for 31 other teams.

If you continue to discount Panthers general manager Bill Zito, and his staff consisting of Brett Peterson, Gregory Campbell and Sunny Mehta, among others, it simply makes their job easier. Florida is cooking with a nucleus of 10 players that are under contract through the 2029-30 season. It enters the 2025-26 season as the prohibitive favourite to three-peat. Mehta and Peterson should be leading candidates for general manager roles, especially if the NHL continues to operate as a copycat league.

“I think it’s more that they look at their group and they love playing together,” Zito recently said to NHL.com. “They truly are a team, they like being part of it, and that they’re excited because they think, ‘Listen, we’re in a position where we can do pretty well. We have the talent. We have the guys. We know each other. We know what works.'”

There’s often been a pithy cry in this corner of the internet: how are the Maple Leafs supposed to compete with the Panthers, if the Panthers have an inherent tax benefit? This would become a more lucid argument, if the Leafs handled contract negotiations with deft touch. Perhaps it’s unfair to attribute decisions made by Kyle Dubas to the current management group, but considering that the Leafs effectively mismanaged Mitch Marner’s expiring contract, which became clear when Marner revealed that he was always willing to push his contract talks to the proverbial 11th hour, they haven’t exactly secured the benefit of the doubt.

Brad Treliving signed William Nylander to an eight-year extension worth $11.5 million, which is fair value for the player, while Auston Matthews is under contract through the 2027-28 season at a $13.25 million cap hit, which again, is fair value. All of this becomes obscured when you compare these deals to the Panthers’ cap sheet, where Aleksander Barkov and Sergei Bobrovsky (playing out the final year of his deal) are the only players who make $10 million. You could argue this stems from Florida’s tax benefit, but there is a real winning culture as Zito stated, and they’ve managed to find a cure to the Disease of More that Bill Simmons once popularized.

Tax benefits perhaps embolden seismic risks, but you need someone to execute after all. Tax benefits didn’t make the Matthew Tkachuk trade, Zito did! Tax benefits didn’t identify Gustav Forsling as a diamond in the rough, nor did the tax benefits allow Forsling to grow into an all-world defenceman who can be stapled to Connor McDavid in the Final, and emerge victorious. I don’t recall Florida’s income tax laws making the trade for Sam Reinhart, either! I wrote about this idea extensively, after the Panthers pulled off successful trades for Seth Jones and Brad Marchand at the deadline as well: it takes bold leaders to pull these type of league-altering moves off! Zito, Mehta, Peterson and Campbell seemingly understand risk/reward better than any other front office over the past five years and have been rewarded handsomely for their bets on players that were overlooked or cast off.

What are the key lessons for the Leafs to take away from the Panthers? Although it may be significantly more difficult to avoid fan and media scrutiny, at some point you have to take major risks during your contention timeline, to secure pro-ready players. To be fair, the Maple Leafs have leveraged their draft capital for an all-in approach and 2023 perhaps constituted their optimal chance at a Cup run, but they need to constantly pursue high-performing veterans from rebuilding teams at the deadline. Treliving has done a much better job than Dubas in this regard thus far, the Marner saga notwithstanding, but it’s incumbent upon the Leafs to sign their players to long-term deals early in their tenure. Treliving nailed this when securing Matthew Knies to a six-year extension worth $7.75 million, a deal that should appreciate well under a rising cap. It’s now on Treliving and his pro scouting staff to continue to look for value across the league (the acquisition of Matias Maccelli may constitute this) draft well and build a nucleus that commits to winning rather than maximal contract and marketing value.

If you continue to solely attribute the Panthers’ success to no state income tax, that’s frankly a losing mentality. Florida is the gold standard across the NHL and it’s because of risk management, execution, scouting and a genuine commitment to winning that every team, Toronto included, can certainly learn from.

This article first appeared on TheLeafsnation and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!