Yardbarker
x
Notre Dame declining bowl game following CFP snub is valid
Notre Dame head coach Marcus Freeman. MICHAEL CLUBB/SOUTH BEND TRIBUNE / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Notre Dame declining bowl game following CFP snub is valid, justified 

The most controversial decision by the College Football Playoff selection committee was the inclusion of three-loss Alabama over two-loss Notre Dame. Notre Dame has decided that the playoff snub is going to end their 2025 season as they officially declined a bowl invitation on Saturday afternoon.

Notre Dame's frustration is understandable and valid

Some folks might look at Notre Dame's decision to back out of a bowl game as sour grapes or perhaps being a poor sport.

Maybe it is.

But it is also justified.

It is also very understandable from Notre Dame's perspective.

While Notre Dame did lose two games, losing its first two games of the season to playoff teams Texas A&M and Miami (by a combined XXXX points), the Fighting Irish went on a 10-game winning streak to end the regular season, winning several of those games in impressive, dominant fashion.

They also have what is arguably the best, most impact player in college football this season in running back Jeremiyah Love. They would have been a legitimate contender and a team that nobody would have wanted to play in a single elimination situation. 

Despite all of that, Notre Dame was left out in favor of Alabama and Miami. 

What makes that decision so baffling, and so indefensible from a Notre Dame perspective, is that Alabama was pushed over Notre Dame in the rankings a week ago when there was very little evidence to suggest that was the right call.

Notre Dame was also jumped by Miami in the final rankings on Sunday, even though Notre Dame and Miami did not play a game on Saturday.

How the rankings could flip in less than a week, when neither team played, exposes just one of the many flaws in the playoff selection process, and the flaws and inconsistencies that this particular committee had.  

The issue is not so much Miami getting an at-large spot over Notre Dame. Miami, after all, did beat Notre Dame in a head-to-head game earlier this season. The games being played on the field matter, and the head-to-head result should matter. 

But if that is the case, how does the committee justify consistently ranking Notre Dame ahead of Miami for weeks, only to flip them at the last possible second on a weekend where neither team played?

How does the committee argue that the eye test and how you are playing at the end of the season matter, and then watch Alabama struggle down the stretch, get blown out on Saturday and put it in ahead of Notre Dame?

How does the committee argue that teams will not be punished for losing badly in a conference championship game (Alabama), while punishing another team (BYU) for losing badly in a conference championship game, helping set the stage for Notre Dame to be left out?

It is a shameful process. 

Notre Dame not only lost out because of that, but it had to watch and listen to ESPN talking heads put down their resume all weekend to boost up Alabama. You can not blame Notre Dame for not wanting to give the network or college football in general a big audience for what will now be a meaningless game. 

Sour grapes? Maybe. Petty? You bet. Valid? Absolutely. 

Adam Gretz

Adam Gretz is a freelance writer based in Pittsburgh. He covers the NHL, NFL, MLB and NBA. Baseball is his favorite sport -- he is nearly halfway through his goal of seeing a game in every MLB ballpark. Catch him on Twitter @AGretz

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!