
Six weeks later, the Boston Celtics' decision to trade Jaylen Brown to the Philadelphia 76ers continues to sharply divide fan opinion across Beantown, with some seeing the vision of the front office but many simply overwhelmed by the loss of the franchise's most recent Finals MVP.
Among those who do miss Jayson Tatum's longtime partner in crime, a particular ire has been directed at Bill Chisholm, now entering his second year of ownership in the Celtics, for what they believe to be blatant cost-cutting and private equity greed in the decision to offload Brown.
Only time will tell how things shape up across the coming NBA season, but Chisholm and the entire organization with him are making it clear that they remain fully motivated by nothing but raising banners, and fully confident in their ability to do so.
Speaking on WEEI's "The Greg Hill Show" during the annual Jimmy Fund Radio-Telethon, Chisholm responded candidly to a question about his commitment to winning as owner of the Celtics.
Bill Chisholm reiterates to @TheGregHillShow that he is willing to do whatever it takes to win:
— Justin Turpin (@JustinmTurpin) August 18, 2026
"We're not playing for second. We're playing to win and to raise banners. Someone joked and was calling me in the beginning 'Billy Banners' because I said that, and I want to earn… pic.twitter.com/jXkYRpL9Kz
"I've said before and I'll say it again, we're not playing for second," Chisholm declared. "We're playing to win and to raise banners. You know, someone joked and was calling me at the beginning, 'Billy Banners,' because I said that – I want to earn that. I want to earn that, and I haven't yet.
"We have the ingredients to do it, and certainly the commitment," Chisholm continued. "We have the fans, and the organization has the commitment from me. We'll do whatever it takes. I'm desperate, desperate, to win. And it's the Boston Celtics, and so we should, and we will."
It's understandable that some fans would find the attitude of "whatever it takes" to be incongruent with the action of trading Brown for an aging Paul George, no matter what the analytics department says about his usage rate or on-off splits. Brown's declaration that the 2025-26 season, largely played without Tatum, was his "favorite year" in the NBA may have raised red flags, but plenty of Celtics fans remain adamant that the player underneath the personality was always worth holding onto regardless, and that the only reason to trade him must therefore have been a reluctance from Chisholm to pay him.
But the messaging from the Celtics front office has remained consistent that financial factors are not dominating the team's drive to win. President of Basketball Operations Brad Stevens, who served as Brown's first coach in the NBA, commented on the current second apron era in the latest "Celtics All-Access" video.
"When the league adopted the apron rules four, five years ago now, but they eased them in over time, we knew that our window was going to be that first couple years to be exceeding that," Stevens said. "Last summer, when we made the moves we made, we knew we would ultimately have to do that with the new apron rules, the thresholds, and really the challenges of trying to operate in that neighborhood."
"Those challenges are not the financial part," Stevens explained. "It's the limitation on trades, the future draft pick issues, et cetera."
At the end of the day, everybody is entitled to their own opinion regarding whether the Celtics got better or worse by handing the keys fully over to Tatum and shipping Brown off to a major rival. But the motivation for that move and all of the others being made in Boston under the current regime still has to be understood in terms of basketball, not the bottom line.
Titletown rarely finds a way to settle for second. Bill Chisholm has made clear that he won't be bucking that trend anytime soon.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!