
NFL officials publicly defended the medical care Jalen Hurts received in London on Tuesday, and reports that day said the league would not punish the Philadelphia Eagles over how the quarterback was cleared to play. That night, the NFL Players Association countered that the league had told the union it did not plan to review his care at all.
"The NFL and NFL Players Association are working together to review the matter," the league and the union said in a joint statement Sunday morning.
The review centers on the Eagles' Week 5 trip to face the Jacksonville Jaguars. An Oct. 10 ultrasound in London found a superficial clot in Hurts' calf, and the team said its staff and London-based doctors concluded he could safely play.
A follow-up ultrasound in Philadelphia showed the clot had moved. The diagnosis has since become deep vein thrombosis and bilateral pulmonary emboli, and Hurts is expected to miss the rest of the season.
"The notion that there's external factors that any of our physicians would put a player in harm's way, that's nonsense," NFL chief medical officer Allen Sills said at the owners' meetings.
"We welcome that," Commissioner Roger Goodell said Wednesday when asked about the union's call for an investigation.
The latest step: The NFL and NFLPA announced today that they are now working together to investigate the medical care #Eagles QB Jalen Hurts received. https://t.co/vOALx48ac4
— Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) October 25, 2026
Sunday's statement named no timeline. NFL Network's Mike Garafolo described the effort as still in its planning stage.
"The communication is underway regarding the investigation that the union called for into how this was handled with Hurts. It's taking some time, this is a big endeavor, obviously. But the sides have begun the communication to figure out the logistics of how this is going to happen," Garafolo said on NFL Network.
Under Article 39, Section 5(f) of the collective bargaining agreement, the NFLPA can open an investigation on its own without the league at the table. A review run jointly with the NFL suggests the union has not yet triggered that right, which leaves a league whose officials defended the Eagles' handling to help examine it.
More must-reads:
+
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!