Let’s be real here – while most of us are grinding away at our 9-to-5 jobs, some tennis players just casually stroll into Saudi Arabia for three days and walk away with more money than most people see in a lifetime. Welcome to the Six Kings Slam, where the prize money is so ridiculous it makes Grand Slam tournaments look like charity events.
The Six Kings Slam isn’t your typical tennis tournament – it’s an exhibition event that basically screams “we have too much money and we’re not afraid to show it.” Held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, this tournament brings together some of the biggest names in tennis for what’s essentially a very expensive game of tennis.
This year’s lineup reads like a who’s who of tennis royalty: Carlos Alcaraz (world No. 1), Jannik Sinner (the defending champion and current world No. 2), Alexander Zverev, Taylor Fritz, Novak Djokovic (because of course he’s there), and Stefanos Tsitsipas. Originally, Britain’s Jack Draper was supposed to join the party, but he decided to end his season early due to an arm injury – probably kicking himself now, considering the payday he missed.
Here’s where things get interesting (and by interesting, I mean completely absurd). The reported prize pool sits at a cool $4.5 million, but here’s the kicker – the winner could walk away with up to $6 million. To put that in perspective, Jannik Sinner won the US Open this year and took home $5 million. So essentially, this exhibition event in Saudi Arabia is paying more than one of tennis’s most prestigious tournaments. Make that make sense.
But wait, there’s more! Each player is guaranteed a participation fee of $1.5 million just for showing up. Let me repeat that – they get $1.5 million just for existing at this event. The winner gets an additional $4.5 million on top of that. Meanwhile, the rest of us are celebrating when we find a twenty-dollar bill in our old jeans.
The tournament format is refreshingly simple, probably because when you’re throwing around this much cash, you don’t want to overcomplicate things. It’s a knockout-style event with quarter-finals, semi-finals, and a final, all played in a best-of-three format.
Here’s where it gets a bit weird though – the seeding isn’t based on current ATP rankings like you’d expect. Djokovic gets the second seed despite being ranked fifth in the world, while Sinner (world No. 2) has to play in the quarters. Why? Because the organizers decided to base seedings on Grand Slam titles, giving Djokovic’s 24 majors the respect they deserve over Sinner’s four.
This year’s event will be streamed live on Netflix, which is a nice touch for those of us who want to watch millionaires play tennis from the comfort of our significantly less expensive homes. Last year it was on DAZN, so at least they’re making it more accessible.
Since this is an exhibition, there are no ATP ranking points up for grabs, and the results don’t count toward official head-to-head records. It’s basically expensive tennis theater, and honestly, we’re here for it.
Look, we can all pretend to be shocked that players are choosing money over tradition, but let’s be honest – wouldn’t you? Carlos Alcaraz has been particularly vocal about the packed tennis calendar, saying players are going to be “killed in some way” by the schedule. Yet here he is, adding more events to his calendar. The difference? These exhibitions pay better than most tournaments.
Alcaraz’s coach, Juan Carlos Ferrero, argues that exhibitions help his player relax since they’re more about entertainment than winning. That’s a nice way of saying “the pressure is off when you’re guaranteed seven figures just for participating.”
We can’t talk about this event without addressing the elephant in the room – it’s being held in Saudi Arabia as part of their “Riyadh Season.” Critics have raised concerns about “sportswashing,” where countries with questionable human rights records use sports investments to improve their image.
Norwegian player Casper Ruud turned down offers to play in the Kingdom last year, though he pointed out the hypocrisy of singling out Saudi Arabia when the tour regularly plays in China and other countries with their own human rights issues. It’s a fair point that makes everyone slightly uncomfortable.
At the end of the day, the Six Kings Slam represents everything that’s both brilliant and frustrating about modern professional sports. It’s brilliant because it’s giving tennis fans a chance to see the world’s best players compete in a relatively relaxed setting. It’s frustrating because it highlights just how much money is floating around in sports while regular tournaments struggle with prize money.
Jannik Sinner won last year’s event, beating Carlos Alcaraz in the final and probably sleeping very well on his pile of cash. This year’s event promises more of the same – elite tennis, ridiculous money, and enough drama to keep us all entertained.
Whether you love it or hate it, the Six Kings Slam is here to stay, at least as long as Saudi Arabia keeps writing checks that make Grand Slam prize money look like pocket change.
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!