West Ham on the market: should Manchester United risk £85 million to beat Chelsea?

In his debut season with the Hammers, Mohammed Kudus impressed, racking up 18 goals and 10 assists across all competitions. However, his second campaign told a different story. His influence waned, and his impact on games noticeably diminished. Even so, Kudus remains on the radar of several top clubs, a testament to the belief that he still has much to offer if he can recapture his best form.

But this leads to a pressing question: should Manchester United commit a significant sum to a player who showed signs of inconsistency in just his second year in English football? It’s a fair concern. Ruben Amorim, tasked with leading a new era at Old Trafford, needs players he can count on: individuals who bring not only talent but also consistency.

Kudus undoubtedly has flair, unpredictability, and rare versatility, capable of operating across the front line. However, his hefty price tag poses a dilemma. It could restrict United’s room for additional signings and inflate expectations for a player who, so far, has yet to establish himself as a long-term game-changer.

The second major question is whether Mohammed Kudus can truly be the spark to revitalise Manchester United’s attack. There’s no denying his potential, but staking £85 million on what is still largely a hunch may be an excessive gamble, especially at a time when the club needs balance more than spectacle. Ruben Amorim’s rebuild should be anchored in stability and collective cohesion, and while Kudus is an intriguing talent, he doesn’t offer the immediate reliability the team desperately needs.

In the choice between pursuing Kudus or exploring other wing options, United would be wise to proceed with caution. If Chelsea are eager to move, let them. United should only enter the race if there is flexibility, if the price drops significantly or if the player becomes clearly available under more favourable terms. At £85 million, this isn’t a market opportunity; it’s a high-stakes risk that may cost far more than it delivers.