Stan Wawrinka Isn’t Done Yet, Proves Age is Just a Number in Basel

Just when you think you’ve seen it all, the world of tennis throws you a curveball that feels both nostalgic and utterly surprising. Stan Wawrinka, a name that echoes through the halls of Grand Slam history, decided to remind everyone that he’s not just a legacy act. At 40 years old, an age when most of his peers are comfortably settled into commentary gigs or coaching roles, “Stan the Man” is still out there, grinding it out on the ATP Tour. And not just participating, but winning.

Let’s be real, seeing Wawrinka’s name on the Basel draw, thanks to a wildcard, probably elicited a few sentimental sighs. It’s his home tournament, a place where he debuted a staggering 22 years ago. It felt like a nice, respectable farewell tour stop. But Wawrinka clearly didn’t get that memo. Instead, he stepped onto the court against Miomir Kecmanovic and turned back the clock in spectacular fashion, securing a 6-1, 7-6 victory in a brisk hour and 22 minutes. It was a performance that screamed, “I’m still here, and I can still play.”

Wawrinka’s Masterclass in Basel

Watching the match, you could almost feel the collective “Wait, what?” from the tennis world. Wawrinka didn’t just edge out his younger Serbian opponent; he dominated. The first set was a blur, over in a mere 26 minutes. 

He was hitting his iconic one-handed backhand with the kind of ferocity that once dismantled Novak Djokovic in a French Open final. He landed 33 winners and kept his unforced errors to a respectable 25, a stat line that would make a player in their prime nod with approval.

The second set, however, was where the real drama unfolded. Kecmanovic, presumably after a stern talking-to from his coach (or himself), came out firing. He broke Wawrinka early and raced to a 4-1 lead. This was the moment everyone expected the 40-year-old body to falter. 

The point where the fairytale would hit the reality of modern, relentlessly physical tennis. But Stan Wawrinka isn’t just anyone. He showed the kind of grit that defines a champion, clawing his way back, breaking the Serb in the seventh game, and forcing a tie-break. He then proceeded to own that tie-break, showcasing his powerful serves and unflappable nerve to seal the deal. It wasn’t just a win; it was a statement.

Surpassing a Swiss Legend (In One Very Specific Way)

The victory wasn’t just emotionally significant; it also etched Wawrinka’s name into a new, albeit quirky, corner of the record books. With this win, he became the second-oldest player to secure a victory at an ATP 500 event. And who did he pass to claim that spot? None other than his countryman and a guy you might have heard of: Roger Federer. Yes, in his own backyard, Wawrinka managed to one-up the maestro himself in the longevity department. The only player now ahead of him is the seemingly immortal Feliciano Lopez. It’s a fun little stat, but it also underscores the sheer absurdity and brilliance of what Wawrinka is still accomplishing.

This victory was just his fourth on the ATP Tour this year, a tough statistic that highlights the struggles he’s faced with form and fitness. But it was a crucial one, keeping the Swiss hopes alive in their home tournament after the early exits of his compatriots.

What’s Next for Stan the Man?

So, what does this all mean? Is Stan Wawrinka about to make a miraculous late-career surge back to the top? Probably not, and that’s okay. What it does mean is that one of the most beloved and explosive players of his generation still has fire in his belly. He’s not content to fade away quietly. He’s out there to compete, to fight, and, on days like this, to win.

In the next round, he’ll face either the fourth seed, Caspar Ruud, or lucky loser Quentin Halys. It will be another tough test, but after this performance, who would dare write him off? For now, let’s just appreciate the moment. Stan Wawrinka is still here, hitting blistering backhands and reminding us all why we fell in love with his game in the first place. Age is just a number, but a win like this? That’s timeless.