Survivor Series once stood as one of WWE’s purest tests of roster depth and storytelling. The match type that gave us improbable comebacks and breakout stars began as a simple premise. Teams of five fought until only one person or team remained standing. The format created instant narratives and memorable moments.
Recent years have seen Survivor Series reshaped around WarGames instead of the traditional elimination match. Dominik Mysterio has publicly called for a return to the old formula, suggesting a full-blown SmackDown versus Raw versus NXT versus AAA brawl. His view is more than nostalgia. It points to a format that still offers something modern wrestling currently lacks.
Dominik’s pitch is simple. He wants the old Survivor Series match that puts brands and factions on one stage and forces creative teams to tell compact, meaningful stories over one match.
The Superstar recently told Rap On Wrestling that he would love to defend the Intercontinental Championship at Survivor Series while also participating in a traditional elimination match involving Raw, SmackDown, NXT, and even AAA. The quote underlines two things. First, it shows performers want chances to be seen in high-stakes multi-team scenarios. Second, it highlights the appetite for interpromotional chaos that television largely cannot provide.
The traditional match format rewards both veterans and young talent. It allows experienced hands to sell and carry, while room is given for emerging wrestlers to shine without bearing the whole show. Modern WarGames is intense and cinematic. Its theatrical nature limits quick bursts for underused talent. The classic Survivor Series match thrives on quick eliminations, surprise returns, and sudden momentum shifts. Those elements can create viral moments and renewed interest in a pay-per-view that some fans feel has become formulaic.
First, a return to eliminations improves storyline flexibility. Booking teams allows WWE to resolve or escalate multiple feuds in one match. Champions can be protected while losses still carry story weight.
A multi-brand match where NXT or AAA are invited adds fresh dream match potential without requiring long-term television investment. Audiences respond to unpredictability, and cross-promotion offers new, headline-friendly marketing angles. Recent announcements show WWE is leaning heavily into WarGames at major events. The company confirmed a WarGames focus for Survivor Series across multiple years, including 2024 and 2025. That reveals WWE likes the spectacle. Introducing a traditional elimination match either as the opening contest or as a marquee undercard would preserve spectacle while adding wrestling-centric storytelling.
Second, fan reaction matters. Some viewers have praised WarGames for its intensity. Other fans have complained that Survivor Series has become an evening of too few matches separated by long non-wrestling segments. The traditional elimination match presents a counterbalance. It can bulk up the card with high energy and lower the perception of too much downtime. That, in turn, can improve viewer satisfaction and create more social media conversation during the event.
Recent coverage of Survivor Series events reported mixed fan opinions about the current format and the amount of non-wrestling content. A revival of the classic match could reduce that criticism.
Modernizing the format requires two thoughtful adjustments. First, embrace brand crossovers without undercutting NXT. A three or four-way elimination match that starts with staggered entries or team captains gives each brand a moment. NXT should not be a token inclusion. It must be presented as legitimate.
Pairing NXT with a credible partner like AAA for occasional talent swaps can introduce fresh matchups and bring global interest. The idea Dominik floated about including AAA is not just a gimmick. It taps into a global wrestling ecosystem that modern WWE sometimes ignores.
Second, keep the match television-friendly. Long run times can be a problem. A fixed maximum time or a rule that forces pace will keep the match exciting. Another option is to run two traditional elimination matches, one for men and one for women. That ensures balanced representation and doubles the opportunity to create new stars.
If WWE wants to lean into WarGames as the visually dominant main event, a return to the classic Survivor Series elimination bouts earlier on the card would make the show feel fuller and more rooted in wrestling. That kind of programming balance benefits storytellers and consumers alike.
Reintroducing the classic match carries booking risks. A poorly structured multi-team match can produce muddled finishes and damaged credibility for talent who take illogical eliminations.
The elimination stipulation must not be used as a cheat mechanism to protect top stars at the expense of coherence. Fans notice cheap finishes. WWE must commit to clean, decisive endings when appropriate and use eliminations to further character arcs rather than simply hide booking problems.
WarGames remains a lucrative spectacle and will likely continue as a tentpole attraction for Survivor Series. Returning to traditional elimination matches does not require abandoning WarGames. The company can make both formats coexist by being intentional about card placement and narrative purpose.
A well-built traditional elimination match can act as a primer for a WarGames main event, providing heat and context rather than competing with it. Recent data suggests WWE is comfortable experimenting with formats and branding. Using that experimental mindset to revive Survivor Series traditions could be a win-win for the company and its fans.
Dominik Mysterio speaking publicly about wanting the classic Survivor Series match is more than a nostalgic plea. It is part of a larger roster-level desire for meaningful big-match opportunities and cross-promotion dream scenarios. WWE has repeatedly demonstrated it is willing to reimagine its big shows. The company can preserve WarGames as a headline spectacle while bringing back a format that rewards wrestling instincts and sparks breakout moments.
Doing so would honor Survivor Series history. It would also make the event feel like a celebration of roster depth rather than a single gimmick wrapped in cinematic presentation. Fans who hunger for competitive elimination drama will celebrate. Performers who crave the chance to tell compact stories in front of big crowds will thank WWE for remembering what made Survivor Series matter in the first place.
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!