x
Despite Old School Approach, Steelers are far From 'Unserious'
Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images

One of the biggest criticisms of the Pittsburgh Steelers over the years has been their old-school way of doing business. Whether in the draft, free agency, or contract extensions, the Steelers generally stick to a formula. It hasn't produced great results over the past decade, but some of those struggles can be attributed to abandoning the draft philosophies that previously brought them success. What is clear, however, is that the Steelers are committed to winning, even if others disagree with their approach.

Vic Tafur of The Athletic discussed the Steelers in his review of every NFL team's betting line. While he makes a few valid points, his overall assessment was difficult to ignore.

"It’s not the sexiest storyline, but the Steelers are shooting for their 20th straight non-losing season, but this time without Mike Tomlin. Aaron Rodgers, 42, decided he wanted to come back, and the Steelers aren’t a serious organization, so they said sure. There is enough defensive talent here, and I really like the addition of Michael Pittman Jr., so congratulations to Pittsburgh. Nine wins and they’re irrelevant once again."

Nothing wrong with the Steelers aiming to win

Unlike the Las Vegas Raiders, whom Tafur covered for years, the Steelers consistently put together winning seasons because that's what self-respecting organizations strive to do. The idea that tanking is the only path to contention is misleading. For every Detroit Lions turnaround under Dan Campbell that endured a brutal season, there are countless examples like the Raiders and Cleveland Browns, whose repeated failures never led to sustained success. No, the Steelers are not an "unserious" organization.

Do they need to recalibrate parts of their approach? Absolutely. There's a legitimate argument that they should have given Will Howard an opportunity to prove what he could do. Perhaps they also should have been more involved in the Malik Willis sweepstakes. However, the quarterback market offered few realistic options. Signing Aaron Rodgers is hardly enough to label an organization "unserious."

The Steelers are modernizing, even if it's gradual


© Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images

The idea of tanking simply for the sake of tanking is foolish. No self-respecting coach, player, or front office willingly embraces losing. More often than not, bad teams stay bad because dysfunction starts with ownership and filters throughout the organization. The franchises that consistently win and reach the postseason share stability, a clear organizational philosophy, and strong leadership. Those that don't, like the Browns and Raiders, constantly cycle through coaches, executives, and quarterbacks in search of those qualities. There are multiple ways to build a winning franchise, but intentional losing isn't one of them.

That said, the Steelers do need to continue evolving, and they already have begun making changes. Was the Mike McCarthy hire a home run? No. But it represented a shift in philosophy. The Steelers' previous three coordinator hires came from the young defensive ranks. This time, they chose a veteran, offense-oriented coach to lead the unit. They've also become far more aggressive in the trade and free-agent markets, areas where they were once notably conservative. Will those changes be enough? Probably not. They'll need to keep adapting. General manager Omar Khan appears committed to doing exactly that while preserving the franchise's identity as a team built through the draft and player development.

Are the Steelers perfect? No. Are they guaranteed to succeed in 2026? No. Are they "unserious" because they refuse to tank and instead try to win? Absolutely not.

This article first appeared on Athlon Sports and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!