Yardbarker
x
Do Packers Have Ability to Trade for Micah Parsons?
Dallas Cowboys linebacker Micah Parsons (11) celebrates after a sack during the third quarter against the New York Giants. Andrew Dieb-Imagn Images

Can the Green Bay Packers trade for Micah Parsons?

The short answer: The Packers absolutely could choose to pull off a blockbuster trade for the Dallas Cowboys’ All-Pro, who has reiterated his desire to play elsewhere. But, ultimately, it comes down to what they are willing to trade, and if they are willing to accept the tradeoffs, to make it happen.

Let’s dive in.

Parsons is on his fifth-year option salary of $24 million. The Packers could execute a trade and slide in his contract without causing an issue while under offseason salary-cap rules. Russ Ball would immediately tear up his existing contract, extend a new deal of at least $40 m illion per year, and the resulting 2025 cap number would be significantly less than the $24 million on his current contract.

The Packers’ typical veteran extension contract structure maximizes initial cash payments with lower salary caps in the first two years that tend to balloon in the later years. That said, a contract worth more than $40 million per season would put a significant dent into the 2025 and 2026 cap years.

Time for the tradeoffs.

First the Cowboys would need a treasure chest of draft picks to be willing to part with their four-time Pro Bowler and two-time first-team All-Pro player. Let’s just say two first-round picks (or player equivalents) plus maybe more. When I think of first-round picks, I equate them to eight years of premium talent under team control, so I view that the Packers would need to sacrifice 16 years of potential first-round, in-house talent for Parsons at age 26.

Next is factoring in who wouldn’t return in 2026 because Parsons is here. My early math has the Packers at $2 million over the cap already in 2026 – effectively break-even – and I’m not even accounting for any of their 11 scheduled unrestricted free agents plus more restricted and exclusive-rights players who are facing free agency.

Surely, the Packers would like some of these players to return. Even without Parsons, they’ll face tough choices of which free agents to bring back and which veteran players they may need to release to be cap-compliant in 2026. Layering in a Parsons mega-contract would only further complicate the calculus and decision-making process.

Not only would Parsons take away directly from the 2026 cap availability, but his 2025 contract would cut into the significant rollover the Packers need to even be at their current break-even status pre-Parsons.

Combining the draft picks needed and the existing 2026 salary-cap hurdles brings me to the third tradeoff: A trade for Parsons would be an “all-in” declaration for the Packers. As such, we would see a return to restructurings, void years and can-kicking to satisfy the salary cap. Running up the “cap credit card” is a short-term fix to fuel an all-in mindset but comes with long-term financial pain when the bill comes due, as we saw in Green Bay after the team traded Aaron Rodgers.

This article first appeared on Green Bay Packers on SI and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!