x
Canadiens Next Step: From Underdogs to Contenders
Carolina Hurricanes center Logan Stankoven scores a goal on Montreal Canadiens goaltender Jakub Dobes in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Final of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs (Eric Bolte-Imagn Images)

The Montreal Canadiens didn’t enter these playoffs as a finished product, and nothing about the way they played suggested they were supposed to be. Finishing sixth overall in the NHL, they handled the fifth and fourth overall seeds with a growing sense of conviction, giving themselves a real first look at what meaningful postseason hockey demands.

For a young core still forming its identity, that alone represented a significant step. But the playoffs have a way of drawing a hard line between emerging teams and established ones, and Montreal eventually ran into that reality against a second-ranked opponent in the Carolina Hurricanes, operating at a noticeably higher level. 

The challenge now shifts from proving they belong to figuring out how to close that final gap. This is the point in a rebuild where the lessons stop being abstract and become actionable, and the Canadiens will head into the draft and offseason with a clear mandate to find solutions that can elevate them from competitive to dangerous.

Whether that comes through adding a true top-six scorer, reinforcing key areas of depth, or leveraging their growing asset base for more immediate help, the objective is no longer simply about accumulation; it’s time for impact. The question that will define their offseason is how aggressively they are willing to be to ensure that next spring doesn’t end with the same familiar separation between “up-and-coming” and “contender.” 

Canadiens Transition to Contender 

What defined that Eastern Conference Final matchup wasn’t a lack of compete, but an ability to manage energy levels from series to series, and a gap in detail and execution that tends to separate teams learning how to win from teams that already know how. As the series tightened, puck management became more critical, defensive reads were punished more efficiently, and small mistakes quickly turned into momentum swings. That’s the unforgiving nature of the playoffs at that stage; nothing fundamentally changes about the game, but the margin for error disappears entirely, and experience becomes its own form of pressure. 

Zooming out, the Canadiens are hardly alone in this developmental space. Across the league, teams like the Buffalo Sabres and Anaheim Ducks are navigating similar transitions, trying to turn promising cores into reliable playoff entities. Even organizations now viewed as consistent postseason threats, like Carolina, went through their own growing pains for years before finding stability. That includes well-publicized early exits that exposed exactly how steep the learning curve can be when the stakes rise and the game compresses. 

For Montreal, the encouraging takeaway is that this run is still part of a larger arc rather than a finished chapter. A significant portion of their core has yet to reach its true prime, and even their more established players are still building out the kind of playoff repetition that eventually turns awareness into instinct.  

The coaching staff is evolving alongside that group as well. They’ve already shown they can win rounds and compete deeper into series, but now they’ve also seen clearly what still separates them from the league’s elite, and that clarity is often the first real step toward closing the gap. 

Canadiens Approach the Offseason 

The Canadiens enter this offseason in a noticeably different position than in recent years, and that shift changes the entire tone of their decision-making. After several seasons of accumulating assets and building one of the deeper prospect pipelines in the league, the organization finally finds itself with options rather than urgent holes to fill. With emerging talent across centre, defence, and in goal, the club is no longer drafting from a place of structural need, but from a place where refinement and elevation become the priority. 


Carolina Hurricanes center Logan Stankoven scores a goal on Montreal Canadiens goaltender Jakub Dobes in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Final of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs (Eric Bolte-Imagn Images)

That distinction brings the focus into sharper relief: this is less about filling gaps and more about pushing the roster toward true contention. The most pressing need remains top-six scoring talent, players who can consistently drive offence and complement an already developing young core. A dynamic forward capable of creating offence independently would meaningfully raise the ceiling of the group. On the back end, right-shot defensive depth still stands out as a secondary but important area, given how valuable and difficult those players are to acquire once teams transition from rebuilding to competing. 

Canadiens Targets

With the Canadiens holding the 28th overall selection, the expectations are that Quebec Maritimes Junior Hockey League (QMJHL) centres Yegor Shilov or Maddox Dagenais could be selected at that stage of the draft. However, the chances of the player they select being NHL-ready within the next three years, or if that player can crack an NHL lineup ready to compete for the Stanley Cup at that time, are very low. 

The Canadiens are the second-youngest team in the league, with a strong prospect pool and a well-managed salary cap. They haven’t sacrificed their rebuild timeline to reach this point in their progression. They have plenty of cap flexibility to keep adding pieces via trade or free agency, as well as built-in internal upside with quality prospects. Add in a growing stockpile of draft capital, and they are now in a position to start converting futures into present-day help.  

This is the stage of a rebuild where assets become leverage, and Montreal can realistically target upgrades like a top-six scorer or a right-shot defenceman through the trade market. It is likely going to require multiple assets to find one player that can fill their needs now. And the biggest and most obvious need is a second-line centre. 

The unrestricted free agent (UFA) market this summer is weak, but there are several options on the trade market that general manager (GM) Kent Hughes could be interested in. Starting with the New York Rangers’ Vincent Trocheck. The Rangers looked hard into trading him during the season, but no one met their price. They will try again this summer. But, Canadiens president Jeff Gorton’s history with Rangers ownership, and Trocheck’s age (35 years), along with a cap hit of $5.25 million, even despite his 53 points, is not a true fit for the price Montreal would need to pay. 

The Ducks’ Mason McTavish could be vulnerable to being moved, and according to Pierre LeBrun, the Ducks are listening to offers. With new contracts coming to pending restricted free agents Leo Carlsson and Cutter Gauthier this summer. He just signed a six-year extension at $7 million last September, then missed training camp and saw a dip in points and faceoff effectiveness, but at only 23 years of age, he would fit with the core group’s age moving forward.


Mason McTavish, Anaheim Ducks (Jess Starr/The Hockey Writers)

Perhaps the best fit is Nico Hischier . He and the New Jersey Devils  have begun contract talks to extend his current $7.25 million per season deal that expires after the 2026-27 season, and he will most likely be looking for a significant raise. LeBrun reports that while he is not on the market yet, there is a good chance he will be if no extension is signed this summer. There is little doubt that a bidding war would ensue for his services, but any team he is willing to sign with would likely be in the lead, and with the Canadiens becoming a destination due to their expected future, they could be if they’re willing to pay the very high cost financially and in trade assets. 

The 27-year-old Hischier fits in age with the current core group. He is also the second-line version of Nick Suzuki. He is a strong defensive centre who can put up points (60-70 points per season) and win faceoffs (average of 55% over the last three seasons). Had Montreal been able to roll out that one-two punch at centre this spring, there likely could have been a more favourable outcome. 

At a broader level, the real storyline is no longer just about what the Canadiens are building, but when they choose to accelerate it. With the prospect base and future assets they’ve accumulated, Montreal now has the flexibility to explore whether parts of that pipeline should be converted into immediate NHL help. That’s the inflection point many rebuilds struggle to navigate: moving from patience to aggression without undermining what’s already been developed. 

Ultimately, this offseason serves as a measuring stick for how the organization views its own timeline. Rebuilds are defined by accumulation, but contenders are defined by timing and calculated risk. The Canadiens have met the intersection of those two phases, where adding impact scoring and reinforcing key structural positions isn’t just about future growth; it’s about signaling that they have transitioned to the next stage.

This article first appeared on The Hockey Writers and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!