Found November 12, 2013 on Awful Announcing:
In the wake of the story of him allegedly bullying teammate Jonathan Martin and threatening his life, Miami Dolphins' guard Richie Incognito became one of the most sought-after interviews in sports. Fox's Jay Glazer was the guy who got him, landing an exclusive interview with Incognito this week that aired on the network's NFL pregame show Sunday (and later on Fox Sports Live); a transcript of the portions of the interview that aired can be found here. However, that interview proved controversial, given that Glazer has trained Incognito in MMA in the past and has been friendly with him. As seen in this Sports Business Daily piece, some journalists praised Glazer for the exclusive and for asking some hard questions, while others thought he was too soft and still others found this relationship to be a sad commentary on the state of sports journalism. How does Glazer's interview fit into the media landscape, and what does it tell us about journalism today? There are several points in favour of what Glazer and Fox did here. First off, it's worth pointing out that Glazer wasn't completely compromised. Glazer's relationship with Incognito was not a financial one (he's stated that he didn't receive payment for training Incognito), and just about everyone covering a sport (particularly "insiders" like Glazer) works to become close to sources. Moreover, Glazer has stated (including on The Dan Patrick Show) that there were no preconditions to this interview. He was allowed to ask anything, and did; Incognito elected not to respond to some questions (including those on what coaches told him to do with Martin), and that's his right, but that's not on Glazer. Fox and Glazer also handled disclosure well, with Glazer informing viewers at the start of the piece that he had a relationship with Incognito.  There's no dispute that Glazer isn't purely a neutral, objective journalist here, but that's no reason to say he can't do this interview and Fox can't air that. Viewers were informed of the relationship and then were allowed to judge for themselves if the interview was tough enough; that's a fair way to handle this. Moreover, as Ed Sherman points out, these kinds of relationships are widespread, and they're sometimes necessary to getting an interview. Could someone else have questioned Incognito more intensely? Sure; as Richard Deitsch writes, this "wasn't Oriana Fallaci grilling Henry Kissinger in 1972 on the Vietnam War." It's worth noting that Glazer likely got this interview because of his relationship with Incognito, though, and Glazer has said that Incognito's PR team was leery of doing it even with that, favouring keeping silent. Incognito's not going to talk to a lot of the people who have blasted Glazer here, including Dave Zirin or Tom Ley. They make some valid points about the problems with these kinds of pieces, but there's still journalistic value in having Incognito's comments out there; he wasn't going to give them to a hostile or even a neutral-but-unknown reporter. Glazer got the scoop, prefaced it with an appropriate disclaimer and put it out there for people to judge. Yes, it's less than ideal that a reporter covering a sport is involved with his subjects outside of that. If that leads to something of value in the end, though, that's not necessarily bad. It's interesting that some of the harshest criticism here came from Deadspin's Ley, who called the interview "a f***ing joke"; there are some parallels here to Gawker Media's oft-discussed approach of paying for particular stories, which carries some ethical problems, but can be valuable if it provides something useful that wouldn't otherwise emerge. On a less-controversial level are anonymous sources: they're less than ideal, certainly, and can lead to disasters, but a lot of important pieces wouldn't be published without them, so just about every outlet will use them under certain circumstances. As with Glazer-Incognito, not all important stories can be obtained solely with perfect, on-the-record interviews with dogged investigative reporters. Sometimes, the lines get murkier.  However, there are still questions here for Fox and Glazer. For one thing, many of the critiques of Glazer have focused on the lack of an aired question about  Incognito being accused of molesting a young female volunteer with a golf club. Glazer told Bob Raissman of The New York Daily News he asked about that, but it was cut from the final interview that aired (Glazer interviewed Incognito for 45 minutes, but the eventual segment only ran six minutes.) That's fair enough on his part, but not including that is a suspect editing decision from Fox. (And if it wasn't good enough to air in such a short segment, why not release it and other footage from the interview online to make your reporter look better?) Moreover, while Fox got the exclusive, they may have lost some authority on the subject from how they handled it. Airing Incognito's side of the story is valuable, but the circumstances under which it was obtained weren't ideal journalistically, and it may get some viewers to wonder about Glazer's credibility when he has relationships with athletes he covers. Those relationships shouldn't disqualify Glazer from covering the NFL, but they should be disclosed (as they were here) so viewers can decide for themselves if the information he provides is objective enough or not.  Really, in some ways, this comes down to the perils of access, and that goes beyond Fox. As we saw when ESPN dropped out of their concussion documentary joint project with PBS, it's awfully difficult for NFL rightsholders to be too critical of the league. Similarly, Deadspin scooped ESPN on Manti Te'o (and ESPN made themselves look terrible afterwards by getting a Te'o "exclusive" that involved Jeremy Schaap just relaying what Te'o told him off camera) partly thanks to their lack of access; without a relationship with Te'o (or his team, or the sport he plays), they didn't feel they needed to get his side on the record before publishing. Relationships can make critical coverage dicey. However, that doesn't mean that all relationships should be nixed, as on-camera access still matters, and it doesn't mean that all no-access coverage is superior; sometimes it turns into criticism for the sake of criticism. In the end, consumers are well-served; they can see Glazer's interview with Incognito thanks to his access, and they can read the criticism of it before deciding for themselves how to view it. Relationships like the Glazer-Incognito one certainly don't make for perfect journalism from an ethics standpoint, but they can advance the amount of information out there. Whether that information's fair or important is best left to the media consumer to decide. 

Richie Incognito: 'I am not a racist'

For the past week, Miami Dolphins guard Richie Incognito has been at the epicenter of a firestorm that involves racial implications, and hazing and bullying allegations from his own teammate, Jonathan Martin, who left the team on Oct. 28. Martin's attorney, David Cornwell, released a statement Thursday that alleges that Martin endured harassment that went far beyond the traditional...

Report: Playoff Contender Interested In Signing Richie Incognito if He’s Cut

The Dolphins need to make a decision on Richie Incognito, and they have less than three weeks to decide his future. According to Pro Football Talk, a few playoff contenders will also be monitoring the status of Incognito’s future with the Dolphins as well. Per a league source with knowledge of the situation, Incognito’s suspension for conduct detrimental to the Dolphins is indefinite...

Dolphins lose another lineman, they are getting super thin on the O-Line

With the entire Richie Incognito/Jonathan Martin scenario the only person really suffering (besides the fans), is Ryan Tannehill.  The 2nd year quarterback has all the talent in the world, but has the worst offensive line situation in the NFL.  Well Ryan it is not looking any better.  Will Yeatman the swing tackle who played Monday […]

Dolphins fans show up with “Free Incognito” signs for Monday Night Football

Monday Night Football featured two Florida teams who are struggling this season. The Tampa Bay Bucs faced off against the Miami Dolphins. The Dolphins of course, have been dealing with the fall out over accusations from estranged offensive lineman Jonathan Martin that he was harassed and bullied during his season and a half with the team. For those who thought fans would turn their...

Report: Jeff Ireland, Joe Philbin not expected to survive Incognito-Martin saga

According to Mike Silver of the NFL Network, Dolphins general manager Jeff Ireland and head coach Joe Philbin aren’t expected to survive the Jonathan Martin-Richie Incognito saga. Need NFL Tickets? Loading... ZergNet The post Report: Jeff Ireland, Joe Philbin not expected to survive Incognito...

Glazer did ask Incognito anything and everything

FOX Sports released the rest of Jay Glazer’s one on one interview with Richie Incognito during Monday’s FOX Football Daily Show. As you can see from the video above, Glazer did in fact ask Incognito anything and everything. Many people ripped Glazer on Sunday and Monday for not asking about the trip to Vegas that Jonathan Martin was allegedly fined $15,000 for not attending....

NFL Ratings, Week 10: Late, Sunday Night windows down

Pregame Fox, which usually wins the ratings battle at Noon ET anyway, had the much-anticipated Richie Incognito interview in the second half of their show. Fox NFL Sunday drew a 3.6 overnight, which topped (but didn't hurt) CBS' The NFL Today, which drew a fairly typical 2.6. Fox's rating was the best for their pregame show since Week 5. According to the network,...

Desmond Howard: "What level of coonery is going on inside Miami Dolphins locker room?"

Desmond Howard is curious "What level of coonery is going on inside Miami Dolphins locker room?" in that Richie Incognito could be an 'honorary black man.' [Awful Announcing]Urban Dictionary says 'coonery' is a 'Pejorative term to describe behavior that is seen as unbecoming of African-Americans.' **Follow us on Twitter, Subscribe by Email, View...

Martin to make his voice heard soon

Richie Incognito told his side of the story with FOX Sports' Jay Glazer, and now it's time for Jonathan Martin to tell his.

Martin sent Incognito a 'murder' meme

In his interview with Jay Glazer on "FOX NFL Sunday," Miami Dolphins guard Richie Incognito responded to claims that he had bullied teammate Jonathan Martin by offering up a new claim of his own that Martin himself had sent threatening messages during their communications over the past few months. The eighth-year vet then highlighted one text message in particular, stating...

Miami Dolphins vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Odds, Point Spread, Over/Under and tv info

The Miami Dolphins will stay in state this week as they face off against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Miami (4-4) has been distracted this week with details of alleged behavior from offensive lineman Richie Incognito against Jonathan Martin. Things have not been much better in Tampa Bay (0-8) as they have dealt with MRSA and locker room control issues all season long. Coverage of the...

Richie Incognito Says Jonathan Martin Threatened to Murder His Family

In the first part of Incognito’s interview with FOX’s Jay Glazer he dropped this bombshell. “A week before this went down, Jonathan Martin texted me, ‘I will murder your whole F—ing family. Now did I think Jonathan Martin was going to murder my family? Not one bit,” Incognito said. If this was truly the way Incognito and Martin text each other, then maybe we know why...

Mike Tirico calls Dolphins penalty on Richie Incognito

Mike Tirico is one of the best in the business.  And with another in a long line of terrible Monday Night Football games and the never-ending news cycle surrounding Jonathan Martin and Richie Incognito, this may be the most predictable Freudian slip in the history of broadcasting.  Early in the first quarter, a Dolphins offensive lineman was called for a personal foul and Tirico...

Mike Tirico Assumes Unsportsmanlike Penalty Is On Richie Incognito

Miami Dolphins center Mike Pouncey was flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct in the first quarter of Monday Night’s Dolphins-Buccaneers game in Tampa, but ESPN’s Mike Tirico just assumed the flag was for Richie Incognito because he’s apparently the team bully in Miami. Incognito, as you probably know, is suspended indefinitely amidst the Jonathan Martin hazing saga. We’ll just...

It’s time to stop judging black athletes

Many people would agree that Miami Dolphins offensive lineman Jonathan Martin is a victim of racism. It has been reported that the text messages and voice mails he received from fellow offensive lineman Richie Incognito were threatening and had racial overtones. But, if there hadn’t been any racial aspects to the messages and voice mails, would the threats and violent attitudes...
Dolphins News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.