Originally written on The Nats Blog  |  Last updated 6/4/12

The 2012 MLB Amateur Draft begins today, and it’s a day that many baseball fans look forward to more than the actual season. It’s a chance to see your team’s future in a snapshot, and it gives even the worst teams hope for the future. This year, though, the draft is going to look very different.

The Washington Nationals spent the last five years picking in the top ten in the draft, and this year they aren’t even in the top half in the first round at 16th overall. In 2009 and 2010, the Nats were able to pick first overall because of atrocious records the season before, and they were able to land generational talent in Stephen Strasburg and Bryce Harper. Both guys are now on the Nationals 25-man roster, and both are making a huge impact.

If the Nationals had a chance to pick either of those players this year, or even Anthony Rendon in 2011, it might have been a struggle based on the new Collective Bargaining Agreement. The new agreement essentially tells teams what they can spend on the draft, or teams can be stuck with extremely high financial penalties: a 75% tax for exceeding number by more than 5%. If you exceed the cap by 15%, you could lose two future first-round picks and be taxed 100%. If teams do that, and the player they drafted the first round of the penalty year doesn’t pan out, it could put a team in the hole for a decade.

This year, there is no “Strasburg” or “Harper.” There’s not even a “Rendon.” Even still, the Nats will be able to spend $4.4 million on their first ten picks. In contrast, they spent $16.5 million on their first five picks in 2011, a draft where they landed significant talent to help their future like Rendon, Matt Purke, and Alex Meyer. If the Nats were restricted to the slot in the past three years, it’s possible the Nationals aren’t competing for the division right now, and it’s likely they couldn’t compete for as long as many expect them to. Under the new agreement, players can’t be signed to major league deals right out of the draft, which compounds the issue.

Now, there’s a point to this: parity. The goal is to give teams like the 2008, 2009, and 2010 Nationals a chance to compete against big money franchises like the Phillies and Yankees. However, it is hindering teams willing to spend money on prospects in the draft rather than helping the teams that only want to pay slot for drafted players. The Lerner family should be lauded for their willingness to spend a lot of money to make the Nats better for their fans; they shouldn’t be penalized for being good owners.

I’m not saying something shouldn’t be done to help bad teams. Without strong drafts, a smart GM in Mike Rizzo, and willing owners, the Nationals wouldn’t be where they are today. Some teams don’t have all of those benefits and need additional help. However, teams that are willing to spend money to build a team from the bottom up rather than going into the free agent market shouldn’t have to risk their future just for one pick, and that’s what the new CBA does.

So as I watch this year’s draft, I’ll be interested in who the Nats pick and how he can help the team in the coming years. But I’ll be equally interested to see who decides to go to college instead of becoming a professional ballplayer because of these new rules.

Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Report: Wilson, Seahawks agree to four-year, $86.7M contract

Report: Former Jets exec leaked false Deflategate info to ESPN

Belichick on sticking it to NFL: 'Really not very important to me'

Yankees, Astros reportedly both pursuing Craig Kimbrel

Urban Meyer hints JT Barrett leads Ohio State starting QB competition


Boras: Marlins players are angry Marcell Ozuna is in minors

Report: Chancellor officially holding out of training camp

Cardinals' Jen Welter is 'tired of hearing about Tom Brady's balls'

Sandoval downplays talk about weight, conditioning, defense

Astros acquire Carlos Gomez from Brewers

Richardson charged for resisting arrest after high-speed chase

The Rock 'pretty disappointed,' but defends Hulk Hogan

Urban Meyer will make us wait on OSU's starting QB decision

Compelling camp competitions: #5 Bradford vs. Sanchez

Five most overrated NFL players heading into 2015 season

Giants acquire Mike Leake from Reds for two prospects

Twins closer's wife pens essay about Twitter hate he's enduring

Kings set to make Lieberman NBA’s second female coach

Is Julius Randle a star?

Projecting the prospects in the David Price trade

'Miracle on Ice' goalie selling Olympic gear for $5.7 million

Josh Smith addresses ‘harder on me’ comment in essay

Examining the state of the NFL

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Examining the state of the NFL

Puig: Broke out of slump by playing baseball video games

Braves dump risk, exchange it for risk

David Price traded to Blue Jays

The indefensible Hulk Hogan

Cole Hamels chose Rangers over Astros

Can Preller fix the mess in San Diego?

Next summer's top 10 NBA free agents

Who is the NL's new top shortstop?

Cardinals HC Bruce Arians calls Jen Welter a 'trailblazer'

Mets still act like a small-market team

Tom Brady: I did nothing wrong

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Follow Yardbarker