Originally posted on Camden Crazies  |  Last updated 12/20/11


Small change, but the O's have agreed to minor-league contracts with:

Right-handed pitcher Kyler* Newby; the soon-to-be 27 year-old sometimes starter (he's been shifted into that role a little bit in recent years) has spent most of his minor-league career in Double-A, where he's punched out some batters (8.3 K/9) but shown only decent control (3.0 BB/9) and a tendency to give up the longball (1.2 HR/9), as sometimes happens with flyball pitchers. Might be an OK reliever (don't have starting-relieving splits - maybe his non-knock-out seeming stuff plays up especially well out of the pen?).

* Was 'Kyle' just too boring of a name? Did it have to be made more "extreme"?

Right-handed pitcher Jon Link; he'll be 28 at the start of next season, and is almost exclusively a reliever. Career Triple-A numbers; 9 K/9, 3.9 BB/9, 0.8 HR/9. Seems to primarily use a low-90s fastball and a slider, though the fastball might have some sink to it since Link's been able to generate some groundballs (less so recently than in the lower minors, but still around a 50% rate). Based on five-minutes of looking, I like him better than Newby (though he's still probably only a 4.50 ERA type guy in the majors at best).

Outfielder Antoan Richardson; he's 28 years old, but still only has 40 career plate appearances above Double-A, where he's hit .260/.384/.321. He's supposed to be a very good defensive player, as a speedy center-fielder. Plus he's stolen bases at an almost 85% clip with almost 60 thefts per full season in his minor-league career (though only ~20 steals per at around 80% in Double-A). I love the walks (13.5% career walk rate at Double-A), but Richardson strikes out too much (~18% of the time) to hit for a high average even with a good BABIP (around .330), and he has virtually no power. It wouldn't be surprising to see the free passes decrease at higher levels as pitchers have little reason not to challenge Richardson, but if he could keep his OBP in even the .320-.330 range while saving 10+ runs per season in the field then he would be a decent back-up outfielder.

Outfielder/first-baseman Lee Cruz; this 28 year-old only even has 140 games in Double-A to his name. Given the side of the defensive spectrum that he plays on, it's not surprising to see that Cruz's game is about the power production; he's hit .255/.297/.433 in Double-A and .292/.330/.485 in the minors overall. He doesn't hit a ton of homers (~20 per season), but cracks a bunch of doubles to make up for it. He'll put the bat on the ball more than some other sluggers, but never walks (less than 5% of the time in the minors) and - unless his fielding is much more impressive than I'd assume (in the outfield he tended to play left) - he's unlikely to even be particularly close to a replacement level player in the majors. But hey, minor league depth!

I wonder if Stephen Walters* had a hand in bringing these guys aboard.

* Econ professor at Loyola who the O's just brought aboard (though he apparently advised Angelos in the past and also worked with Dan Duquette in Boston).

He's already "provided financial valuations — based on an undisclosed formula — which have aided the Orioles in their pursuit of several minor league free agents they have signed this offseason" and he "analyzes how many additional wins a player can create and how much a specific team should pay for those wins...

"If you incorporate 'Player X' into the mix, how many wins does that add and how much are those wins worth in that market?" said Walters, who also still works for Loyola. "It can vary from case to case, and there is a time dimension question with any player transaction — what are the future ramifications? … So the puzzle pieces come together, and ultimately, Dan is the guy who masterminds that information. But a lot of people supply him with the information.""

I'm not sure how much more complicated Walters' "formula" is than the freely available WAR implementations around the web (I'd assume he's using proprietary inputs, but is his formula different than the normal frameworks?). Plus, sometimes* economists will apply their models to baseball and get odd results instead of building models starting from the baseball. (Obviously not all economists are the same - Matt Swartz, for example, does some very fine work). I read Walters' study on the free agent market and came away not completely impressed (I guess in 2007 it might have been more ground-breaking, maybe). At least he didn't try to come up with his own measure of player production and used WARP instead, but that still leaves me wondering what Walters brings to the table relative to what the sabermetricians already have going.

* For example, one of the previous studies that Walters/Burger criticize was one that used slugging percentage as a proxy for overall player production, which is laughably wrong. 

 

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Report: Seahawks players feel Sherman bombshell story ‘nailed it’

Turkey: Kanter a member of terrorist group, issues warrant

Chad Johnson says Roger Goodell consulted him on touchdown celebration rule change

Kevin Durant is not to blame for the NBA’s lack of parity, and he knows it

Khloe Kardashian called out Cavs fan who mentioned ‘curse’

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Warriors’ Mike Brown: Steve Kerr may be back for the Finals

Dodgers transfer Andrew Toles and Scott Kazmir to the 60-day disabled list

Looking back at 40 years of women racing in the Indianapolis 500

U.S. national soccer teams to wear LGBT-themed jerseys to celebrate pride month

Mike Zimmer: Teddy Bridgewater still has ‘long ways to go’

Report: Clippers concerned about Chris Paul leaving to sign with Spurs

Best of Yardbarker: Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines

The 'More like Whiffer, Texas Ranger...amirite?' quiz

The Rewind: Vince Carter's graduation day celebration that wasn't

Manu Ginobili gave life to the San Antonio Spurs

Stanley Cup Final: A David vs. Goliath matchup that's not as lopsided as it may appear

Why the Indianapolis 500 is called 'the greatest spectacle in racing'

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Box Score 5/26: Bring on the Finals

Why wait? Our too soon Cavaliers-Warriors NBA Finals preview

Kicking It: East is East, and West is West

Three Up, Three Down: Some surprises way out (NL) West

The 'Let's go to the videotape!' quiz

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Best of Yardbarker: Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines

The 'More like Whiffer, Texas Ranger...amirite?' quiz

Stanley Cup Final: A David vs. Goliath matchup that's not as lopsided as it may appear

Manu Ginobili gave life to the San Antonio Spurs

The Rewind: Vince Carter's graduation day celebration that wasn't

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Kicking It: East is East, and West is West

Three Up, Three Down: Some surprises way out (NL) West

The 'Let's go to the videotape!' quiz

Why the Indianapolis 500 is called 'the greatest spectacle in racing'

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker