Originally written on Fangraphs  |  Last updated 8/22/12

For most of 2012, the Baltimore Orioles have been playing over their heads. Well, at least when it comes to their expected win-loss record.

Based on the run differential the team has generated, the O’s have amassed 10 more wins than we would expect based on their Pythagorean winning percentage. The team has outplayed its cumulative expected winning percentage throughout the year and — since April — picked up two additional wins at the end of each month. If they sustain this performance and finish August with at least 10 more wins then their Pythagorean winning percentage would predict, they would be just the third team to do so since 2001 (the 2004 Yankees and the 2007 Diamondbacks are the other two).

Some might point to this glaring discrepancy between Baltimore’s actual winning percentage and Pythagorean winning percentage as evidence that the Orioles cannot sustain their winning ways. Of course, this raises the question of whether we really gain anything from a predictive standpoint heading into September if we focus on a team’s expected winning percentage rather than their actual performance.

The answer based on a review of the past decade seems to be no.

Using Baseball-Reference’s historical standings tool, I looked at cumulative team winning percentage at the end of May, June, July and August — between 2001 and 2011 — and how well their winning percentage and Pythagorean winning percentage* correlated with the actual rest-of-season winning percentage (n=330 individual seasons). Basically: How well did a team’s winning percentage through the end of July correlate with the team’s winning percentage from Aug. 1, through the end of the season?

Here are the results:

At the end of May, both the actual winning percentages and the Pythagorean winning percentages are predictive of ROS winning percentage. After that, actual winning percentage provides a slight advantage in each month, except August. That’s where winning percentage has about a 3% advantage in terms of explanatory power. But in July, both the actual and the Pythagorean winning percentages explain more than 27% of the variance in ROS winning percentage. It would appear that once a team manages to navigate August, focusing on a team’s expected winning percentage — with an eye toward predicting September — is less helpful than simply looking at real performance.**

But what about significantly overachieving teams, like this year’s Orioles? Surely, a team that’s five or more wins above their expected winning percentage is expected to fade down the stretch, right?

Turns out, not so much.

First, let’s simply isolate the data to teams that outperformed their Pythagorean expectation by five or more wins through the end of each month:

As you see, the results are similar to what we found with the full sample: Actual winning percentage is just as good, or better, at predicting ROS winning percentage in each month. And it gives about 4% better explanatory power at the end of August.

For underperforming teams, though, the story is much different:

The predictive power of both types of winning percentage increase each month, but in this case, Pythagorean winning percentage has a higher correlation to ROS winning percentage in each month.

So why the difference? Here’s one theory: It’s somewhat of a self-fulfilling prophecy. For example, teams that are over performing are more likely to see themselves as contenders and make moves to reinforce that status. By the time you get to August, they may have counteracted any kind of natural regression by altering the team. Conversely, underachieving teams might do the opposite, thereby securing a disappointing season.

There probably are a bunch of other theories for this finding (i.e. superior performance in one-run games based on bullpen strength, which isn’t captured by the calculation for expected winning percentage, etc.), but the bottom line is that simply relying on expected winning percentage to discount a team’s chances for sustaining their performance through September isn’t a great idea. Especially since their actual winning percentage generally predicts their September record better. The better way to approach it would be to look at whether the composition of the team has changed (for better or worse) and whether there are trends their more recent performance that foretell a change in either direction (e.g. injuries, pitcher fatigue).

—————

*I also used Baseball-Reference’s Pythagorean Winning Percentage: For details on the equation used, see here.

**These findings differ from Clay Davenport’s, who looked at the difference between actual and Pythagorean winning percentages through various games played increments. Why that’s the case, I’m not sure. But his overall results that Pythagorean becomes less useful relative to actual winning percentage as the end of the season draws closer is consistent with the findings here.


GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Dolphins sign Josh Freeman just four days after cutting him

Teammate: Victor Cruz looks faster now than ever before

Donald Trump rips Boston mayor over failed Olympic bid

Power struggles becoming the norm for successful franchises

Report: Tom Brady destroyed phone, suspension to be upheld

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

J.J. Watt calls training camp 'the greatest'

Hibbert asked agent to find him a coach who played in NBA

Irsay, Goodell haven't spoken about Deflategate since January

Arizona Cardinals make Jen Welter first female NFL coach

Larry Bird: Michael Jordan would kill me in 1-on-1 now

Junior Seau family says Hall of Fame went back on its word

Six players poised for big year after season-ending injuries

‘Mystery pooper’ torments golf course by defecating in holes

Gyllenhaal’s parents made him turn down ‘Mighty Ducks’ role

Eli, Romo channel Rob Lowe in new DirecTV commercials

Troy Tulowitzki, the Blue Jays, and upgrading strengths

Nick Saban has incredible advice for his players on chasing girls

Nik Stauskas trolls Thad Matta

Will Smith fires back at former teammate Junior Galette

Sammy Watkins: It's a "problem" if Bills don't win AFC East

The most important quarterback in the game?

Boston Mayor Walsh refusing to sign Olympic host contract

Chris Johnson accused of smashing up Rolls-Royce rental

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Cardinals hire first female NFL coach

Larry Bird: Michael Jordan would kill me in 1-on-1 now

Seau family: HOF broke their word

Kobe to see time at power forward next year

Mike Pettine not ruling out Manziel

Galette appears to unload on Payton

Dez Bryant in 'financial distress' before signing new deal

Top 10 CFB coaches on the hot seat

Was Popovich close to retiring last year?

Kyle Busch continues historic run with Brickyard win

WATCH: Mike Trout HR lands in 'Trout Net'

With Cueto dealt, what's the market for other pitchers?

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker