As the weeks go on and the Roger Clemens trial begins to be buried further within the marginalia of the sports page, I’ve started to wonder if I’m beating a dead horse. Is this really that important? Is the state of the game really in as much peril as I fear?
The estranged wife of Brian McNamee, Clemens’ chief accuser, was expected to take the stand as a defense witness in the ongoing trial as soon as Thursday. Today, Judge Reggie Walton told Clemens’ lawyers as well as the prosecutors that, before Eileen McNamee would be allowed to testify, both sides had to prepare briefs explaining their positions on why she was testifying in the first place.
I guess I’m not the only one who’s begun to wonder where the heck this is all going. At issue is whether Eileen McNamee will receive immunity for her possible role in a prescription drug probe that also involved her husband. Is there anyone involved here that’s above the board?
Like Andy Pettitte, Walton needs to figure out what Eileen McNa...