Originally posted on Optimum Scouting  |  Last updated 9/28/12

The storyline of 2011 meets the storyline of 2012 in this comparison of former Baylor Bear Robert Griffin III and West Virginia quarterback Geno Smith.  Eerily similar to Robert Griffin III in 2011, Geno Smith has gotten off to a red-hot start, completing a remarkable 81.4% of his 118 passes for over 1,000 yards, 12 touchdown passes, and a 191.2 quarterback.

To compare those numbers with the 2011-2012 season Heisman Trophy winner, Robert Griffin III completed two more passes, with 98 completions through 118 attempts, for over 1,300 yards, 18 touchdowns, and a 228.9 quarterback rating. And while I added up Robert Griffin’s first 4 games of the 2011 season and his first 6 pass attempts versus Iowa State to equal Geno Smith’s pass attempt total through 3 games, what must be understood in comparing these two players, is the difference in offensive principles between Baylor and West Virginia.



Heisman-like Numbers
Much more pro-styled in their passing concepts with a heavy dose of curl, bench, dig, drive, and post routes, West Virginia has given Geno Smith on average 12 more pass attempts per game than Robert Griffin in the same time span -through the first 3 games of the season. With Baylor’s offense, the inverted-veer and zone read game set up a much more potent deep passing game, as they averaged 241 yards rushing through the first 3 games of the 2011 season –that stands in direct contrast to West Virginia’s inconsistent rushing attack that produced 331 yards in week 1 versus Marshall and a meager 25 yards in week 3 versus Maryland.

So why do I throw those numbers at you? Well, to tell the true story behind Robert Griffin III’s 12-yards per pass attempt average and Geno Smith’s 9 yards per pass attempt average. While West Virginia has an explosive offense, it must be noted how special Baylor’s offense was in 2011. In terms of production through the first 3 games of the year, Robert Griffin III wins with his extraordinarily efficient and explosive early season performance. In sum, Smith is deadly in the short-to-intermediate passing game, while Robert Griffin III torched secondaries in 2011 with deep, down the field throws.


Comparing the two, as NFL Draft Prospects
Now, the biggest difference between Robert Griffin III and Geno Smith, without question is their respective pro-readiness prior to their final seasons as college quarterbacks.

In evaluating Griffin prior to his 2011 season, I had a hard time giving a 4th round grade, due to his lack of pocket presence, awkward throwing mechanics, and inconsistent ball placement. And while he had improved and progressed through each season at Baylor, Griffin still appeared to be more of an athletic thrower than a quarterback with athleticism.

Very much the opposite, Geno Smith impressed me with a number of things, but in particular: his ability to manipulate the pocket and adjust to collapsing pressure, a consistent, snapping throwing motion and ideal throwing mechanics, and outstanding ball placement to all levels of the field. As our #2 rated senior quarterback, Smith earned a top 15-preseason grade.

What separated these two prospects in preseason evaluations inevitably came down to ability to progress through multiple targets with sustained accuracy to all levels of the field. Geno Smith had already shown development with footwork, eye discipline, and coverage reading, whereas Robert Griffin III really struggled when his primary target was covered, and he was forced to reset his feet to secondary targets and react to pressure.

Enter the 2011 season for RG3, and scouts saw a completely reinvented quarterback. Impressing with improvements to his pocket movements, footwork, mechanics, accuracy, and coverage reading, it was clear early in the season that Griffin would declare for the draft, as a high round prospect. Flipping the script of being an exceptional athlete playing the quarterback position, Griffin’s elite athletic ability took a back seat to a more pocket passing style of play. Combining his plus arm talent with deep ball accuracy and comfort inside the pocket, RG3 progressed into the Top 5 pick that he was more than capable of becoming.

Shifting towards the 2012 season, Geno Smith’s early success should not come as a surprise to those who broke down his 2011 game film. Arm talent, accuracy to all levels of the field, pocket presence, and control of the game are all major pluses for Smith, which is consistent with preseason evaluations and an excellent sign for his future prospects in the NFL.

Hitting his receivers in stride without inhibiting their momentum after the catch, Smith assists his speedy receivers by delivering a catchable, on target, and on time throw. Dialing down his fastball on short drags and crossing patterns, while being able to drive the deep comeback, post, or bench route with zip, Geno Smith showcases elite ball control and natural throwing ability that few college quarterbacks possess.

More impressive than his ball control and accuracy however, is the way Geno Smith maneuvers within the pocket, sliding laterally, climbing or retreating from pressure as necessary. Never rattled with interior pressure, Smith keeps his eye level down the field, while maintaining a firm throwing base, active feet, and instinctive movements to avoid the rush and stay focused on the coverage.

Again, in terms of pure quarterbacking skills, Geno Smith is further developed than Robert Griffin III was in 2011, yet lacks the same upside that Griffin posed. Physically, the two signal callers are nearly identical with their body types, each measuring a shade less than 6’3 and weighing in the 220-pound range. Lean and athletic, both quarterbacks possess the movement skills and athleticism to make plays with their feet. Griffin, being an accomplished track star, obviously is a much more explosive dual threat; however, Geno Smith’s running ability should not be undervalued in any way, as he can and will pick up first downs when given space.


The Final Analysis
In differentiating these two prospects, it’s clear that Geno Smith is following Robert Griffin III’s footsteps in becoming the next hot prospect and potential top 5 overall draft choice. Their production, physical build, arm talent, accuracy, and explosive supporting casts are remarkably similar, but the intriguing aspect of this comparison, is how much further developed Geno Smith appears to be. Not the Olympic hurdler that Griffin was, or possessing the same 4.4 speed, Geno Smith has become the player he is today, through polished throwing mechanics, precise footwork, and feel for the game.

So in a sense, the choice of which quarterback is better than the other ultimately comes down to what you value more –high floor or high ceiling. Robert Griffin III’s combination of deep passing ability and elite athletic attributes paint a stark contrast to Geno Smith’s calculated approach and highly accurate arm. To me, Geno Smith is every bit, worthy of the top 5 pick that RG3 warranted, especially for teams in need of a franchise quarterback.

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Bryce Harper has great response to $400 million contract question

Cavs discussed three-team deal that would net them Melo

Celtics reportedly discussing Kevin Love trade

New York Giants to pursue Matt Forte?

Joe Mauer to try wearing sunglasses to improve pitch tracking

Charles Woodson joining ESPN's 'Sunday NFL Countdown' team

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

A’s land Khris Davis from Brewers for prospects

Family of deceased Kyle Field construction worker awarded $53 million by jury

Chris Bosh to miss All-Star Game with calf injury, Al Horford to replace

NBA commissioner Adam Silver supports bringing sports betting in to the light

Mets pitcher Jenrry Mejia becomes first player ever banned by MLB for PEDs

Eight bold predictions for NBA All-Star Weekend

Why the Virginia Cavaliers are a National Championship contender

Cardiff City owner tells team to shoot more, because ugly men can marry beautiful women

Report: American Pharoah will make $35 million as stud in 2016

City hosts Tottenham in Valentine’s Day clash

Ranking the ten best free agent pitcher signings

Is there a place for Aaron Hill with the Brewers?

The market for forwards may shape the NHL trade deadline

Who had the best NBA All-Star Game of the last 40 years?

The winners and losers of the 2016 MLB offseason

The most intriguing NBA story lines for the rest of the season

Report: Timberwolves ‘lament’ Andrew Wiggins missing weight-lifting sessions

Kevin Durant to the Warriors makes little sense

City of Atlanta, Braves fighting over iconic Hank Aaron statue

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
OPTIMUM SCOUTING

Ranking the ten best free agent pitcher signings

Who had the best NBA All-Star Game of the last 40 years?

The winners and losers of the 2016 MLB offseason

On Kobe Bryant and taking greatness for granted

Bucks need to choose between wins, development

Fantasy booking WrestleMania 32

Unrestricted free agents each team must consider re-signing

QUIZ: Name the winners of the NBA Slam Dunk Contest

Thank you Daniel Bryan

The timeless greatness of Jaromir Jagr

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker