Originally posted on Player Perspective  |  Last updated 11/8/12
Generally enjoy Dan Wetzel’s work over at Yahoo, if you haven’t seen his work on the Sandusky trial definitely give it a look. Today I was on his page, and I ran across his column on why he thinks anonymous player polls need to be stopped. What spurred the column was the latest “dirtiest player” polls that were released as well as some anonymous comments against Dominic Raiola and NY Jets coach Rex Ryan. Wetzel argues that there’s no value in the polls that ask “negative” questions like “most overrated” player etc. And he says anonymous commentary should be reserved for situations in which the truth needs to be revealed without consequence — not for what Wetzel classifies as rip jobs. [To read what I think of player polls and anonymous criticism click Read More] To the first point, I think there absolutely IS value to the questions that are asked in the negative. By and large, the media tells the public what is going on in the locker rooms, how different players are viewed and that sort of thing. The anonymous polls give us insight into how the players perceive their peers independent of what the media tells the fans. I, for one, was shocked to read that players voted Sanchez as most overrated. I mean, who is over-praising Sanchez? Do players confuse overrated with “talked about too much.” If so, that makes sense that Tebow and Sanchez found themselves atop the list. So while I’m in favor of the polls, I do wish they were more robust. However, I will admit, that utility is certainly not why the lists were created. They were created to get hits/clicks/reads. Moving along, as Ryan pointed out, even though his name appeared as most overrated coach, his name would probably be atop the list of coaches players want to play for. If you remember in polls past, players have both lambasted Patriots Coach Belichick AND stated they’d want to play for him. So, in that sense, a negative isn’t even really a negative. And that particular result was pretty telling. I interpreted it as more often than not, players can stomach being led by someone they dislike as long as winning is involved. In terms of the “dirtiest” player polls, I think they, too, are valuable. it lets us know what kind of behaviors players think is acceptable and where they are drawing the line these days. Many people have argued that Detroit Lions Ndamukong Suh (who has, again, topped the list of dirtiest players) isn’t dirty, rather behind the times in terms of how players currently conduct themselves on the field. But it’s clear the players find fault in his actions whether he’s behind the times or not. I think that’s interesting to know. In terms of allowing folks to insult or criticize others in their industry anonymously, I don’t  like it but I also realize it is common enough to be impossible to stop. Whenever members of the media want to prove a point in their own columns they often take anonymous sources who speak negatively about the person they’re profiling. Now Wetzel may argue that that is necessary in those circumstances for “the truth” to come out, but that would still nullify his point about the childishness of public figures having to respond to anonymous opinions. Plus, saying that rip jobs based on opinion shouldn’t be done anonymously is essentially ripping the entire media’s practices and methodology. And maybe they need to be ripped… but it’s odd that this would be a final straw for anyone. To Wetzel’s point about the victims of anonymous screeds having to defend themselves, I’d argue that they don’t. Coach Ryan or anyone else could say “that person, whoever they are, is entitled to their opinion” and keep it cracking. That would discourage outlets like Pro Football Weekly from going back and forth between two people and hyping up a war of words. I’d personally love to hear players and coaches and GMs talk about each other more often but as has always been the case, stating an opinion that is remotely critical of someone else to the media can turn into something much bigger than what the person intended. When guys are honest, the media eats it up but still with a “tsk tsk” cause nobody likes “trash talk “and “classlessness”  (yeah right). There really is no such thing as an innocent criticism, especially not with the media covering athletes 24 hours a day. That’s why anonymity can afford some of the best insight into the culture of the league. I do, however, think that player polls should include more players. Sometimes I fear the polls are a little like the NFL’s top 100 list where you can’t find even one player who participated in the voting. At any rate, if Wetzel has a problem with anonymous rip jobs, then he should definitely write something on how draft prospects are victims of character assassination just for the sake of manipulating their value. That’s a topic I feel strongly about and have addressed many times. You can read Wetzel’s column here.     Related Posts:Eagles Players’ Opinions Vary When Asked About Prospect of Gay TeammateQ&A With (Anonymous) Gay Division I College Football PlayerBleacher Report Lists 25 Dirtiest Players–Steelers Dirtiest Team and One Glaring OmissionWoman Says She’s Selling Nude Photos of T.O. Because He Stopped Skyping With HerNdamukong Suh says there’s nothing about his hits that would cause concussions
MORE FROM YARDBARKER:
Cult of Sport: Before there was Ezekiel Elliott, there was Eric Dickerson
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Willie Taggart just savaged Brady Hoke during his first Oregon press conference

Carmelo blows off Jackson's ball hog remarks, looks 'annoyed'

Sandoval's career fell 'into an abyss' after getting 'complacent'

Report: NFL believes Oakland ‘has no strong desire’ to keep the Raiders

Aroldis Chapman explains why he chose to return to Yankees

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Brandon Marshall: Bryce Petty used to be ‘fat and overweight’

NFL: Ezekiel Elliott investigation is still ‘active’ and ‘ongoing’

Report: Relationship between Jeff Fisher, Rams GM is ‘toxic’

Ex-Eagle: Strippers told him that Donovan McNabb hated him

Admiral rips Kaepernick during Pearl Harbor speech

Kevin Love has great tweet about his mucous malfunction

Sporting life: Gifts for the fan who is always on point

Matt Ryan is now Mr. Pick-Two

MLB Winter Meetings report, Day 3: News, notes and rumors

Four stinkiest games remaining on the 2016 NFL schedule

Ten young NBA players developing into stars

TailGreater: Tips for bowl travelers

Ranking the single-player modes of the 2017 sports games

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Box Score 12/7: The date we got to know Bo

MLB Winter Meetings report, Day 2: News, notes and rumors

Ten most intriguing non-NY6 bowl games

Breaking down the NFL playoff picture heading into Week 14

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Sporting life: Gifts for the fan who is always on point

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Matt Ryan is now Mr. Pick-Two

MLB Winter Meetings report, Day 3: News, notes and rumors

TailGreater: Tips for bowl travelers

Ranking the single-player modes of the 2017 sports games

The five best (and worst) times athletes hosted 'SNL'

The five must-have sports games of 2016

The five 2016 Heisman finalists: How do they measure up?

Sporting life: Gifts for real fans (that aren't ugly NFL Christmas sweaters)

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker