Originally posted on Fox Sports Southwest  |  Last updated 4/1/13
IRVING, Texas -- To fully understand quarterback Tony Romo's new contract with the Dallas Cowboys, you must understand that it's actually four different contracts. On Friday afternoon, Romo's agent fed to the media the blockbuster number: Six years and 108 million. That was the first number released into the ether. So it is destined to stick. Minutes later, I spoke to Cowboys vice president Stephen Jones, the club's point man for the negotiations. It occurred to me that the initial reports seemed vague in regard to whether the "six years" represented the entire stem-to-stern term of the agreement. "It's one plus six," Jones told me. Meaning the one remaining year plus six additional years. Stem-to-stern: Seven years and 119 million. Mixed into this is the 55 million guaranteed, which includes a 25 million signing bonus. And then there is the fourth, most important, most "real" number: Four years and 65 million. So which is is? In a sense, depending on how you examine it, Tony Romo's contract is actually four different contracts. Contract 1: CAA wants the world to know it's six years and 108 million. Why? The "108" number is a headline-getter and those numbers, divided up, create the impression that CAA won its client a deal worth 18 million a year. Contract 2: Jones tells me the full deal is seven years and 119 million. What's the difference? Those numbers, divided up, reduces the annual worth to 17 million. Contract 3: What matters most to the client? Guaranteed money, of course. This is CAA's real win: The 55 million guaranteed is a notch behind Tom Brady's record 57 million guarantee, a notch ahead of Joe Flacco's 52 million guarantee and a perfect match with Drew Brees' 55 million guarantee. (Soon to join this crowd: Aaron Rodgers, Matt Ryan and probably Matthew Stafford, with their representatives interested in headline-grabbing "100-million" stuff but with 50-million-plus guarantees the true test of the negotiations.) Again, Romo's "win" in these negotiations is the guaranteed money. Contract 4: The team's win: This is, as a practical matter, really a four-year contract worth 65 million. Divide that up and it's 16 million a year. and suddenly, the Romo price tag doesn't seem quite so exorbitant at all. How can this be only a four-year deal? The structure of the contract allows for that flexibility. There is money that can be moved around starting in 2014. (That includes ways to create cap room for the club.) There is the usual manner of escaping a contract gone bad, which includes renegotiating down as Romo gets older and theoretically less effective. There is 40 million worth of "base salary" listed in the deal (for the 2018 and 2019 seasons) that Romo may never see: he'll turn 38 after the 2017 season; there is no expectation from either side that Tony Romo will be the Dallas Cowboys' starting quarterback at age 38. The pressure is on Romo because the unwashed masses are going to stick with the 108 million number it's the most noted and it's the most bloated. But the smart money says Romo will never see that money. And due to the nature of his job as the centerpiece of a Dallas Cowboys franchise that habitually talks "Super Bowl," the four-years and 65 million the most important of Tony Romo's "four contracts" -- represents pressure enough.
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Jim Ross’ wife Jan dies from injuries due to Vespa crash

Report: Larry Brown to meet with LIU Brooklyn about coaching job

Report: Jay Cutler garnering 'zero' interest around NFL

Paul Millsap to opt out of contract, become free agent

Martellus Bennett calls out NFL to do more to build up communities

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

NBA disciplines Raptors’ Serge Ibaka, Bulls’ Robin Lopez for fighting

Jason Day tearfully withdraws from PGA event to be with ailing mother

Matt Barnes on Derek Fisher chants: ‘I’m sick of that s—’

Brent Musburger admits he once bet on a game he broadcasted

Jeff Hornacek: Knicks will run triangle ‘exclusively’ next season

Reese Witherspoon to speak to women’s gathering at NFL owners meetings

The 'Duke schadenfreude season came early this year' quiz

Which Sweet 16 team should you be rooting for?

The Aesthetic: The world of player exclusive sneakers

Box Score 3/22: Team USA is heading to the championship

NBA Referee Hotline Bling: Steph Curry pushes OKC's buttons

Lingering issues for each 2016 MLB postseason team

The 'With teammates like this, who needs rivals?' quiz

Re-ranking the Sweet 16 for the NCAA Tournament

Box Score 3/21: WBC semis are bat-flipping fun

What you need to know for the World Baseball Classic semis

NBA Western Conference bottom feeders to watch down the stretch

MLB players most likely to break out in 2017

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

The Aesthetic: The world of player exclusive sneakers

Which Sweet 16 team should you be rooting for?

NBA Referee Hotline Bling: Steph Curry pushes OKC's buttons

Lingering issues for each 2016 MLB postseason team

The 'With teammates like this, who needs rivals?' quiz

Re-ranking the Sweet 16 for the NCAA Tournament

What you need to know for the World Baseball Classic semis

Eastern Conference bottom feeders to watch down the stretch

Eat, Drink, Watch: A weekend of March Madness and more

The 'Who will ruin your glorious bracket this year?' quiz

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker