Originally written on Waiting For Next Year  |  Last updated 3/13/12

ASHBURN, VA - JULY 30: Defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth #92 of the Washington Redskins walks to the locker room following the opening day of training camp July 30, 2009 in Ashburn, Virginia. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

I was very confused when I learned yesterday that the NFL would be penalizing the Redskins and Cowboys for contracts they re-worked in the uncapped year. It seemed very strange because the NFL seemingly lets teams re-work deals all the time so that they can free up cap space. So what was so different about what the Redskins and Cowboys did that got them into trouble?

First of all, most teams normally use restructuring to free up cap space. The NFL seemingly knew that an uncapped year could be used by teams to circumvent future salary caps by dumping as much salary as possible into 2010 as the uncapped year. They warned teams against doing it a reported six different times with letters from the front office. Those letters apparently warned teams that they risked being punished under the rules of the new CBA if they engaged in activities that would lead to circumventing the re-established salary cap. The Redskins and Cowboys gambled, and if the NFL’s penalty holds up, they will be punished.

Still, what, exactly did they do that broke the rules?

The Redskins are the most egregious example. In 2010 the Redskins were slated to have a salary number of $141.6 million. This included large salaries and bonuses for Albert Haynesworth and Deangelo Hall. The Redskins had a $21 million option bonus for Haynesworth that they converted to a signing bonus. No problem there. Teams do this all the time. They convert it into a signing bonus and then they can spread the bonus out over the length of the deal. This routinely saves cap space for teams that owe superstar players large bonuses. The NFL has no problem with it.

The Redskins didn’t aim to spread the contract out, though. They aimed to dump it in 2010. The problem this time is that the NFL had this one uncapped year. The Redskins used a sneaky little provision in the contract called a “voidable” provision. This means that Haynesworth would take the $21 million signing bonus and then he could void his own contract at any time after 2010. Of course in order to void his deal, Haynesworth would have had to pay back his signing bonus or at least some arbitrator-determined unearned portion of it. As we all know, that was never ever going to happen. But that little provision allowed the Redskins to take every penny of Haynesworth’s signing bonus and apply it to 2010 as opposed to spreading it out over the length of the contract.

Taking all the salary in one season is fine in a normally capped season because you are taking the hit presumably under the cap to create future flexibility. The Redskins used this one-off season to create future flexibility because they have an owner with extremely deep pockets.

The Redskins did the same thing with Deangelo Hall and all of a sudden instead of taking $141.6 million in 2010, the Redskins took $170 million all at once. So all of a sudden when the new CBA got signed the Redskins and their fans were sitting flush and ready to go with $31+ million under the cap. The NFL deemed that to be abusive to the system, got the player’s association to sign off on it and the penalties were levied in the amounts of Haynesworth’s $21 million and Hall’s $15 million for a total of $36 million.

ProFootballTalk is making noise about how this equates to collusion of NFL teams against the player’s association and I don’t have much standing to disagree, necessarily. At the same time, it is in the best interest of the league to have some form of level playing field financially. If the NFL wanted to have some kind of “amnesty” rule like the NBA then it would have been fair because every team could have done it.

Say what you want about Roger Goodell and the NFL, but this is one of the nice things if your team is in a small market. Rich guys like Daniel Snyder and Jerry Jones push the limits of the rules because they have the most money and they don’t get away with it. Some may argue that these two teams played within the rules, but we should all be able to agree it was outside the spirit of the rules. It is in the NFL’s best interest to keep people from constantly pressing the boundaries of the rules.

Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Brady issues statement on Facebook after having suspension lifted

Don Orsillo reportedly asked to lie about being fired by NESN

Matt Cassel believes Bills will keep three quarterbacks

St. Louis police seize scalpers' World Series tickets to give to friends

Eli Manning happy Tom Brady will play NFL season opener

Phil Kessel has shed 13 pounds this summer


Cam Newton addresses ‘gang’ photo on Instagram

Steelers defense is younger and faster but not better

Duke basketball to visit White House next Tuesday

Report: Cowboys have interest in Broncos RB Montee Ball

NFL owners to discuss changing Goodell's disciplinary role

Report: Eagles trade Matt Barkley to Arizona Cardinals

WATCH: Ben Revere gifted Matt Wieters a home run

Judge Sarah Thomas as an NFL official, not a female NFL official

Redskins skip Robert Griffin III in jersey countdown

Wisconsin vs Alabama preview

Simona Halep popular with fans who want to kiss her

Patriots planned on raising a "Brady banner on opening night

Braves and Phillies sucking at the same time is rare

Montana St. linebacker delivers bone crushing hit in opener

Despite loss, all eyes still on Jim Harbaugh, Wolverines

Kirk Cousins discusses what it’s like to be called ‘Kurt’

Playoffs or not, Bryce Harper is the NL MVP

Donald Sterling’s wife Shelly seeking alimony

Chicago Bears and Jay Cutler: A love/hate relationship

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Wisconsin vs Alabama preview

Tom Brady issues statement on Facebook

Robert Griffin III and a dream deferred

Best, worst surprises of NFL preseason

The Gospel Of Harbaugh prepares for its ultimate test of faith

Meet the Utah Utes, the pluckiest program in college football

Iman Shumpert will name daughter Iman Shumpert Jr.

Dallas company celebrates Romo with DirecTV 'crownies'

Top 10 storylines for Week 4 of the NFL preseason

Matt Williams is still hopelessly married to the idea of the closer’s role

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Follow Yardbarker