Originally written on The Victory Formation  |  Last updated 3/13/12

Yesterday, news broke that the Washington Redskins and Dallas Cowboys would be docked millions of dollars in salary cap space over the next two seasons due to the way they structured contracts in the 2010 league year, which did not have a salary cap.  Additionally, the New Orleans Saints and Oakland Raiders will be punished, although not as harshly.  Those two teams will merely unable to expand their salary cap as the other teams in the league will.  If this sounds the least bit fishy to you, that’s because it is.  What’s going on here is collusion, plain and simple.

Per Pro Football Talk, the owners were warned at least six times prior to the uncapped year to not use that season as a salary dumping ground.

Per a source with knowledge of the situation, the teams were told “at least six times” during ownership-level meetings that there would be “serious consequences” for any team that used the uncapped year as an occasion to dump salaries.

There’s a very obvious reason these warnings were given in owner level meetings, and not via official memoranda.  Such documents would likely be available to the NLFPA, and as labor negotiations were gearing up (and the NFLPA was already alleging collusion), this tangible evidence of collusion would be devastating to the league.  So instead, the league notified each team (and reminded them several times) to not engage in activity that would create salary cap room for subsequent seasons where a cap would be in place.  The net effect of this collusion would be to depress player salaries.  Lest you think that’s not a big deal, go ask any MLB owner their thoughts on the effects of collusion.  Additionally, the league approved the contracts submitted from these teams at the time so as not to tip their hand.  If a blatant salary dump contract (or restructuring) was rejected, it would certainly send up a red flag to the NFLPA, and it would be used as ammunition in the NFLPA’s collusion suit.

But where is the NFLPA in all of this?  For the moment, they stand mute.  Why is that?  The league raised the 2012 salary cap from $116 million to $120.6 million.  So for the moment, their silence on the issue is bought and paid for by the paltry sum of $128.8 million (when MLB settled their collusion case with the MLBPA in 1990, damages were paid out in the sum of $280 million, and led to the expansion of the league by four teams).

The Redskins and Cowboys have both issued statements that they complied with the rules during the uncapped year, and are preparing for the free agency period as per usual.  If the commissioner’s office plans on proceeding with the salary cap penalties, both organizations seem likely to contest the issue.  Quite simply, the fact that these teams are being punished for entering into contracts that were approved by the league office proves that there was a plan in place to control spending and player salaries.  And that is the very definition of collusion.

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Kobe responds to Aldridge report with funny meme

One pitch away: Carrasco loses no-hitter in bottom of the 9th

England loses World Cup semifinal to Japan in heartbreaking fashion

Braxton Miller had 'successful' check-up visit

Raptors signing Carroll is shrewdest move of free agency

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Report: Los Angeles Clippers will sign Paul Pierce

With Kevin Love retained, the Cavs can take care of LeBron

Aldridge crosses Lakers off list, did not mesh well with Kobe

Jerry Dipoto officially steps down as Angels GM

Report: Rajon Rondo wants 'all of' Kings' $10M cap space

Reports: Kevin Love, Tristan Thompson returning to Cavs

David West explains why he opted out of Pacers contract

Warriors, Draymond Green agree to 5-year, $85 million deal

Twins call up top prospect Miguel Sano

Robert Griffin III speaks at UN to advocate for protecting oceans

Cavaliers re-sign Iman Shumpert to four-year contract

Mike Green is joining the Red Wings on a three-year deal

Grading the deal: Davis commits to Pelicans until 2020

ESPN denies censoring Keith Olbermann commentary

The best and worst MLB players in the month of June

Report: Lakers didn’t make strong impression on Aldridge

Danny Green takes the Andre Iguodala path

DeSean Jackson rips Eagles in new reality TV show

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

With Love retained, the Cavs can take care of LeBron

Grading the deal: Davis commits to Pelicans

Obama Administration: Change name if Redskins move to D.C.

Deciding what the All-Star Game means

Odell Beckham Jr. offered professional baseball contract

Orioles keep finding a way to win

Lloyd sends USWNT to World Cup final

Selecting the 2015 AL All-Stars

NBA Draft grades: Eastern Conference

Under the radar NBA free agents

Michael Sam, boyfriend broke up?

Mickelson linked to money laundering?

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.