Originally written on The Victory Formation  |  Last updated 11/19/14

Yesterday, news broke that the Washington Redskins and Dallas Cowboys would be docked millions of dollars in salary cap space over the next two seasons due to the way they structured contracts in the 2010 league year, which did not have a salary cap.  Additionally, the New Orleans Saints and Oakland Raiders will be punished, although not as harshly.  Those two teams will merely unable to expand their salary cap as the other teams in the league will.  If this sounds the least bit fishy to you, that’s because it is.  What’s going on here is collusion, plain and simple.

Per Pro Football Talk, the owners were warned at least six times prior to the uncapped year to not use that season as a salary dumping ground.

Per a source with knowledge of the situation, the teams were told “at least six times” during ownership-level meetings that there would be “serious consequences” for any team that used the uncapped year as an occasion to dump salaries.

There’s a very obvious reason these warnings were given in owner level meetings, and not via official memoranda.  Such documents would likely be available to the NLFPA, and as labor negotiations were gearing up (and the NFLPA was already alleging collusion), this tangible evidence of collusion would be devastating to the league.  So instead, the league notified each team (and reminded them several times) to not engage in activity that would create salary cap room for subsequent seasons where a cap would be in place.  The net effect of this collusion would be to depress player salaries.  Lest you think that’s not a big deal, go ask any MLB owner their thoughts on the effects of collusion.  Additionally, the league approved the contracts submitted from these teams at the time so as not to tip their hand.  If a blatant salary dump contract (or restructuring) was rejected, it would certainly send up a red flag to the NFLPA, and it would be used as ammunition in the NFLPA’s collusion suit.

But where is the NFLPA in all of this?  For the moment, they stand mute.  Why is that?  The league raised the 2012 salary cap from $116 million to $120.6 million.  So for the moment, their silence on the issue is bought and paid for by the paltry sum of $128.8 million (when MLB settled their collusion case with the MLBPA in 1990, damages were paid out in the sum of $280 million, and led to the expansion of the league by four teams).

The Redskins and Cowboys have both issued statements that they complied with the rules during the uncapped year, and are preparing for the free agency period as per usual.  If the commissioner’s office plans on proceeding with the salary cap penalties, both organizations seem likely to contest the issue.  Quite simply, the fact that these teams are being punished for entering into contracts that were approved by the league office proves that there was a plan in place to control spending and player salaries.  And that is the very definition of collusion.

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Report: Kobe Bryant likely to retire following next season

Don Shula named in painkiller lawsuit from former NFL players

Kyrie Irving questionable for Game 2 versus Atlanta

Michael Sam signs with CFL’s Montreal Alouettes

Ex-A&M quarterback Kenny Hill transferring to TCU

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Michael Bennett compares Pete Carroll to Willy Wonka

Jim Kelly: There is no doubt Tom Brady cheated

Warriors hang on, edge Rockets in Game 2 thriller

Farrell 'not ruling anything out' as Red Sox's struggles persist

Gretzky: Connor McDavid could be the next Gretzky

Bucs' Clint McDonald: Jameis Winston already leading team

Re-evaluating all 30 MLB teams at the quarter mark, ranked

Is virtual reality training the next leap forward for football?

Warriors a very shaky 2-0 against the Rockets

NFL icon Bud Grant zings Pats with Deflategate joke on Twitter

RG3 announces birth daughter's birth on social media

Don't listen to Nick Saban, the bowl system is just fine

MLB scores partial victory in minor league wage lawsuits

Ranking the NBA Playoffs' most significant injuries

WATCH: Will Smith ejected for foreign substance on arm

Guy behind NFL's social media trolling of Pats is a Jets fan?

In defense of 76ers general manager Sam Hinkie

Madison Bumgarner homered off of Clayton Kershaw

NFL News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Jim Kelly: No doubt Tom Brady cheated

Post-combine NBA Draft big board: Top 30

Ex-players sue NFL for conspiring to push painkillers

Astros surprising, but can get better with Correa

Here come the Giants

Aaron Hernandez got new tattoo in prison

TUF weekly recap by NOS® Energy Drink

Ten players who could benefit due to PAT rule change

Five QBs set for breakout campaigns

Report: Lakers will pursue Thibodeau

MLS leaders struggling with attendance

LBS: I was a contestant on Sports Jeopardy!

Today's Best Stuff
For Bloggers

Join the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money.

Company Info
Help
What is Yardbarker?

Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond.