Should John Terry have been stripped of his captaincy? Should he even be selected for England’s squad during the upcoming Euro 2012 Championships?
John Terry has been stripped of the England captaincy.
The 31-year-old Chelsea centre-back was informed of the decision by FA chairman David Bernstein last Friday.
The FA made their decision surrounding allegations of Terry racially abusing a fellow footballer. Terry is due to stand trial in July after an incident with QPR’s Anton Ferdinand, to which Terry has entered a plea of not guilty to the charge
Losing the England captaincy is not new for Terry. He has lost the privilege of leading his country on to the pitch once previously.
In a statement, the FA said Terry would not “captain the England team until the allegations against him are resolved.”
It continues: “The FA board expected the trial to be concluded prior to the European Championship.
“Further to Wednesday’s confirmation that the trial will not take place until after the tournament, the board has discussed the matter in detail and has collectively decided it is in the interests of all parties that John has the responsibilities of captaincy removed at this time.
“This decision has been taken due to the higher profile nature of the England captaincy, on and off the pitch, and the additional demands and requirements expected of the captain leading into and during a tournament.”
The FA said Capello was free to select Terry for the Netherlands friendly in February and Euro 2012, and many expect he will follow through with that decision.
Capello took a strong stand on the issue. The Italian made it clear to the FA that he believes “everybody is innocent until proven guilty,” therefore Terry should not be stripped of the captaincy for the time being.
Capello has a history of siding with the Chelsea talisman. The first time the Terry was sacked as England captain, it was Capello who tried to ease the pressure off of Terry, rather than publicly humiliate him for the problems his private life would cause in the dressing room. Somewhat understandably, Capello expressed his support for Terry because his sole purpose is to win trophies for England, and has no interest in the politics of English football.
Although the circumstances surrounding Terry’s previous sacking as captain were different than those currently, they still created a similar uneasiness in the dressing room. Terry was previously stripped of the captaincy in 2010, following allegations he had an affair with the ex-girlfriend of Wayne Bridge, an England teammate.
Terry was reinstated 13 months later, with Capello saying, “one year of punishment is enough.”
The FA has received support from other influential sports figured. England sports minister Hugh Robertson stated, “I completely support the FA’s decision. It would have been impossible for John Terry to have continued as captain with this charge over his head.”
What we have on our hands in a man, who in the span of two years, is now known throughout the league, and among his colleagues and fans, as a racist and an adulterer.
Now, what can’t be forgotten is that the charges against Terry are still allegations, but I pose this question: can allegations make you feel differently about someone? I would answer “yes.”
If you were a teammate of John Terry, would you feel the same about him? Maybe it wouldn’t matter to you, so long as he leads England to victory after victory. But what if you were Glen Johnson, or Ashley Cole (the typical starting right and left backs for England, respectively). Johnson and Cole, both black athletes, may not hold the same trust they once held for Terry. And if they do not? The result would be a poisoned team. First it could be a quick comment here, a shouting match there. But when it could become an intentional botched pass here, or ‘forgetting’ to cover for a teammate there, it has gone too far.
Not to mention, Terry is probably not trusted with teammate’s wives and girlfriends, given his track record. (Hide yo’ kids, hide yo’ wives. Sorry, I had to.)
I’d also like to pose this question – as a fan of hockey, and (for most of the readership here on TSS) Team Canada, would you want an alleged racist and adulterer as your country’s captain?
Would you be able to think of Scott Niedermayer the same if he shouted something awful at Jerome Iginla?
Would you be able to hold Ryan Smyth in the same light if you knew he had slept with Shane Doan’s wife?
For me, one thing I love about Canadian hockey players is their ability to avoid negative press. Whether this is due to tabloid journalism not being as rampant in Canada as in England, or rather Canadian hockey players are simply just better people… it’s tough to say.
Still, many Canadians would not want someone with such a tainted reputation to lead their country in a major championship. For an alleged racist and adulterer to be a member of the team, that’s one thing. Skill alone can secure a place on a squad. But when it comes to representing not only your team, but also your country on such a grand stage, your captain must be a person that embodies values that your country holds dear.
To allow Terry to continue as captain would mean England condones the acts for which Terry has been charged.
For these reasons, John Terry should not captain the England side, despite the charges being allegations.
England deserves better.