Yardbarker
Yardbarker
x
20 facts you might not know about Jaws
Universal Studios

20 facts you might not know about Jaws

Why are people afraid of sharks? There are a few potential reasons, but “Jaws” is probably high on that list. Steven Spielberg’s breakout film found critical acclaim and also a ton of commercial success. If you have only seen “Jaws” once or dozens of times – or perhaps never seen it before but just know it from its reputation – here are 20 facts that might educate you on the shark that made you afraid to get in the water.

 
1 of 20

“Jaws” was inspired by a best-selling book inspired by real events

“Jaws” was inspired by a best-selling book inspired by real events
Universal

“Jaws” began life as a novel by the author Peter Benchley, one of the credited screenwriters on the movie as well. The book was inspired by a lifelong interest in sharks, especially a 1964 story about a fisherman named Frank Mundus who caught a two-ton great white shark off the shore of Montauk, New York. The book was on the bestseller list for 44 weeks, making it an obvious choice for a movie adaptation.

 
2 of 20

One of the screenwriters had a history in sitcom writing (and acting)

One of the screenwriters had a history in sitcom writing (and acting)
Universal

Benchley was joined by Carl Gottlieb to write the script. After winning an Emmy for his work on “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour,” Gottlieb also wrote for “The Bob Newhart Show” and “The Odd Couple.” As an actor, Gottlieb appeared in movies like “The Jerk” and “Clueless.” He’s also in “Jaws,” playing Harry Meadows.

 
3 of 20

Steven Spielberg was not the first choice to direct

Steven Spielberg was not the first choice to direct
Universal

Spielberg may be one of the biggest directors ever now, but back when the production for “Jaws” began he only had one feature to his name, “The Sugarland Express.” Producers initially wanted John Sturges, and Rick Richards was actually offered the job first. However, for some weird reason Richards kept calling the shark in the movie a “whale,” and producers dropped him and replaced him with Spielberg.

 
4 of 20

Spielberg was only 26 when he began directing “Jaws”

Spielberg was only 26 when he began directing “Jaws”
Universal

We mentioned that “Spielberg” had one feature to his name when he got the “Jaws” job. However, he had already worked in television, including directing 1971’s “Duel,” which got him a lot of attention and critical acclaim. Of course, he was already having an impressive career given his age. When Spielberg got the “Jaws” gig he was all of 26.

 
5 of 20

Robert Shaw almost didn’t act in the movie because he didn’t like the book

Robert Shaw almost didn’t act in the movie because he didn’t like the book
Universal

Can you imagine anybody but Shaw playing Quint? Well we almost had to do without him. When he was offered the role of the grizzled captain of the Orca, he didn’t really want the role. His problem? He thought Benchley’s novel wasn’t very good. However, his wife Midge Ure and his secretary suggested he take the role, and Shaw listened to them. The rest is film history.

 
6 of 20

Hooper is quite different in the book (and also doesn’t survive)

Hooper is quite different in the book (and also doesn’t survive)
Universal

Matt Hooper, played by Richard Dreyfuss, is a little annoying but mostly likeable. In the novel, though, he’s more odious. In particular, he has an affair with Chief Brody’s wife Ellen. Of course, in a way Hooper then gets his cosmic comeuppance. In the novel, when Hooper goes down in the shark cage he gets eaten. That was actually originally going to happen in the movie as well, but the storyline was altered during the filming.

 
7 of 20

Richard Dreyfuss was suggested to Spielberg by George Lucas

Richard Dreyfuss was suggested to Spielberg by George Lucas
Universal

Spielberg and Lucas are good buddies and often helped each other out. When Spielberg was looking for an actor to play Hooper, Lucas recommended he go with Dreyfuss. The actor had been in Lucas’ breakout film “American Graffiti,” and obviously made a good impression on the talented director. 

 
8 of 20

We were supposed to see way more of the shark

We were supposed to see way more of the shark
Universal

Multiple mechanical sharks were built for the making of the movie. However, they proved entirely unreliable. Spielberg had to maneuver around these problems and a lot of planned shots of the shark were instead filmed without the shark on screen. This actually proved to be quite suspenseful, and arguably made the movie even better.

 
9 of 20

“Jaws” had a nickname during production

“Jaws” had a nickname during production
Universal

The three full-sized mechanical sharks from the movie? The ones that didn’t work as expected? They were all given a nickname on set. The faux great whites were called Bruce in “honor” of Bruce Ramer, Spielberg’s lawyer.

 
10 of 20

“Jaws” was actually shot on the ocean, a Hollywood first

“Jaws” was actually shot on the ocean, a Hollywood first
Universal

The movie is set on the fictional island of Amity, but was shot around Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts. Martha’s Vineyard sits adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean, and Spielberg decided to shoot some of the film on location. “Jaws” was actually the first major movie to be filmed on the ocean, which certainly didn’t make production any easier.

 
11 of 20

“Jaws” basically invented the summer blockbuster

“Jaws” basically invented the summer blockbuster
Universal

Back in the day, movies were often released in a slow rollout. Films basically went on a road trip, opening in different areas across the country, staying there for a few weeks, and then moving on. “Jaws,” meanwhile, was released in 464 screens on June 20, the beginning of summer and quickly expanded to 700 screens by the end of July based on audience buzz. The idea of studios releasing their big blockbusters in summer? That effectively began with “Jaws.”

 
12 of 20

The film won three Oscars

The film won three Oscars
Universal

In addition to being a commercial smash, “Jaws” was nominated for several Academy Awards. While it didn’t win Best Picture, and Spielberg was annoyed he wasn’t even nominated for Best Director, it did win three Oscars including Best Film Editing, Best Original Sound, and Best Original Dramatic Score, which went to the legendary John Williams.

 
13 of 20

“Jaws” spawned a ton of imitators

“Jaws” spawned a ton of imitators
United Artists

A hit like “Jaws” is bound to spawn imitators. Perhaps the most infamous of those was “Piranha.” However, there were many more, including “Orca,” “Barracuda,” and “Mako: The Jaws of Death.” In fact, even “Alien” was pitched as “Jaws in Space.” Sadly none of the knock-offs could match "Jaws" place in movie history. 

 
14 of 20

The actress who played Chrissie spoofed herself in another Spielberg movie

The actress who played Chrissie spoofed herself in another Spielberg movie
Universal

Poor Chrissie didn’t stand a chance. All she wanted to do was get drunk and go skinny dipping, but instead ends up as the first victim in “Jaws,” an unsettling scene that sets the pace for the film. The actress, Susan Backline, would parody that opening in Spielberg’s “1941.” This time, instead of getting attacked by a shark, she ends up atop a submarine.

 
15 of 20

“You’re gonna need a bigger boat” was an adlib

“You’re gonna need a bigger boat” was an adlib
Universal

You know Brody’s iconic line “You’re gonna need a bigger boat?” You likely do. After all, it finished 33th on AFI’s top 100 movie quotes list. Well it wasn’t in the script. Roy Scheider adlibbed the line, making film history in the process.

 
16 of 20

The sharks were fake, but the slaps from Mrs. Kitner were real

The sharks were fake, but the slaps from Mrs. Kitner were real
Universal

Poor Mrs. Kitner loses her son because the beaches are opened in spite of the fact a great white was known to be in the premises. She takes her grief out on Brody, slapping him in the face. Unfortunately for Scheider, actress Lee Fierro couldn’t really fake a slap, so she actually hit Scheider on every take. He said in an interview it took 17 takes, and Fierro admitted that she once slapped him so hard his glasses flew off.

 
17 of 20

One line sparked the name of a production company

One line sparked the name of a production company
Universal

Chief Brody tells an elderly smoker teasing him “That’s some bad hat, Harry.” This line inspired the name of Bad Hat Harry Productions, which produced “House” and most of the “X-Men” films to date. 

 
18 of 20

“Mythbusters” put “Jaws” to the test

“Mythbusters” put “Jaws” to the test
Universal

The beloved Discovery show “Mythbusters” tested many movie myths and spent a lot of time on “Jaws” due to Discovery's connection with “Shark Week”. Some of the myths tested include if an oxygen tank would explode if shot and if a great white could actually punch a hole in the side of a wooden boat.

 
19 of 20

Shooting went a little longer than anticipated

Shooting went a little longer than anticipated
Universal

When Spielberg was given the go ahead to direct “Jaws,” he was allotted 55 days of shooting. In the end, it took Spielberg 159 days to wrap up production. In an interview with “The Roanoke Times” to celebrate the 30th anniversary of the film, Spielberg said he thought his career would be over because of how long over schedule he went. Fortunately for everybody, that wasn’t the case.

 
20 of 20

“Jaws” is an Oscar winner with a Razzie-winning sequel

“Jaws” is an Oscar winner with a Razzie-winning sequel
Universal

As we said, “Jaws” won three Oscars. It’s considered one of the best movies ever. "Jaws" related sequels -- not so much. The fourth film in the series, “Jaws: The Revenge” is considered one of the worst movies ever. It was nominated for seven Razzies, but luckily only won for Worst Visual Effects. 

Chris Morgan

Chris Morgan is a Detroit-based culture writer who has somehow managed to justify getting his BA in Film Studies. He has written about sports and entertainment across various internet platforms for years and is also the author of three books about '90s television.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

TODAY'S BEST

Five best NFL offseason value signings on offense: Bills get great deal with RB extension
NFL

Five best NFL offseason value signings on offense: Bills get great deal with RB extension

Few know how to spend money like an NFL front office. This offseason, teams handed out over $4 billion in extensions alone, not to mention the several other billions spent in free agency. But which were the shrewdest investments? Below, we examine the best value signings at five positions on offense: quarterback, running back, wide receiver, tight end and offensive line. Las Vegas Raiders quarterback Geno Smith Contract: Two years, $75 million ($65.5M guaranteed) Shortly after acquiring Smith in a trade from the Seattle Seahawks, the Raiders extended the 2022 Associated Press Comeback Player of the Year to a contract that raises the Raiders' floor while maintaining flexibility. Smith has a manageable $26.5M cap hit in 2026, when Over The Cap projects Las Vegas to have the third-most cap space ($78.7M) based on an estimated 5.8 percent cap increase. Since 2022, Smith has the third-highest completion percentage (68.5 percent) among 32 quarterbacks with at least 20 starts during that span. He's also tied with Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes for the second-most fourth-quarter comebacks (10) and trails only Mahomes in game-winning drives. Buffalo Bills running back James Cook Contract: Four years, $48M ($30M guaranteed) Los Angeles Rams running back Kyren Williams pierced Cook's bubble when he signed a three-year, $33M extension on Aug. 5. The Bills running back sought $15M per year, making his $12M in annual average value (AAV) a huge win for Buffalo. Over Cook's first three seasons, he's averaged 4.9 yards per carry. In 2024, he led the NFL with 16 rushing touchdowns. With just 533 career tackles, Cook doesn't have the wear-and-tear of other backs who've made splashes early in their careers, raising hopes that he can withstand the workload that comes with being Buffalo's featured back. Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Tee Higgins Contract: Four years, $115M ($40.9M guaranteed) The Bengals retained Higgins at a remarkable price, keeping him in Cincinnati at less than $30M per year, the going rate for the league's top wideouts. Per Spotrac, while Higgins is No. 10 in AAV among wide receivers, he ranks just outside the top 20 in guaranteed money. Last season, Higgins averaged 75.9 receiving yards per game, his most since 2021, and scored a career-high 10 touchdowns despite missing five games due to injury. Arizona Cardinals tight end Trey McBride Contract: Four years, $76M ($43M guaranteed) The 2024 first-team All-Pro ranks No. 1 among tight ends in guaranteed salary. However, if he continues producing numbers more akin to WR1s — last season, he had 111 receptions, 1,146 receiving yards and two touchdowns — his contract will be one of the league's better bargains. Baltimore Ravens offensive tackle Ronnie Stanley Contract: Three years, $60M ($44M guaranteed) Stanley's journey back from a devastating 2020 lower leg injury culminated in the 2019 first-team All-Pro being named a Pro Bowler for the second time in his first nine seasons last year. The No. 6 overall pick in the 2016 NFL Draft was rewarded with a contract that will keep him in Baltimore through his age-33 season. In terms of average annual value, his extension ranks below other left tackles who signed contracts this offseason, and not just younger players such as Rashawn Slater (Los Angeles Chargers), who was recently lost for the season, and Bernhard Raimann (Indianapolis Colts). Atlanta Falcons tackle Jake Matthews, 33, is averaging $22.5M on his current deal, while Las Vegas Raiders tackle Kolton Miller, 29, is set to earn $22M per year through 2028.

Commanders have major hang-up preventing them from paying Terry McLaurin what he's due
NFL

Commanders have major hang-up preventing them from paying Terry McLaurin what he's due

It’s been two weeks since Washington Commanders star wide receiver Terry McLaurin publicly revealed his trade request, and a resolution doesn’t appear to be in sight. Thanks to ESPN’s John Keim, we’re starting to get more insight into how the Commanders are approaching negotiations…and how they run counter to their star wide receiver’s financial desires. As we’ve assumed all along, the Commanders are wary of giving McLaurin a lucrative contract that would extend well into the player’s 30s. As Keim notes, the Commanders “rely heavily on analytics,” and those numbers aren’t particularly kind to receivers on the wrong side of 30. They may be onto something. Per ESPN Research, over the past five years, only three receivers 31 years or older have played at least 10 games and averaged 70-plus receiving yards per game (that number jumps to six players if you adjust for 60-plus receiving yards). Further, the team can simply point to the NFL landscape, as other teams are also clearly wary of paying aging wideouts. Among the 24 active wide receivers who are attached to the most guaranteed money, only Tyreek Hill was older than 30 when the deal was signed. McLaurin has continually pointed to his lack of mileage despite his age; he barely played during his first two years at Ohio State, meaning he may not have the same wear and tear as similar players his age. McLaurin is also naturally pointing to the stat sheet, as the receiver has continually produced despite uncertain QB play, uncertain ownership and a handful of different coaching staffs. Per Keim, the Commanders don’t want to pay McLaurin based on his past performance, with the front office preferring to shape any future contracts based on his projections for age-31-plus seasons. The organization also doesn’t want to set a new precedent by paying McLaurin, as it could convince future veterans to push for lucrative deals in their 30s. While McLaurin has taken the drastic measure of requesting a trade out of Washington, the organization is still convinced they have leverage in this showdown. After all, the player is still under contract for the 2025 campaign, meaning McLaurin will have to forfeit game checks if he sits out games. The team could even choose to slap him with the franchise tag next offseason (which could come in north of $30M), meaning they’re in full control of the player’s fate moving forward. The team is also skeptical that another suitor is going to willingly pay McLaurin the type of money he’s seeking. Per Keim, there’s doubts around the league about whether another team would be willing to meet the receiver’s demands. Even if a clear suitor does emerge, Keim makes it clear that Washington’s front office won’t give the star away without receiving a haul. We heard recently that McLaurin wasn’t necessarily seeking a deal that matched fellow 2019 draftee D.K. Metcalf‘s deal with the Steelers. However, Keim says Metcalf’s contract has generally served as a guide for McLaurin, but it’s uncertain whether the Commanders wideout is looking to match the AAV ($33M) or total guarantees ($60M). Ultimately, one source believes the Commanders may agree to pay McLaurin a contract that will pay $28M per year. Of course, it’s uncertain if the player would even accept that offer. If that hypothetical maximum offer doesn’t end in a signing, a divorce may be the logical next step.

Cowboys fans won't like Jerry Jones' update on Micah Parsons standoff
NFL

Cowboys fans won't like Jerry Jones' update on Micah Parsons standoff

With the regular season approaching, the Dallas Cowboys should be aiming to extend EDGE Micah Parsons promptly. But they're still in no rush to do that. Parsons is set to play on the fifth-year option of his rookie contract in 2025 and has requested a trade. Dallas insists it has no plans to move the 26-year-old pass-rusher but hasn't clarified when it will extend him. Giving him a new deal before the regular-season opener against the Philadelphia Eagles on Sept. 4 at 8:20 p.m. ET (NBC, Peacock) seems wise. Dallas owner Jerry Jones, however, said that's not the team's deadline, nor does it need one. "No, not at all," Jones said Wednesday, via Jonah Javad of WFAA-TV in Dallas. "You don't have deadlines when you're playing under contract." Parsons is under contract, but that doesn't mean he must suit up. The EDGE could hold out of regular-season games, like former Cowboys star running back Emmitt Smith did in 1993. The Pro Football Hall of Famer missed the first two games of the season before becoming the league's highest-paid RB at that time. Parsons hasn't said whether he would hold out of regular-season games, but it's apparent he's unhappy with where things stand. "My mouth is closed," Parsons said Wednesday while leaving the practice field in Oxnard, California, via Field Level Media. Jones didn't say if talks with Parsons would resume when the Cowboys return to Texas for their second preseason game against the Baltimore Ravens. The matchup is scheduled for Saturday at 7 p.m. ET. The owner still seems confident Parsons will play on the fifth-year option if Dallas doesn't sign him before the start of the regular season. "Again, all you've got to go on are contracts," Jones said. "We are negotiating for a contract. When you do a contract, you would hope that after a negotiation, that's what both the team and player look to see what our obligations are. I have a lot of respect for the contract." Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott and wide receiver CeeDee Lamb played the last years of their rookie contracts. Perhaps Jones wants Parsons to do the same. Still, that would be silly. Paying the four-time Pro Bowler should be a no-brainer for the Cowboys, so they should stop wasting time and show him the money.

Taylor Swift went bonkers when Chiefs selected speedy WR in 2024
NFL

Taylor Swift went bonkers when Chiefs selected speedy WR in 2024

When Taylor Swift started dating Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce in 2023, she knew little about football. Now, the pop star is obsessed with the sport. She tracks who the Chiefs select in the NFL Draft. During her Wednesday debut on Kelce's podcast, "New Heights," Swift recalled going bonkers when Kansas City selected wide receiver Xavier Worthy with pick No. 28 in the 2024 draft. "Oh my god, I fell in love with [football]," Swift said. "I became obsessed with it. I became a person who was running through the halls of my house screaming, 'We drafted Xavier Worthy.' And my friends were like. 'Who's body snatched you? What do you mean we drafted Xavier Worthy?' I was screeching. I couldn't believe it." Kelce said Swift was the first person to tell him the Chiefs selected Worthy, who set a 40-yard dash record (4.21 seconds) at the 2024 NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis. "You were the first person to tell me that we drafted the fastest man in the draft," he said. "I couldn't believe it either. I was like, 'Is she right?' I'm gonna have to look this up. Did she get the wrong information here?' But, yeah, we traded up [from pick No. 32 with the Buffalo Bills]." Along with monitoring the Chiefs' drafts, Swift has learned more about the sport's various pass coverages and rules. The 14-time Grammy winner admitted she thought all offensive players played at the same time and didn't know what a first down was before she started dating Kelce. "We're talking about Cover 2, Cover 4, Cover 0, man coverage," she said. "I'm not ready to be an analyst right now, but give me 16 months." Perhaps one of the league's broadcast crews will let Swift make a brief appearance in the booth when she attends one of Kelce's games. Worthy, meanwhile, could continue to showcase why he made Swift ecstatic on draft night. In his rookie season, he had 59 receptions for 638 yards and six touchdown catches in 17 games. With the Chiefs expanding his role this season, he could be in for a more productive year.