Yardbarker
Yardbarker
x
20 facts you might not know about 'Transformers'
Paramount

20 facts you might not know about 'Transformers'

Transformers were popular toys among ‘80s and ‘90s kids, and it gave us a popular cartoon as well. In fact, an animated Transformers movie gave Orson Welles his last role. In the 2000s, Transformers hit the big screen, but live action this time. Well, with live-action people. They didn’t hire any actual Transformers. These 20 facts about Transformers are not robots in disguise. Trust us.

 
1 of 20

It started with an idea for a different Hasbro adaptation

It started with an idea for a different Hasbro adaptation
Paramount

In 2003, producer Don Murphy wanted to adapt G.I. Joe for a movie. Then, the United States went to war in Iraq. Hasbro suggested to Murphy that maybe he could adapt a different one of their toy lines: Transformers. Murphy agreed.

 
2 of 20

The first treatment was down to earth

The first treatment was down to earth
Paramount

Screenwriter Tom DeSanto joined the project to work with Murphy to come up with a treatment for the film. DeSanto brought in the idea of the story being told from a human point of view, while Murphy wanted something along the lines of a realistic disaster film. The duo also decided on the Creation Matrix being the McGuffin at the center of the story, but changed its name to the “Allspark” to avoid comparisons to The Matrix.

 
3 of 20

A big-time producer signed on

A big-time producer signed on
Paramount

Murphy and DeSanto found quite the guy to shepherd the product. That is none other than Steven Spielberg. Yes, Spielberg was brought on board as executive producer in 2004. He was a fan of the comics and of the toys and was happy to be working on the project in a producing capacity.

 
4 of 20

Spielberg pointed the story in the right direction

Spielberg pointed the story in the right direction
Paramount

John Rogers — who has a "story by" credit — wrote the first screenplay. His story focused on four Autobots fighting four Decepticons. This lost the human touch. Spielberg and company hired Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman to tackle the screenplay, and they were the screenwriters for the rest of the project. When they signed on, Spielberg told them that “a boy and his car” should be the focus on the film, and the duo hooked into that and went from there.

 
5 of 20

The Transformers were originally silent

The Transformers were originally silent
Paramount

Originally, the Transformers didn’t talk. This was the producers’ doing, as they thought talking robots would be silly. Orci and Kurtzman, though, thought even if talking robots would seem silly, they needed to talk like they did in the comics and the cartoons. Thus, we got talking Transformers.

 
6 of 20

The director originally turned it down

The director originally turned it down
Paramount

Spielberg went to Michael Bay and asked him to direct Transformers. Initially, he declined. Bay thought it would be a “stupid toy movie.” However, Spielberg’s sway helped, and then, after visiting Hasbro, Bay was down to direct the film.

 
7 of 20

Bay brought militarism back

Bay brought militarism back
Paramount

Bay may have been down to direct a “stupid toy movie,” but he was not cool directing a movie that was “too kiddie.” That’s what he felt about the screenplay for Transformers when he signed on. Bay set out to increase the military’s role in the movie, even though Transformers was originally a pivot from a G.I. Joe film. In turn, Orci and Kurtzman worked to try and keep the film from feeling like a military recruitment tool.

 
8 of 20

A classic voice actor got to return

A classic voice actor got to return
Paramount

These days, voiceover performances are often done by celebrities. Indeed, the original plan for Optimus Prime was apparently to have Liam Neeson play the part. However, Peter Cullen, who voiced Optimus Prime in the cartoon from the 1980s, auditioned. Bay liked his work enough to give him the role.

 
9 of 20

Another voice actor was nixed

Another voice actor was nixed
Paramount

Frank Welker, who voiced Megatron in the 1980s cartoon, also auditioned. Unlike Cullen, he wasn’t so lucky. Bay didn’t think his voice fit, so Hugo Weaving got the part. There is a happy ending, though. Weaving did not return for the sequels, and Welker was brought in for the part.

 
10 of 20

Bay changed some character names out of spite

Bay changed some character names out of spite
Paramount

Some existing Transformers characters like Megatron and Optimus Prime are in the film, but so are some new characters so that Hasbro could sell some new toys. However, some of their names leaked before the film came out. Bay was so annoyed by this he changed those character names before the film came out.

 
11 of 20

It was one actor’s last role in life

It was one actor’s last role in life
Paramount

Bernie Mac has a small, memorable role as used car salesman Bobby Bolivia. The actor would die soon thereafter. This was the last film Mac was in that came out while he was still alive. His last three releases were all posthumous.

 
12 of 20

The production returned to a couple famed spots to film

The production returned to a couple famed spots to film
Paramount

In addition to shooting on the Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico to served as a stand-in for Qatar, the film shot at the Hoover Dam and the Pentagon. Those latter two locations are notable, because Bay was the first director to shoot there after September 11.

 
13 of 20

Shia LaBeouf was thrown right into the fire

Shia LaBeouf was thrown right into the fire
Paramount

LaBeouf had to convince Bay that he could play a teenager, and he managed to do that. He may have regretted all that effort when he hit the set. On his first day, LaBeouf shot the scene where he’s chased by guard dogs. Though they were trained dogs, one dog didn’t listen to “cut” and kept chasing after the actor.

 
14 of 20

One actor earned his role

One actor earned his role
Paramount

Mark Ryan was originally an on-set stand-in for the Transformers. He would do voices and give the actors somebody to play off of. Bay apparently liked his work so much he decided to cast Ryan to voice Bumblebee.

 
15 of 20

Megan Fox got Linkin Park in the film

Megan Fox got Linkin Park in the film
Paramount

Fox was at a Linkin Park concert, and the band approached her afterward. They had heard about the Transformers movie and wanted a song in the film. Sure enough, “What I’ve Done” made the closing credits.

 
16 of 20

Bay directed some ads to promote the movie

Bay directed some ads to promote the movie
Paramount

Before he was a big-time filmmaker, Bay directed music videos and commercials like a lot of movie directors do. He actually directed the famous Aaron Burr ad for the “Got Milk?” campaign. To help promote Transformers, he directed tie-in ads for General Motors, Burger King, and Pepsi.

 
17 of 20

Bay gave himself a quick cameo

Bay gave himself a quick cameo
Paramount

Apparently Bay’s dog is in the film, and so is Bay himself. His appearance is brief, though. The director plays the person that Megatron flicks off into the distance.

 
18 of 20

It was a huge financial success

It was a huge financial success
Paramount

The accounting on Transformers is fuzzy, as there have been reports that it cost $150 million to make, but also reports it actually cost $200 million. Well, either way, the movie came up huge. It made $709.7 million worldwide. While it was “only” the fifth-highest-grossing film of the year, it was the highest-grossing non-sequel movie.

 
19 of 20

The movie got a few Oscar nominations

The movie got a few Oscar nominations
Paramount

Yes, they were for technical categories. The only actor to get a nomination of any kind for the film was Jon Voight, and that was for a Razzie. Transformers was nominated for Best Sound Editing, Best Sound Mixing, and Best Visual Effects. It didn’t win any of them.

 
20 of 20

There have been several sequels

There have been several sequels
Paramount

Transformers may have been the highest-grossing non-sequel of 2007, but it would have plenty of sequels eventually. In fact, Bay would direct for sequels himself, the last of which, The Last Knight, came out in 2017. In 2018, the series rebooted with Bumblebee, but Bay is no longer directing.

Chris Morgan

Chris Morgan is a Detroit-based culture writer who has somehow managed to justify getting his BA in Film Studies. He has written about sports and entertainment across various internet platforms for years and is also the author of three books about '90s television.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

TODAY'S BEST

New report suggests Christian Wilkins release related to 'incident' with teammate
NFL

New report suggests Christian Wilkins release related to 'incident' with teammate

There may be more to Christian Wilkins’ recent surprise release from the Las Vegas Raiders. NFL reporter Josina Anderson reported Saturday that "some sources believe an incident involving a teammate may have factored in-part into the Raiders' fatigue and release" of Wilkins. The nature of the incident is not clear. However, many believe the Raiders had a very good reason to move on from Wilkins considering the money they had invested in him. It also suggests the Raiders saw no alternative if they went straight to a release. Wilkins was dumped by the Raiders just one year into a four-year, $110 million deal. The Raiders suggested Wilkins failed to take rehab seriously as he tries to work his way back from a foot injury. Other teams do not appear to have the same concerns about Wilkins as the Raiders did, and he should find a new landing spot fairly easily. That is one of the reasons some suspect there is more to the Raiders’ decision than they are publicly saying.

All signs point to Yankees moving on from Anthony Volpe
MLB

All signs point to Yankees moving on from Anthony Volpe

With the trade for Ryan McMahon now complete, it would seem New York Yankees’ general manager Brian Cashman has fulfilled one of his three priorities. He can now cross third base off the list, which leaves the rotation and bullpen as his remaining priorities. However, according to one Yankees writer, Cashman might not be done with the infield. Chris Kirschner of The Athletic reported this after the McMahon trade: “The Yankees may not be done adding to their infield. A team source said the Yankees are interested in adding a right-handed hitter who could play the infield.” Kirschner adds that the Yankees have had interest in Willi Castro and Amed Rosario. But the question now is, how would another player fit in the Yankees’ infield? Needless to say, Paul Goldschmidt and Jazz Chisholm Jr. aren’t going anywhere, and McMahon is just getting there. That leaves the low-hanging fruit. Anthony Volpe has been at the center of controversy all this season. His 13 errors, many of which had come at make-or-break moments, amount to the second-highest total in the game. In addition, his bat has not been able to compensate, hitting .214/.286/.407 with 14 home runs. There was always a lot to like about Volpe. He won a Gold Glove in his rookie year, his power has always been promising and his speed is nothing to scoff at. Unfortunately, his glove has become a liability and his speed has also produced very few results. Volpe has swiped just 10 bags in 17 attempts. His power is the one thing that still has some upside, but it hasn’t been enough to justify a spot in the lineup. Both Castro and Rosario have been far more productive at the plate this season than Volpe. Kirschner doesn’t clarify how serious the Yankees are in their pursuit of another infielder, but that most likely isn’t available information. Having just turned 24, Volpe could still become the type of player that was expected from him as a top prospect. However, his recent performance has weighed heavily on his team’s efforts and it may be buying him a ticket out of the Bronx — or at least a spot on the bench.

Chicago Sky Announce Angel Reese Update for Indiana Fever Game
WNBA

Chicago Sky Announce Angel Reese Update for Indiana Fever Game

Chicago Sky forward Angel Reese missed Thursday night's game against the Seattle Storm due to a back injury. It was the second blowout loss in as many games for the Sky, who now sit at 7-17 on the WNBA season, five losses back of a postseason spot. The injury to Reese is a concerning development for a Sky team with little to no margin for error right now. An All-Star for the second straight season, Reese has averaged 13.8 points and 12.5 rebounds in 22 games for Chicago in 2025. As they eye a date with the Indiana Fever on Sunday, the Sky have announced an official Reese update. Seen going through individual drills on Saturday, Reese was on the court seemingly testing out her back ahead of Sunday's afternoon affair in Chicago. Following her morning work, Reese was officially listed as questionable on the injury report. Reese is joined on the injury report by several of her teammates, including rookie guard Hailey Van Lith who was a surprise addition with an ankle injury. As it pertains to Reese, this update should not come as much of a surprise. While she was eventually ruled out against Seattle, she did start the day questionable, which is the same approach Chicago is taking on its latest injury report. That said, Reese not being ruled out a day in advance is good news. It indicates she has a chance to play, which also suggests the injury is not too serious — aligning with comments made by head coach Tyler Marsh who has been reiterating Reese is day-to-day with this back injury. With Caitlin Clark expected to miss this game with a groin injury, the contest could be without both she and Reese.

'In what world does this make sense?’: Oilers and $63M forward
NHL

'In what world does this make sense?’: Oilers and $63M forward

According to some, throw out the idea that the Edmonton Oilers should pursue Max Pacioretty. A veteran forward who has earned over $63 million over the course of his NHL career has yet to sign an NHL contract and was recently mentioned in a post by David Staples as a possible fit. In a recent post, the Journal noted, “All of the top NHL unrestricted free agents have already signed contracts, but there’s one big name player still available that makes good sense for the Edmonton Oilers to pursue.” Responses have been varied, with a few quite vocal about the Oilers not following Staples’ advice. “In what world does this make sense?????” writes a commenter on a recent post for The Hockey Writers. Another commenter wrote, “Pacioretty is a good journeyman player but he is injury prone now, late in his career. Oilers might be lucky to get 40 games out of him. They should look elsewhere instead of taking a chance on Patches.” Tyler Yaremchuk of Oilers Nation chimed in and said, “He scored five goals in 37 games last year with the Toronto Maple Leafs. Can’t stay healthy, very old, very slow.” Yaremchuk then went on a rant, listing several Oilers forwards who would be better than Pacioretty. What About Pacioretty on a PTO? Is there any reason that a team that is looking to get younger and faster, and move out depth pieces that were older and less productive than expected, would revert back to last summer’s strategy? It seems like an odd choice on the surface. Something would have to happen that would make giving Pacioretty a look risk-free. That means only a PTO. Even at that point, should he agree, it would require him to be willing to sign a two-way contract for the league minimum.