Yardbarker
x
Chris Bassitt makes argument against salary cap in baseball
Chris Bassitt. Kevin Sousa-Imagn Images

Chris Bassitt makes argument against salary cap in baseball

It's been a long week for the MLBPA. 

Executive Director Tony Clark resigned amid a scandal, just months before an expected labor dispute largely centered around a potential salary cap in MLB.

Amid that disruption to the MLBPA, the messaging hasn't changed ahead of the looming labor dispute. There is no interest from the players in a salary cap, and they don't believe it would fix what some see as parity issues within baseball.

Recently, Toronto Blue Jays pitcher Chris Bassitt spoke about the possibility of a salary cap. Bassitt is an MLBPA executive subcommittee member.

“The salary cap doesn’t fix anything," Bassitt said. "If you look at every major sport with a salary cap, we have the best parity. The salary cap is not the issue. Having suppressed salaries across the league so owners make more money is not the answer. If I would tell you in 25 years, the Dodgers would be going to 10 World Series and winning seven of them, is that an issue? Because that’s the Patriots. The Chiefs have been to what, six or seven? The Philadelphia Eagles have been to four or five. The parity in our sport is better than any other sport."

Does MLB have better parity than other sports?

The key to Bassitt's argument, and that of many other opponents of a salary cap, is the idea that parity is actually better in baseball than in the other major sports.

On the surface, that might be hard to believe given the spending spree that the Los Angeles Dodgers have been on that has resulted in back-to-back World Series wins. However, based on championship success, there's some merit there. 

Since 2011, or over the last 15 World Series, there have been 10 different World Series winners. Four different winners have multiple World Series wins in that time. In the last 15 seasons, the NFL has had nine different champions, the NBA has had 11, and the NHL has had 10. That puts MLB somewhere in the middle for parity at the championship level.

The problem becomes the bottom half of MLB consisting of the teams that either can't or refuse to pay to acquire and/or retain stars. The group that has effectively no chance on Opening Day. There are 13 teams with a 1.0 percent or less chance to win the World Series as spring training begins. That includes six teams at 0.1 percent or less, per Fangraphs. So, while there is at least some parity at the top, there isn't at the bottom.

"We will make changes to try to help the so-called bottom teams out," Bassitt said. "But a salary cap and suppressing salaries and taking from players to try to help the so-called bottom teams spend more? That’s not the answer. Because if you’re trying to make a competitive league across the board, we have proof that every single league [has] less parity than ours. So how can you sit there and say a salary cap is going to fix this when every single salary cap sport has less parity than ours? It makes no sense. Again, the root of the answer is not the salary cap, and the root of why owners want a salary cap is not for competitive balance.”

As it stands, MLB looks like it's headed for an ugly labor dispute. The potential salary cap and how it relates to parity in the sport are central to that. 

Daniel Morrison

Dan Morrison is a writer originally from Massachusetts, now residing in Florida. He spent four years at On3, working on the National News Desk there. Prior to that, he’s also contributed at Underdog Dynasty.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!