Yardbarker
Yardbarker
x
Every AL Cy Young winner since 2000
Erik Williams-USA TODAY Sports

Every AL Cy Young winner since 2000

Cy Young pitched in a rather different era of baseball. However, he remains a famous name thanks to the Cy Young Award. Each year, the American League and National League hand out an award for the best pitcher that season, or at least that is the goal. As the years have gone on, the criteria voters use for the Cy Young have changed. We can chronicle those changes as we catalog every American League Cy Young winner since 2000.

 
1 of 23

Pedro Martinez

Pedro Martinez
Rich Pilling/MLB via Getty Images

If we had started a year earlier, we also would have started with Pedro, who won the NL Cy Young with the Expos in 1997. By 2000, he was with the Red Sox and putting up incredible numbers. While his record fell from 23-4 in 1999 to 18-6 (at a time when 20 wins was a “magic” number to some pundits), Pedro dropped his ERA from a great 2.07 to an unheard-of 1.74. While Martinez would lead MLB in ERA twice more, this was his last Cy Young.

 
2 of 23

Roger Clemens

Roger Clemens
Focus on Sport/Getty Images

Clemens had plenty of hardware by 2001, and now he was pitching with the Yankees. Both of those things likely helped him win his sixth Cy Young. Also, the fact win-loss record still meant a lot to many voters. Clemens went 20-3, but with a 3.51 ERA. Even so, the 38-year-old got to add another Cy Young to his collection.

 
3 of 23

Barry Zito

Barry Zito
Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images

Zito had a reputation for being an oddball, but he also would take the ball and go out there time and time again. Three times in his career, Zito led MLB in games started. Sure, it’s not the most impressive stat, but it’s something. Yes, Zito’s 23 wins with the Athletics helped, but his 2.75 ERA is belied by a 3.87 FIP. Of course, in 2002, voters weren’t paying attention to FIP.

 
4 of 23

Roy Halladay

Roy Halladay
Al Bello/Getty Images

Famously, “Doc” Halladay struggled early in his career. In 2000, he posted a 10.64 ERA with the Blue Jays. He went down to the minors to completely retool his approach. In 2002, Halladay made his first All-Star Game, and then in 2003, he won a Cy Young for the Blue Jays. He was bolstered by leading MLB with 266 innings pitched and a whopping nine complete games. Halladay was en route to the Hall of Fame, though sadly, he wouldn’t live to see it. In 2017, Halladay died in a plane crash, leading to his posthumous induction.

 
5 of 23

Johan Santana

Johan Santana
Al Bello/Getty Images

The offensive environment was elevated in 2004 (whatever could have led to that?), so Santana’s 2.61 ERA led the American League, as did his 2.92 FIP. Additionally, the Twins starter racked up 265 strikeouts to lead the AL as well, making Santana an obvious choice for the Cy Young.

 
6 of 23

Bartolo Colon

Bartolo Colon
G. N. Lowrance/Getty Images

These days, Colon is best remembered for pitching 21 years in MLB, sticking around until he was 45. He was a solid pitcher, sure, but his 2005 Cy Young win is perhaps the last of the “Wins!” victories. Colon had a 3.48 FIP and struck out a mere 6.3 batters per nine innings. The only stat he led the American League in was wins (21). Meanwhile, Santana was out there leading the AL in strikeouts and WHIP with a 2.87 ERA. However, he only had 16 wins, so…

 
7 of 23

Johan Santana

Johan Santana
Ron LeBlanc/WireImage

Hey, at least in 2006, Santana got his second Cy Young (even if it should have been his third). He was undeniable this year, as he led not just the AL but MLB in ERA, strikeouts, FIP, WHIP, and more. Santana did all that while making 34 starts. Owing to a relatively short career and a lack of the counting stats Hall voters have long loved (including wins), Santana fell off the Hall ballot after one year, leaving him in the Hall of Very Good.

 
8 of 23

CC Sabathia

CC Sabathia
Elsa/Getty Images

Well, Sabathia led the majors in innings pitched in 2007, so there’s that. His 3.21 ERA and 3.14 FIP were also quite good, if not remarkable. John Lackey led the AL in ERA at 3.01, and Josh Beckett hit the 20-win mark, but all in all, Sabathia managed to win his one Cy Young. That, combined with 250 wins being the new 300 to a certain kind of voter, may get Sabathia into the Hall of Fame.

 
9 of 23

Cliff Lee

Cliff Lee
Nick Laham/Getty Images

Cleveland got itself back-to-back Cy winners in Sabathia and Lee. Lee’s win was a bit clearer cut, though. Yes, he had a 22-3 record, but he also led the American League with a 2.54 ERA and 2.83 FIP. Also, Lee’s elite command led to him walking a mere 1.4 batters per nine innings. If you are below two on that front, you’ve really done something special.

 
10 of 23

Zack Greinke

Zack Greinke
Bruce Kluckhohn/Getty Images

Greinke was unremarkable to start his career, though he was also dealing with anxiety. The dude always loved to pitch, though, obviously, given that he hit the 20-year mark in MLB. He would have some big years with other teams and become a Gold Glove guy, which helps his Hall resume. Greinke won his one Cy with the Royals, bolstered by a 2.16 ERA, a significant number in 2009.

 
11 of 23

Felix Hernandez

Felix Hernandez
Ron Vesely/MLB Photos via Getty Images

In 2010, the “Wins!” voters saw their era die for good. Hernandez led the AL with 249.2 innings and led the majors with a 2.27 ERA. However, a lack of run support from the Mariners led to him posting a 13-12 record. Back in the day, that would have meant “King Felix” had no chance of winning the Cy Young. By this point, thorough thinkers were earning voting opportunities. Hernandez won the Cy Young comfortably, even beating Sabathia and his 21 wins.

 
12 of 23

Justin Verlander

Justin Verlander
Focus on Sport/Getty Images

Verlander had won Rookie of the Year with the Tigers in 2006. By 2011, he was one of the best pitchers in baseball. Verlander won the “Pitching Triple Crown” by leading the AL in wins, ERA, and strikeouts. This led to him winning the Cy Young and becoming the first pitcher since Clemens in 1986 to win the AL Cy Young and the AL MVP in the same season.

 
13 of 23

David Price

David Price
Jamie Squire/Getty Images

Price, like Verlander, was a No. 1 overall pick. They would become teammates in Detroit (briefly), but not until after Price won his sole Cy Young. He had 20 wins, sure, but he also led the American League with a 2.56 ERA, and getting over the 200-strikeout mark likely helped.

 
14 of 23

Max Scherzer

Max Scherzer
Christopher Pasatieri/Getty Images

Scherzer was a teammate of Verlander’s when he won a Cy Young. His 21-3 record likely helped with some voters, and his 2.90 ERA, while good, did not lead the American League. His WHIP was the lowest in the AL, at least. Scherzer wasn’t an obvious winner, but he was as good of a choice as anybody. Given his future track record, it feels like a good call in hindsight.

 
15 of 23

Corey Kluber

Corey Kluber
Hannah Foslien/Getty Images

There was a five-year stretch where Kluber was arguably the best pitcher in the American League, and it started with his Cy Young win in 2014. Making 34 starts with Cleveland, Kluber’s 2.44 ERA did not lead the American League, but his 2.35 FIP did. By this point, that meant something to a lot of voters. It also didn’t hurt that he struck out 10.3 batters per nine innings.

 
16 of 23

Dallas Keuchel

Dallas Keuchel
Jamie Squire/Getty Images

Keuchel is probably the first “Wait, he won a Cy Young?” guy on this list. Maybe it’s because he really fell off in his thirties, part of why he has a career 4.02 ERA and 4.00 FIP. That feels right. Keuchel is a decent pitcher, but he was considered Cy-worthy for one season. Pitching for Houston, he led the AL in innings pitched and, yes, had 20 wins. All that said, he led the AL pitchers in bWAR, so Keuchel was a good call. He also won his second of five Gold Gloves, which hopefully didn’t factor in here.

 
17 of 23

Rick Porcello

Rick Porcello
Billie Weiss/Boston Red Sox/Getty Images

Okay, Porcello is the strangest winner on this list, to be sure. He never made an All-Star Game in his career, including when he won the Cy Young! In 2016, though, Porcello had a 22-4 record for the Boston Red Sox. He had a 3.15 ERA, the lowest of his career. Notably, Verlander had more first-place votes, but Porcello eked out a close win. Verlander and Kluber had better seasons, but somehow, Porcello got the win.

 
18 of 23

Corey Kluber

Corey Kluber
Kamil Krzaczynski/USA TODAY Sports

Speaking of Kluber! This was the fourth season in his dominant five-year stretch. Once again pitching for Cleveland, Kluber had the best season of his career. He led MLB in ERA and WHIP and picked up three complete-game shutouts. Having fallen off, Kluber will likely end up in the Hall of Very Good.

 
19 of 23

Blake Snell

Blake Snell
Kim Klement/USA TODAY Sports

It looked like Snell’s 2018 campaign would be an outlier. He had 21 wins for Tampa, but he also had a 1.89 ERA to lead the American League. Snell was a fine pick for the Cy Young. He had a couple more years in Tampa before moving to San Diego. It took him some time to get going, but in 2023, he led MLB in ERA, a reminder of what he can do when he puts it all together.

 
20 of 23

Justin Verlander

Justin Verlander
Troy Taormina/USA TODAY Sports

By 2019, Verlander had left Detroit for Houston to try and win a World Series (it worked out, by the way). He finished second in the Cy Young vote his first full season with the Astros, but the next year, he went ahead and won it. Verlander led MLB in games and innings pitched, plus wins, but also in WHIP. His 2.58 ERA was also quite good.

 
21 of 23

Shane Bieber

Shane Bieber
Raj Mehta/USA TODAY Sports

This was the COVID-19 season, and some of the awards look a little weird in hindsight (shout out to Kyle Lewis, AL Rookie of the Year). Bieber’s Cy Young win for Cleveland stands the test of time. He managed to post a 1.63 ERA and 2.07 FIP, both of which led MLB. Bieber also struck out a whopping 14.2 batters per nine innings.

 
22 of 23

Robbie Ray

Robbie Ray
Bruce Kluckhohn/USA TODAY Sports

Ray was long a guy who struck out a lot of batters. However, he also earned a reputation for being homer-prone, and his strikeout rates would be paired with lackluster ERAs. In 2021, Ray put it all together for the Blue Jays. He led the AL in innings pitched and struck out 11.5 batters per nine innings, but at the same time, he led the AL in ERA and WHIP. By the next season, he was with Seattle, and his ERA was back up to 3.71.

 
23 of 23

Justin Verlander

Justin Verlander
Bill Streicher/USA TODAY Sports

Verlander had effectively missed all of 2020 and 2021 with an arm injury. When 2022 started, he was in his age-39 season. He already had punched his ticket to the Hall of Fame. Why keep going? Well, because apparently, he was still an elite pitcher. Verlander led MLB with a 1.75 ERA in 28 starts, and he led MLB in WHIP as well. He even won another World Series ring. A Hall of Famer leveled up to being the best pitcher of his generation.

Chris Morgan

Chris Morgan is a Detroit-based culture writer who has somehow managed to justify getting his BA in Film Studies. He has written about sports and entertainment across various internet platforms for years and is also the author of three books about '90s television.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

TODAY'S BEST

Rafael Devers had telling comment about playing first base
MLB

Rafael Devers had telling comment about playing first base

Rafael Devers played first base for the San Francisco Giants for the first time on Tuesday, and his quote about playing the field likely will not sit well with Boston Red Sox fans. Devers said after Tuesday’s game that he prefers playing in the field as opposed to serving as a designated hitter. “It keeps me active. It keeps my head out of just thinking about the next at-bat,” Devers said, via Shayna Rubin of the San Francisco Chronicle. “I’d rather be on the field than in the cage hitting all the time and thinking about the next at-bat.” Devers, of course, refused to play first base for the Red Sox after they asked him to. He felt disrespected after they moved him off third base to accommodate Alex Bregman, and thought the team went back on its word by later asking him to play first. To Red Sox fans, if Devers is at his best playing in the field and playing first would have helped the team, it will be baffling why he did not just do it when that would have seemingly been a preferable outcome for all involved. Devers went 2-for-5 in Tuesday’s 9-0 win over the Atlanta Braves, driving in a run in his first appearance at first base. It remains unclear how frequently the Giants plan to use him at the position, but the team might take note of these comments.

Five reasons the NHL's new 84-game schedule is a bad idea
NHL

Five reasons the NHL's new 84-game schedule is a bad idea

“The NHL schedule is just too short!” said no one ever. In early July, the NHL and NHL Players’ Association ratified a four-year extension to their collective bargaining agreement through September 2030. The deal was rightfully praised as a win for the sport. After decades of bad blood and the lingering threat of labor stoppages, an extension — that kicks in for the 2026-27 season — arriving more than a year early speaks volumes on the health of the players’ relationship with the league. Amid the good vibes, it was easy to discount one small change with potentially significant consequences: an increase from 82 to 84 games in the NHL’s regular season. We’re diving into the league’s new schedule and considering the unforeseen impact of adding more games to a packed calendar. Here are five key reasons this subtle shift is an ill-timed cash grab by hockey’s power brokers. History of the schedule Before we get into the future schedule, it’s important to understand the league’s past. The visual below shows the maximum number of combined games a team has potentially been able to play across the regular season and postseason since expansion. Forcing more games out of the talent is far from a new idea. With the exception of abbreviated lockout and pandemic calendars — excluded above — the NHL’s schedule length had been the same since the mid-1990s. Teams currently play 82 regular-season games, while the Stanley Cup finalists can play another 28 if their four best-of-seven series go the maximum. That’s 110. The league briefly dabbled with an 84-game season schedule in 1992-93 and 1993-94 where teams played a pair of neutral-site games to serve as feelers for future expansion. It didn’t stick. For 30 years, everyone seemed to agree — the season was long enough. 82 games wedged into six-plus months and four grueling playoff rounds was plenty. Plus preseason games, All-Star weekends, and international events. Every cent had been squeezed, every sweat drop had been left on the ice. Until now… ✅ Arguments for Change Prior to picking apart the new 84-game version, the reasons supporting the additional games deserve their day in court. And there are reasons, sort of. It balances the schedule. 84 games ensures each team plays its division rivals exactly four times. Argument against: Ah, competitive balance. It’s a nice idea. But let’s be serious. If anyone had the slightest interest in fairness, the current playoff format would be scrapped. The NHL’s division-based bracket often features first-round series between elite teams. The format doesn’t reseed either, leading to easier postseason paths for weaker teams. We can’t pretend a balanced schedule matters. The preseason has been reduced by two games. You may be screaming that this is all noise as the new CBA has offset the preseason by two games — a net-zero change in game count. Argument against: Established veterans mostly sit out the exhibition calendar anyway, reluctantly drawing in for two or three low-intensity games to appease fans and shake off rust. Two intra-division games tacked onto the schedule don’t offset meaningless autumn skates that top players mostly watch from home. There is money to be made. Money is the only (real) reason for adding to the schedule. Two extra divisional matches sell more tickets, TV ads and draft beer. The owners and players share equally in any new hockey-related revenue. Argument against: Sure, 84 regular-season games generates more dollars than 82 games. So would 86 games. Or 100 games. A postseason play-in round would create “must-watch” games too. But where does this line of thinking end? Everyone signed off on the change. While we’re not privy to the details on whether scheduling was a contentious issue, both the NHL and NHLPA bilaterally agreed from negotiations. Argument against: The NFL added one game in 2021 to create a 17-game schedule. Many players still hate it. There’s now buzz of an 18th game. While money talks, sometimes leadership needs to save the players from themselves. ❌ Why 84 games is a bad idea The new CBA had its chance to prove to us more games is good for hockey. It hasn’t. Let’s get down to why this money-driven move shouldn’t have gone forward. 1. Players are finally getting healthier. While missed games aren’t a perfect measure to weigh frequency and severity of injury, it’s a reasonable proxy for player health. Enter NHL Injury Viz, which houses 25 years of player injury and illness data. I’ve normalized games missed by season for schedule length and team count over the past quarter-century, and the results are fascinating. From the visual, we can see that games missed have now dropped below pre-pandemic levels. Given the data counts injuries and illnesses that players actually miss games from, we can’t say that every single physical issue is factored. But we can conclude that in 2024-25, NHL players missed the fewest relative number of games in at least 23 years. In a league where players missing “only” 6,641 games is a positive trend, cramming in a few more tough matchups to juice a percentage point of revenue feels wrong. 2. We are wearing out our biggest superstars. No one is going to cry for Connor McDavid. He’s 28 years old and has earned just shy of $100 million in his 10-year career before endorsements. His next deal could push him near $20 million per season given the rising salary cap. Two more games shouldn’t wreck a finely tuned athlete. But consider his last two years. On top of the preseason schedule, McDavid faced 164 regular-season games (missed 21 due to injury), the midseason 4 Nations Face-off (scored the winning goal), plus two All-Star weekends (designed and won the 2025 skills event). He’s also played an additional 53 games of nasty postseason hockey with fewer than 90 days off each summer. That’s more than 230 game days in 21 months. While international best-on-best hockey is great for all of us, McDavid will fly to Italy and back for another six Olympic contests in February 2026. This compresses the NHL season further, resulting in 13 back-to-back outings for the Oilers, who have a famously exhausting travel schedule. With international play now slated as part of the league’s bi-annual calendar, do we need to drain the top guys further? 3. Load management is inevitable — if it hasn’t already started. Hockey fans famously chirp their basketball-loving pals about NBA talent skipping games. Hockey players would never sit out to rest. Well, we might test that theory soon. Every sport has a tipping point. In an NHL where 10 of 16 playoff teams can usually sleepwalk to the postseason, someone is going to implement the obvious benefit of load management. It may have crept in late last season… McDavid missed eight games in April with a lower-body injury. With a playoff spot secured, he was not rushed back, coasting to his 100th point in the season finale against the lowly San Jose Sharks. Leon Draisaitl, with the Rocket Richard Trophy locked, missed Edmonton’s final seven games with an undisclosed injury. He was fit enough to play the Oilers’ first playoff game, logging two points in 22:02. After leading NHL forwards in average ice time (22:47), reigning MVP Nathan MacKinnon sat the final three games with an undisclosed injury. It may have cost him the scoring title — he lost by five points to Nikita Kucherov — but ensured MacKinnon was well-rested for the postseason. While these might not be random Tuesdays in January, three of the league’s biggest stars may have quietly started a trend last spring. They were good with recovering slowly for the greater good. Goaltenders are already ahead of the curve to maximize performance — only five started 60 games last year. Will these two extra games, combined with a recurring international slate, finally push sport science in hockey to its inevitable conclusion? 4. The NHL product will get watered down. Logically, the longer the season, the less important each game becomes. The new CBA is effectively telling us that by adding to the calendar. It’s not good for entertainment purposes. Here’s why: Even if players don’t sit out, there is another consequence … they just don’t play as hard (gasp). Again, it’s two games. But we all know that feeling when you see your favorite team play the first minute of its first April playoff game. The elevated speed and physicality on that opening dump in where you lean toward the TV and nod at your buddy? This is what we give up with more games. Like you or I, athletes only have so much to give in a week, a month or a year. With ongoing talk of further expansion, more teams spread out talent. More games spread out intensity, further diluting the product. 5. The cap is already rising significantly. In the last decade, when the salary cap rose modestly — or not at all during the pandemic years — adding games to the schedule was a defendable lever to pull. Wealthy owners and athletes or not, things were ugly in the not-too-distant past. When would fans return to arenas? How much escrow were the players facing? Would league economics ever get back on track? While many dollars were lost from COVID, the rising salary cap tells a story of a league confident in economic resurgence. The cap ceiling is set to rise 29% from this past season by 2027-28. We saw the first signs of player compensation boosts in July as teams and player agents stickhandled their new reality. While free agents always get paid, they were paid this offseason given the generous cap space. Adding to the schedule as the cap quickly climbs feels like missing the forest through the trees. Conclusion: Adding two games to the calendar may not bring mass injuries, load management and a tired product overnight. But tipping points are difficult to identify in the moment. The new schedule also messes with recordkeeping and milestones, among other statistical issues. Much-needed labor peace is a win for anyone in hockey, yet even the biggest superfan would have to admit the season runs excessively long. At best, the NHL and NHLPA have taken a shortsighted risk. At worst, it could deliver a host of negative, unintended consequences.

Brewers' Jacob Misiorowski continues to set radar gun on fire at unprecedented rate
MLB

Brewers' Jacob Misiorowski continues to set radar gun on fire at unprecedented rate

Milwaukee Brewers Jacob Misiorowski was back on the mound on Tuesday night against the Seattle Mariners, and even though he pitched just 3.2 innings, he continued to show why he is one of baseball's most exciting young talents. Prior to be pulled after 64 pitches, he allowed just three hits, walked one and struck out seven to continue his stunning start to his big league career. He also continued to light up the radar gun in a way that no other pitcher in the modern era has. Following Tuesday's start, where he regularly clocked in at over 101 mph, he has now thrown 39 pitches this season that have eclipsed 101 mph on the radar gun. He has done that in just 29.1 innings over six starts. By comparison, every other starting pitcher in Major League Baseball has tallied just 17 pitches of 101 mph or higher — combined. But it's not just about how he stacks up with pitchers this season that is staggering. It's that he is near the top of the list for 101 mph pitches for a career. Here are two of his 101 mph heaters from Tuesday. The ball just erupts out of his hand at the hitters. When you add in his mid-90s change-up and high-90s breaking pitches he is already one of the nastiest pitchers in the majors. It is that sort of electric stuff that made him a National League All-Star after just five appearances. For the season, he has now struck out 40 batters in 29.1 innings of work (that is 12.27 per nine innings), allowed only 15 hits and just eight earned runs. And five of those earned runs against came in only one start. Given his age and with the way teams today are extremely protective of their pitchers, he is probably going to see his pitch counts and innings closely monitored this season. When he is on the mound, though, he is quickly becoming appointment viewing.

Commanders' Jayden Daniels discusses Terry McLaurin's holdout amid contract dispute
NFL

Commanders' Jayden Daniels discusses Terry McLaurin's holdout amid contract dispute

Washington Commanders wide receiver Terry McLaurin reportedly wants "to bring a deal together" with his current employer regarding a contract extension. Still, he nevertheless elected to stay away from the team during the start of training camp practices this week. While speaking with reporters on Wednesday, Washington quarterback Jayden Daniels was understandably asked about McLaurin's absence. "I would talk to Terry like if he was here, just checking up on him, at the end of the day, that's just a relationship that we have on and off the field," Daniels said, Newsweek's Justin Grasso shared. "This is just business in the NFL. You know, we know Terry's working. We don't really have to worry about him doing any of that, but at the end of the day, he's still one of our brothers." After the Commanders made Daniels the second overall pick of the 2024 NFL Draft, McLaurin became the favorite target of the signal-caller, who ultimately earned Offensive Rookie of the Year Award honors. According to ESPN stats, McLaurin finished the 2024 season with team highs of 82 receptions, 117 targets and 1,096 receiving yards. He was also second in the entire league with 13 touchdown catches. Per ESPN's John Keim, Commanders head coach Dan Quinn insisted on Wednesday that the McLaurin situation is simply "part of the business of our league." McLaurin is in the final year of his current contract, and NFL reporter Henry McKenna of Fox Sports suggested earlier in the week that the 29-year-old could "be interested in working out something similar" to the five-year, $150M deal that the Pittsburgh Steelers handed wide receiver DK Metcalf in March. "It helps out a lot [we worked together last year]," Daniels added about McLaurin. "If this was last year, probably different because we didn't know each other. Now, we have a whole year under our belt, and just the relationship we built on and off the field. We don't really have egos when it comes to our relationship with each other, so it's going to be seamless. I know Terry's working, though. ...Whenever the time comes and he's back out on the field, I don't think we'll miss a beat." As of Wednesday afternoon, DraftKings Sportsbook had the Commanders team, which lost this year's NFC Championship Game, sixth among the betting favorites at +1800 odds to win Super Bowl LX. Such information suggests that now may not be the best time for Washington to be stingy, regardless of McLaurin's contract requests.