Bengals' Interest in Re-Signing Joe Flacco Revealed

Originally posted on Athlon Sports
By Christian Alamodin | Last updated Feb 10, 2026 7:11 AM ET

The Cincinnati Bengals want to return to their 2021 form, when they made a Cinderella run to Super Bowl LVI. However, they know more than anyone that it takes a lot to get to the big game.

One of the biggest roadblocks the face is the quality of their QB play if Joe Burrow gets injured. Joe Flacco's arrival from the Cleveland Browns shored up the team's offense, though he wasn't able to save the season as the Zac Taylor-led team finished the year with a 6-11 record.

As the team prepares for the offseason, the Bengals must address who should serve as Burrow's backup. A recent report suggests that they plan to keep the former Super Bowl MVP in Bengals colors.

Former Cleveland Browns quarterback Joe Flacco (15) and Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow (9) shake hands after a game.© Ken Blaze-Imagn Images

The Bengals Want to Keep Joe Flacco Despite Interest From Other Teams

ESPN's Jeremy Fowler reported that the Bengals are interested in keeping the one-time Pro Bowler in Cincinnati and will be making an offer in the coming days.

"They believe he's a valuable backup who can be a viable starting option if Joe Burrow gets injured again," Fowler shared.

However, Fowler also noted that Flacco is attracting attention from elsewhere, with the Minnesota Vikings and the Pittsburgh Steelers reportedly interested in acquiring the veteran QB's services.

"Flacco will have options, possibly as a bridge quarterback elsewhere. The Vikings considered signing Flacco last offseason. And the Steelers will have an opening if Aaron Rodgers doesn't re-sign there. Pittsburgh liked his free agency profile last offseason, too," Fowler added.

Flacco had a solid year under center for the Bengals in 2025. He made nine appearances for Cincinnati, throwing for 1,664 yards and 13 touchdowns on a 61.7% completion rate.

This article first appeared on Athlon Sports and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads: