x
Golden Knights aim to bully Utah again in Game 2
Stephen R. Sylvanie-Imagn Images

The Golden Knights won Game 1 by dragging the series into the kind of hockey they believe they can own.

It was heavy, crowded and mean in the right places. It asked for depth, patience and pushback. Vegas answered all of it, then finished the game the way it has finished so many lately.

Now the question for Game 2 is simple. Can the Golden Knights get there first, and stay there longer?

Heavy on purpose

Game 1 was physical because Vegas wanted it that way. The Knights finished with 52 hits, and the tone started early with bodies on pucks, bodies on defensemen and no clean night for Utah’s skill.

“I think that’s the message any team would want,” head coach John Tortorella said Monday ahead of Game 2. “Be physical with the opponent, see what the distance they’re willing to go.”

That matters because this is more than a style choice. It is Vegas trying to decide what kind of series this becomes.

Keegan Kolesar said Monday that the approach is sustainable, and that sounds like the clearest signal of all. The Knights do not want one loud night. They want a long series played in their kind of traffic.

The series is really about control

That is the sharper point under everything else. Vegas is not just trying to out-hit Utah. It is trying to control the conditions of the series.

When the Knights are at their best, they are not chasing highlight hockey. They are taking away time, leaning on people, winning draws, getting to the interior and making the other team work through layers.

Game 1 was not perfect, but it tilted that way by the third. Vegas won 55.2 percent of the faceoffs, scored on its only power play and killed Utah’s only chance. That is not just execution. That is control.

It is also why the fourth line mattered so much. Colton Sissons tied the game, Nic Dowd scored the winner, and that group helped pull the night back into Vegas’ shape.

Third-period belief is real, but risky

The Golden Knights have made a habit of finishing games late, and they did it again Sunday. They stayed with the game after Utah scored late in the first, stayed with it again after the fluky second goal, then turned the third period into theirs.

Tortorella pointed to that response when he spoke Monday at City National Arena. He said the Knights just kept plugging away until they found the goals they needed.

Brayden McNabb put it more plainly. “We’ve been resilient all year,” he said Monday ahead of Game 2. “The belief that we’re never out of a game.”

That confidence is valuable. It is also something Vegas would rather not keep testing.

Tortorella made that point too. Chasing games may have become part of the team’s identity, but it is not a playoff recipe you want to lean on night after night.

Where Game 2 can still turn

Utah did enough in Game 1 to make clear this is not a soft matchup. The Mammoth generated 33 shots, got one clean finish from Logan Cooley and one fluky bounce from Kevin Stenlund, and found enough speed through the neutral zone to create problems.

Vegas knows that part of the night cannot be ignored. Kolesar said Monday the neutral zone is one area that can help the Knights spend more time in the O-zone. McNabb said the gaps can be better too, especially against a team that looks for late support off the rush.

Those are the details that can decide whether Game 2 feels tighter or looser than the opener. The Knights do not need a different game plan. They need fewer openings.

Hart and the middle of the ice

Carter Hart was one of the clearest reasons Vegas got out of Game 1 in front.

He stopped 31 of 33 shots and settled things down when Utah had its best stretches. Tortorella said Monday that Hart gave the Knights a chance, and that was true both early and late.

But even that part fits the larger theme. Vegas wants its goalie making saves from sightlines it can live with, not scrambling through second and third chances around the crease.

Tortorella said there were times the Knights protected that space well and other times they did not. That is another quiet hinge in Game 2. If Vegas owns the front of its net more consistently, the rest of its game gets cleaner.

Emotion matters if it stays useful

Game 1 had the usual playoff noise. There were roughing calls, scrums and plenty of signs that this series can get nasty in a hurry.

Vegas mostly handled that line well. It played with edge, but did not let the game spin away.

Tortorella said Monday that emotion is a big part of playoff hockey, but there is a fine line between useful emotion and sitting in the penalty box. McNabb said much the same thing. The intensity is part of what makes this time of year fun, but discipline still has to sit underneath it.

That is another place where Vegas can shape the series. The Knights want Game 2 hard. They just do not want it sloppy.

What tonight asks

Game 2 does not call for a masterpiece. It calls for a firmer version of the same idea.

Vegas wants the series played below the hash marks, through the faceoff dots and under pressure. It wants Utah defending through contact, not attacking with speed and space. It wants the game to look like work.

If the Golden Knights can get it there earlier, then Game 2 becomes about more than a chance to take a 2-0 lead. It becomes proof that Vegas is not just reacting to the series.

It is defining it.

Up next

The Golden Knights continue their first-round series against the Mammoth in Game 2 on Tuesday at T-Mobile Arena, with puck drop set for 6:30 p.m. PT.

This article first appeared on Dice City Sports and was syndicated with permission.

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

Yardbarker +

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!