Originally posted on Fox Sports West  |  Last updated 6/12/13
Nothing is sports is black and white. We try to make it that way, of course, to say certain decisions are indisputably right and others unequivocally wrong. Thats just how this works. Compartmentalization is king. But still, its hard to know what ligaments will snap and which bones will wear weaker than they should, which temperaments will suit a team and which will set it off. Its impossible to monetize human production in a field thats so dependent on something as fragile as the human body or to assess a teams needs several years in the future. There are good decisions and bad ones, at least in retrospect, but its hard to label things right and wrong in the moment. Which brings us to the NBAs semi-solution to all this, a solution that was introduced in 2005 and expanded in 2011: The amnesty clause. In 2005, with the beginning of a new collective bargaining agreement, teams were allowed to amnesty one player that summer, and only that summer. In doing so, a team would wipe a players contract from their books with regards to the salary cap and luxury tax hits, but it would still have to pay him. It was a way for any team, that summer at least, to get rid of a burdensome contract that looked poised to ruin its financial flexibility for years to come. It was a kind of take-it-or-leave-it quick fix, but in 2011, the new and current CBA added a wrinkle. The amnesty still existed, but this time, each team would have one per CBA. They could use their amnesty whenever they wanted from the conclusion of the 2011 lockout until the CBA ends, either in 2017 if either party opts out or in 2021. The catch, though, is that the amnesty clause can only be applied to contracts signed before the current CBA and for players who remain on the same team that signed them (amnesty rights are not tradeable), which means time is ticking as we inch closer to the 2013-14 season. Its not that teams have to use their amnesty clauses in theory, if theyre well run, they shouldnt have any of these behemoth contracts dragging them down but rather that its an option to be explored. Its not that the amnesty clause was designed to kick terrible players out of the league. Rather, it was put into place to allow teams a mulligan, and the players they overpaid could in theory go on to play again, for another team at a far lower salary. In fact, of the fifteen players amnestied since 2011, only four, James Posey, Charlie Bell, Josh Childress and Ryan Gomes, were not picked up by another team. Granted, just seven of the 15 were actually playing at the end of the 2012-13 season, but among them are names like Chauncey Billups, Chris Andersen and Andray Blatche, all contributors on playoff teams. Its not that amnestied players are by nature terrible, or even that theyre massive salary dumps anymore. Theyre just another way to finagle the system, in some cases, and they can be bit of added flexibility to get rid of a player who in some way doesnt fit. Which in turn brings us to the Lakers, who have been at the center of the amnesty discussion since even before their season ended in the first round of the playoffs. It all started with Kobe Bryants torn Achilles. Theories began to pop up about how the Lakers could amnesty him, in theory, if he were to miss all of the 2013-14 season, and then re-sign him for 2014-15. It sounded crazy, and it likely would be, but still, it would be a viable theory if all parties were on board with it. In fact, the Kobe amnesty plan shouldnt be all that surprising to anyone whos looked around the league at how the clause has been used. In many instances, the term strategic amnesty has cropped up, essentially meaning that teams are using the clause to facilitate deals rather than simply dump big contracts. Teams have found its possible to use their amnesty to create cap space and sign another player, and the contracts being amnestied are hardly the mammoth, 15-20 million per year deals that the league imagined when it invented the clause. The Kobe amnesty would fit neatly into the strategic amnesty concept. Hes the Lakers best player, the face of their franchise, and they in no way want to dump his contract and be done with him. It would be a matter of twisting the amnesty to fit their needs, and its hard to imagine theres ever been better timing in terms of an injury and a contracts expiration that might actually make the thing work. That said, its probably not going to happen, and if the Lakers are going to use their amnesty, theyre going to have to use it this summer. After that, they will have no player on the books who signed before the 2011 lockout, and thus no amnesty candidates. For a team thats so bogged down by expensive contracts and impending luxury tax bills, it would seem wise to use the amnesty, even if the Lakers and the Buss family seem impervious to such mortal concerns as financial stresses. Here, then, are their options, with the exceptions of Bryant, whose case has been laid out above, and Chris Duhon, who can simply be bought out for just 1.5 million: Steve Blake, G, due 4 million next season before becoming a free agent Blake would seem a very unlikely candidate for the amnesty, and not just because his salary is relatively small. (Honestly, for the Lakers, getting any contract off the books would correspond to a much bigger savings that it appears at face value, what with the luxury taxes the team is paying. Tax rates for the Lakers next season will be 1.75 per dollar over the luxury tax threshold.) But beyond the financial aspects of this being a dumb decision, its also not going to happen because of Bryants status. Even though hes saying he wants to be back for opening night, Bryant could easily miss a month or two of action, and Blake, an effective veteran, will be needed to pick up the slack. Pau Gasol, FC, due 19.3 million next season before becoming a free agent By the sheer size of his contract, Gasol seems like the kind of player for whom the amnesty clause was made. Getting rid of his salary would net the team more than twice his salary in savings, but Gasol getting the amnesty is still almost as unlikely as it is Blake. First of all, the Lakers may very well need Gasols skills next season if they cant retain Dwight Howard, and even if they do somehow entice Howard to stay, Gasol still retains enough value to be a decent trade chip. The trade could be a massive salary dump and could return picks and the kind of young, cheap players the team needs to pad its roster next season. Taking all of that into consideration, applying the amnesty to Gasol seems only like it would be a last-ditch and highly improbable outcome. Metta World Peace, GF, due 7.7 million next season if he exercises his player option as expected before becoming a free agent Here, though, is amnesty gold. World Peaces 7.7 million salary his hardly astronomical, but players making far less have been hit with the clause. (Darko Milicic, ladies and gentlemen.) Plus, as was already mentioned, to amnesty World Peace would be to save more than twice his actual salary, and unlike Blake, hes not the most crucial of pieces next season, nor is he the kind of trade piece that would return much. In an ideal world, hed simply decline his player option, but in this situation, World Peace has exactly zero incentive to do so.
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Greg Jennings announces retirement from NFL

Vikings OT Phil Loadholt retires after seven seasons in NFL

Report: Yankees, Cubs in 'final stages' of Chapman trade

Repot: NFL to investigate Aldon Smith over Periscope video

Report: Fitzpatrick got ‘multiple contract offers’ from Jets

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

A-Rod: Ortiz deserves Fenway statue, street named after him

Report: Bosh's camp 'angry and suspicious of Heat's intentions'

JJ Watt pens dramatic letter to fans about back injury

Le’Veon Bell vows to win appeal: ‘I’m not going to miss games’

Dallas Cowboys' team employee bus involved in fatal crash

Aldon Smith posts video under a pseudonym of a blunt on Periscope

Julian Edelman is dating Adriana Lima?

NFL reportedly determines Peyton Manning didn't use PEDs

KD, Draymond Green booed in L.A. during Team USA exhibition

Top storyline for each NFL team heading into training camp

Eight MLB veterans that need to be traded before deadline

Andre the Giant drank six bottles of wine before match?

Cristiano Ronaldo spars with Conor McGregor in gym

Adam Silver is the new standard-bearer for league commisioners

Iowa football player held at gunpoint by police while playing Pokemon Go

Eight most significant injuries going into NFL training camp

Man. U players banned from playing 'Pokemon Go?'

Ken Griffey Jr. put on backwards hat during HOF speech

All Sports News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

One Gotta Go: Do NBA players really love NBA2K?

Effect of ban on Russia could span beyond the Olympic Games

One Gotta Go: NBA players hate Facebook too

QUIZ: Name every city to host the NBA All-Star Game

One Gotta Go: NBA players settle the fast food beef

One Gotta Go: NBA players make tough choices on their favorite rappers

One Gotta Go: NBA Summer League is not about that Game of Thrones life

The top NHL free agents available as offseason winds down

WATCH: NBA jersey sponsors that need to happen

Expansion draft playing heavy hand in the current NHL offseason

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker