Originally posted on Awful Announcing  |  Last updated 11/28/12
It's hard to fathom how a school without a conference, who controls their own schedule, and has its own television deal with NBC could be leaving significant television revenue on the table. But, that's exactly what Notre Dame is doing. In light of the monster ratings ABC pulled in Notre Dame's finale versus USC the question changes from "IS scheduling hurting television revenue" to "HOW much is it hurting them?" At issue here is the fact that Notre Dame by its own choosing, schedules its last game of the year on the road at either Stanford or USC. Going through past schedules and future schedules, those two teams have alternated Notre Dame's last game of the year for quite awhile and into the foreseeable future. Because Stanford and USC host these season finales, those games fall into the Pac 12's television contracts which means it can air on ABC or potentially Fox.  When Stanford and USC play in South Bend, those games take place earlier in the season and fall under Notre Dame's contract with NBC (who airs ND home games).  It's one of the more interesting quirks in sports television. The bottom line is that late season games with big implications have a much higher value and yield higher ratings than early and mid season games that have similar significance. When NBC airs Notre Dame home games versus Stanford and USC earlier in the year, the ceiling for a big ratings numbers is a lot lower. The finality of the outcome coupled with the growing narrative (like ND going to a title game) is just more compelling for a late November broadcast. Notre Dame purposely schedules these end of the season trips to the West Coast and it's a tradition with a lot of back story, history, general branding and recruiting purposes serving as motivation. In a day and age where you have exploding television sports rights deals,  ill conceived sports networks popping up, rivalries dissolving due to realignment,  and questionable conference expansion, you have to wonder if Notre Dame will continue to sacrifice their season finale every year rather than having it as an asset for themselves and NBC. Although the value of Notre Dame's season finale fluctuates quite a bit, the possible impact of the National Championship race pumps the value of that game by a good deal and would increase the amount of any television extension going forward. Think of it this way: This past game had higher ratings than any ABC regular season game since 2006 and all of the BCS bowls other than the BCS Championship last year.  The Orange Bowl just renewed with ESPN for about $55 million a year while the Sugar Bowl will get about $80 million a year from ESPN.  Given Notre Dame's last game bested ratings for those two games, you could make the case that an undefeated or even 1 loss Notre Dame finale versus a ranked Stanford or USC, could be valued in that same $55 million to $80 million range. NBC and other bidders would certainly increase the value of Notre Dame's television deal on the mere chance they could catch that lightning in a bottle every handful of years. Does the value of the west coast finale outweigh the amount of money being on the table? Hard to say, but I'd imagine that coupled with Notre Dame's newly formed relationship with the ACC, the school might begin to revisit their own schedule making in the near future.
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Roger Goodell expectedly dodges Patriots-related questions at Super Bowl

Baltimore Orioles acquire starting pitcher Odrisamer Despaigne

USC athletic director Pat Haden to retire in June

Report: Browns owner ‘frustrated, emotional’ about Johnny Manziel

Raiders and Texans to play MNF game in Mexico City in 2016

Goodell wants to keep Raiders, Chargers in home markets

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Deadly shooting breaks out at Dublin boxing weigh-in

Mike Shula vs. Wade Phillips: The best story of Super Bowl 50

LeBron: ‘I don’t really see a problem’ with Hack-a-Shaq

Report: Asking price 'too steep' for Howard trade to Celtics

Ex-teammate: 'Fair to assume' Lynch done with Seahawks

Steve Young: ‘I’m worried about Matthew’ Stafford

NFL considering moving Pro Bowl to Australia

Joe Montana warns NFL players about potential long-term damage after retirement

Report: Two people fired for leaking Jason Pierre-Paul information

USMNT are big favorites against Canada

‘Crying Jordan’ photographer had no idea it existed until this week

NHL nightmare: No Canadian teams in the NHL playoff hunt

Seven unheralded players set to make major impacts in SB 50

‘Actor’ Todd Gurley wants to make ‘billions’

The 14 biggest plays in Super Bowl history

David Price donates $300K to build field for special needs kids

J.R. Smith pulls a Marshawn on 3-point contest slight

Tom Brady has clock counting down to Super Bowl LI

QUIZ: Name the winning starting quarterback from every Super Bowl

All Sports News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

The 14 biggest plays in Super Bowl history

Manziel's father fears for QB's life

Johnny Manziel dropped by agent

Michael Irvin: Cowboys should save Manziel

QUIZ: Name the Super Bowl halftime performers since 1991

The merits of trading Blake Griffin to the Hornets

X-factors in Super Bowl 50

Could the Marlins contend in 2016?

Report: Browns to cut Manziel in March

Browns rip Manziel in statement

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker