Yardbarker
x
Sports & Politics Intersect: Racism leading World Cup into dangerous play
Jimmy Durmaz of Sweden reacts during the 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia group F match between Germany and Sweden at Fisht Stadium on June 23, 2018 in Sochi, Russia. Durmaz says he was targeted by fans after the loss to Germany.  Simon Hofmann - FIFA/FIFA via Getty Images

Sports & Politics Intersect: World Cup heading to dangerous play as racist incidents continue

"F--- racism." - The Swedish national team

"I am Swedish and I am proud to be wearing this shirt and our flag. We stand united. We are Sweden.” - Jimmy Durmaz, midfielder, Swedish national team

The group stage of the World Cup has concluded. On the field, the biggest storyline is Germany, the defending world champions, not making it to the next round for the first time since 1938. Off the field, it's been the prevalence of racism at the tournament.

Following his team's 2-1 loss to Germany last Saturday in which he committed the foul that resulted in the winning goal for Die Mannschaft, Swedish midfielder Jimmy Durmaz, who was born to Assyrian parents, claimed that he was on the receiving end of racist verbal abuse and that he and his family had received death threats

"[To] be called ‘bloody darkie’ and ‘suicide killer,’ and for my family, my children, to have death threats ... that is completely unacceptable," Durmaz told the media, with his fellow Swedish teammates and coaches behind him offering support. 

The animosity towards Durmaz appears to have disappeared after Sweden trounced Mexico, the most popular national team in America, 3-0. Despite their loss, the Mexican national team made it through to the round of 16 thanks to South Korea's shocking 2-0 victory over Germany. Two Telemundo television hosts celebrated El Tri's rescue by doing a racist slant-eyed gesture with their hands. Both personalities were suspended indefinitely shortly thereafter.

Elsewhere, Australian fans are claiming that they weren't being racist when they taunted Peru's Luis Advincula (he's Afro-Latino) when the two sides faced off, alleging that they were merely booing him and not simulating monkey sounds every time Advincula touched the ball. 

But it wasn't just racism rearing its ugly head — homophobia and long standing political and historical tensions also made an appearance.

The Argentine soccer federation was fined after the fans of the Albicelestes resorted to violence and homophobic chants following their embarrassing 3-0 loss to Croatia. Diego Maradona, a living god in the South American country, didn't make things any better after flipping the bird to Nigerian fans. (Oh, and who could forget the time Maradona did the same racist gesture that got the two Telemundo hosts suspended?)

Elsewhere, Liverpool star Mo Salah is threatening to quit the Egyptian national team over the Chechnya debacle, and Switzerland's Granit Xhaka and Xherdan Shaqiri were fined for celebrating their goals over Serbia by doing a hand gesture that resembled the Albanian two-headed eagle — a nod to the tumultuous history between Albanians and Serbians. For their part, Serbians were reportedly more upset about the refereeing than the celebrations.

Locally, Hope Solo, one of the few U.S. athletes that can claim to be a World Cup winner, put the U.S. Soccer Federation on blast, claiming that they had helped turn the beautiful game into a "rich, white kid sport," and that the pay-to-play system is exclusionary of young athletes of color. It's worth pointing out that the U.S. men's national team has already pushed two U.S. born players to play for Mexico.

We are near the halfway point of the tournament and so much has happened already. Don't be surprised if next week you read yet another recap of what's been transpiring in Russia.

Need to know now: 

This week in sports and politics history: The Supreme Court gives college sports television rights back to the schools


University of Georgia/Collegiate Images/Getty Images

“My general observation is that you are going to see a lot more college football games on television in addition to the games carried on the national networks. They may be carried by individual local stations, by regional or even larger ad hoc networks and on cable television.”  - J. Laurent Scharff, who represented the Association of Independent Television Stations in a friend-of-the-court brief 

So many of the issues surrounding the NCAA and more than $1 billion in revenue that it brought in during the 2017 fiscal year can be traced back to a 1984 court ruling that stated that the NCAA violated Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts. 

At the time, the NCAA had been in control of the rights to televising all football games, a practice that limited the number of times any given school could receive air time in a two-year span. Because of the NCAA’s control, individual schools could not negotiate their own television contracts lest they be removed from the NCAA.

ABC and CBS paid a $131.7 million each for the rights to broadcast 35 college football games per season. Major schools like Oklahoma and Georgia would receive $600,000 for a national telecast, money that they would have to share with their conference. 

Instead of continuing to comply with the NCAA’s terms, Oklahoma and Georgia decided to sue the NCAA, believing that schools would be able to bring in more revenue to through their football programs to help fund other athletic programs if they were allowed to pursue their own television deals. Major programs were receiving less in fees rights than what they would on the open market; smaller programs were receiving more. 

The courts ruled in favor of Oklahoma and Georgia, 7-2, and we’re still seeing the effects of the ruling today. There isn’t anything governing how college football television deals are made today. Most major conferences have their own networks through major players like ESPN and FOX Sports, but huge schools like Texas have networks all on their own, creating a ridiculous competitive advantage.

SEC schools were making more than $17 million per year back in 2010, and in 2017, the Big 10 signed a huge deal that would pay the conference a combined $440M per year from Fox Sports, ESPN and CBS — and that is expected to grow as the years pass. All of this money is going to those who need it the least, of course. The Big 10 had five of the top 14 paid coaches in college football at the time. None of the money, naturally, is going to the athletes. 

While it was a monumental ruling at the time that prevented the NCAA from exploiting the schools, it just led to exploitation in other areas and increased corruption because of the amount of money at stake in any given season. 

More must-reads:

Customize Your Newsletter

+

Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.