Originally posted on Fox Sports South  |  Last updated 11/13/12
Glancing through a cracked locker room door Saturday night in Tuscaloosa, there was no remorse on R. Bowen Loftins face. He was posing for pictures with Texas A&Ms padded stunners, grinning. If anyone in SEC country was expecting an apology from the bow-tied university president or anyone else associated with the Aggies program after all, they had just completed the largest obstacle to the conferences six-year streak of BCS titles it was not forthcoming. They did not apologize for what must feel, to SEC enthusiasts, like cruel irony. Just three months earlier, Texas A&M was not competitive enough for the nations preeminent conference, predicted to simply dilute the on-field product. Now, after upsetting formerly top-ranked Alabama 29-24, the Aggies are too good. At 8-2, Texas A&M is one of eight SEC teams already bowl eligible. The problem: Every SEC team now has a loss. Which brings up the question: Will too much competitive balance prove to be detrimental to SEC football? Its a strange inquiry, but relevant in the present tense. There are three bowl-eligible undefeated teams remaining nationally Kansas State, Oregon and Notre Dame each with a leg up in the BCS standings over No. 4 Alabama and the multitude of SEC teams behind it. If any of the two teams above the SEC remain unbeaten, the SEC will be excluded from the national title game for the first time since 2005. But even without an SEC team competing for BCS bragging rights at this seasons end and thats working under the far-too-risky assumption that two of the top three teams will avoid an upset in the coming weeks it is shortsighted to assume the conference hurt itself in conference realignment. Loftin owes no apology; Commissioner Mike Slive deserves no flack. Texas A&Ms disruptive effect on the 2012 season only strengthens an unwavering truth: Slives league is set up for a future of prosperity, both on and off the field. To make a judgment based on any outcome this season is to miss the point entirely. This faulty system of deciding a champion will soon be cast to the side for another (less faulty) system of deciding a champion. The BCS is dead following the January 2014 championship meeting. A four-team playoff will follow. And if that playoff structure were in place today, the most dominant force in college football (still the SEC) would be included which still misses the point. As conference commissioners met in Denver on Monday, the next step toward finalizing the new playoff system was agreed upon: Rotation of six access bowls for the semifinals, a national championship site bid out like the Super Bowl, one automatic bid for the Group of Five conferences (Big East, Conference USA, Mountain West, Sun Belt, Mid-American) and money. Lots of money. Billions. The Southeastern Conference, with its two contract bowl deals and conference depth, is smack dab in the middle of a goldmine, thanks in no small part to leagues competitive balance. As reported by the SportsBusiness Journal, ESPN is closing in on a 12-year, 7.3 billion deal to exclusively televise the new playoff format. The SEC, Big 12, Big 10, ACC and Pac-12 are set to receive the biggest cuts of the deal, with additional revenue coming for each team placed in the national semifinals and six major bowl games (Rose, Sugar, Orange and, reportedly, Fiesta, Chick-fil-A and Cotton). Looking at this seasons current standings, guess which conference is in position to make out with the most lucrative portion of the deal? And Texas A&M is supposed to apologize for providing the SEC with another top-tier team? Judging by the current BCS top-25 an imprecise, yet decent indicator of what the new formats selection committee could project the SEC has six of the top nine teams in the country, Nos. 4 through 9. If the four-team playoff were selected today, Alabama andor Georgia could be national semifinalists. In all, three or four conference teams would earn a spot in the six major bowls, and then watch the money pile up. Because in the end thats what conference realignment and the new playoff system and everything in else in sports revolves around: The bottom line. Bringing in Texas A&M was less a move toward competitive balance than it was toward Lonestar TV sets. Loftin and the Aggies saw a way out of the Texas Longhorns shadow; Slive and his universities saw an additional 20-odd million eyeballs to showcase their premier gridiron product. It just so happened that that product shook up the national championship race Saturday. Panic struck SEC supporters in the aftermath of the Bryant-Denny stunner: The league has too many elite teams (practically impossible in the upcoming format), Texas A&M will begin to wreak havoc with hand-selected Texas recruits (false, so false) and the leagues fall from grace was set in motion by conference realignment (SEC schools are poised for a wildly prosperous future on and off the field). The rumors of the SECs demise were not only exaggerated, they were fabricated entirely. Even if R. Bowen Loftin and the Aggies were posing for photos commemorating the end of their conferences six-year rein of BCS terror again, theres still a lot of football left to play the future of the SEC remains bright. And green. Say cheese.
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Warren Sapp bitten on arm by shark

Fitzpatrick, Jets agree to one-year deal

Baker considering removing Papelbon from closer role?

Greg Hardy struggling to find work, reportedly even in CFL

Jets players told not to discuss Ryan Fitzpatrick situation


Brock Lesnar won't be punished by WWE for UFC drug test

Report: Cowboys to be fined up to $250K for suspended players

Data shows NFL-backed youth program that claimed reduced concussions is bogus

Report: Odom’s family working hard to get him to go to rehab

Drug dealers adding Olympic rings to cocaine wrappers in Rio

Report: Cowboys have ‘no interest’ in Freeney, Hardy

Poll: Las Vegas residents don’t support public funds for NFL stadium

Conor McGregor talks trash to Nate Diaz on ‘Conan’

We asked Team USA: What other Olympic sport would you play?

Real Madrid can’t train at Norwegian school because of the kids

Newspaper uses Michael Jordan ‘crying face’ as image

Equipment manager Blake Griffin punched no longer works for Clippers

Report: Nicks signing one-year deal with Saints

Reds 'picking up the pace' on Jay Bruce trade talks

Robbie Keane rescued on highway after running out of gas

Why Gary Bettman's CTE denial is cause for concern for NHL

WATCH: Tigers play high stakes game of Rock, Paper, Scissors

Tavares dismisses rumors, wants to stay with Islanders

All Sports News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

We asked Team USA: What other Olympic sport would you play?

Why Gary Bettman's CTE denial is cause for concern for NHL

WATCH: Inside the Nike SNKRS BOX in SF for Golden Air Celebration

WATCH: Five other uniforms Chris Sale should cut up

QUIZ: Name every Olympic event in which the USA has never won a gold medal

Five U.S. Olympians favored to win multiple gold medals

WATCH: What teams should join the Big 12?

One Gotta Go: Do NBA players really love NBA2K?

One Gotta Go: NBA players hate Facebook too

One Gotta Go: NBA players settle the fast food beef

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Follow Yardbarker