Originally posted on Monkey with a Halo  |  Last updated 6/27/12

Earlier this week, Fangraphs posted this article wondering why it is first basemen are paid so much more relative to WAR than other positions.  There's a lot of interesting discussion in the piece on the causality of all that, but what really got me thinking is the first table showing the millions of dollars per WAR by defensive position.  Specifically, it got me thinking about Mark Trumbo.

Mark Trumbo is nominally a first baseman, but that is a thing of the past thanks to Albert Pujols.  That's good news because according to that post, first basemen are very high-priced.  As it currently stands, Mark is now a left fielder, he's a work in progress there, but that is where he is going to play most of his games for the rest of this season.  That's not so good news because, as the chart shows, left fielders are also very expensive, in fact, more expensive per WAR than first basemen.

What we don't know is what the future holds for Trumbo's primary defensive designation.  Fortunately, the Angels have several years to figure that out before Trumbo hits the open market.  But it is a problem worth thinking about now because if he keeps hitting like he is this season, he is going to be in line for a massive payday.  But the exact size of that payday looks like it might be something the Angels can manipulate depending on what position on the field they lock him into.

We all saw how poorly Mark Trumbo's transition to third base went early on in this season, but after looking at that $/WAR chart, there is a great deal of financial sense in revisiting the experiment.  For whatever reason, GMs aren't throwing big money at third basemen, although part of that could be that there has been a relative dearth of talent at the hot corner the last few years.  Nonetheless, it does look like there is something of a market inefficiency that the Halos could take advantage of while also plugging a roster hole at the same time.

Simplifying down from all the sabermetrics in the article, I would posit that if Trumbo were to continue producing as a top slugger who is a below average defender at third base rather than as a below average defender in left field, the Angels could save several million dollars when it comes time to lock Trumbo into a long-term contract.  GMs don't seem to care so much about defense in left field but they do at third base.  In other words, if he is costing the team runs in the field at third, it is going to decrease his value much more than if he is costing the team runs in left field.  Judging by the disparity in the $/WAR numbers that difference in defensive value could be more than enough to offset the relative scarcity of bats as potent as Trumbo's that can play third base.

Therein lies the rub though.  Getting Trumbo to become even a below average third baseman seems like a tall order.  While he showed promise in spring training, he was an unmitigated disaster once the regular season started.  However, and this might be the cognitive dissonance talking, a fractured foot kept him from prepping for the shift across the diamond during the off-season.  Give him a full off-season to learn the position and maybe he can actually get good enough to fake it at third.

But that is only part of the problem, the other complication is that the Angels would have to be willing to sacrifice runs on the field in order to artificially deflate Trumbo's perceived value all for the sake of getting him to sign a five-year, $80 million contract instead of a five-year, $88 million after the 2016 season.  That's some pretty hardcore long-term planning right there.  However, it does come with the pleasant side effect of the Angels maximizing their current roster by plugging the hole at third, for which no legit prospect is within two seasons of occupying, and once again clearing the path for Peter Bourjos to play everyday.

I don't know, maybe I am misinterpreting the findings from the original article, in which case having Trumbo play third would only make him more expensive.  Or maybe Trumbo just ends up having such a special bat that he will get paid top dollar regardless of the position he plays.  It is even possible that there is no need to manipulate his value since he seems like a prime candidate to take a hometown (literally) discount.  Or maybe his plate discipline begins to erode and by the time he hits free agency he is no longer worth locking up (sorry, but the possibility has to be mentioned).

Whatever the case, I have the feeling that this whole exercise, while well intentioned, is based on a bad premise.  The notion that the Angels would make a major decision like what defensive position one of their young stars will play based off of future potential financial savings rather than what is best for the team in terms of winning games doesn't seem to jive the way Mike Scioscia, Jerry Dipoto or Arte Moreno operates.

[follow]

GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

Adrian Peterson works out with Jameis Winston, gets Dirk Koetter’s attention

Report: Martavis Bryant reinstatement ‘imminent’

Warriors provide update on Kevin Durant, who could play this season

Report: CBS wants Tony Romo to replace Phil Simms

Griffin to wear shoes designed by young leukemia patient

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Jack Del Rio frustrated Raiders can’t provide support to Aldon Smith

Bengals owner admits he could be ‘overtolerant’ with Pacman Jones

Rumor: Panthers trying to acquire No. 2 pick from 49ers

Mets closer Jeurys Familia suspended 15 games for domestic violence incident

Yankees slugger Aaron Judge won’t make Opening Day roster?

Arkansas fears new gun law could threaten SEC membership

The 'So, is this the last ride for the Dead Man?' quiz

2016 MLB playoff teams that won't make it back this season

Box Score 3/29: Free hats (Caps fans only)

The 'Are you mentally prepared for 'One Shining Moment'?' quiz

NBA Referee Hotline Bling: Serge Ibaka can't connect

Can the Padres' Christian Bethancourt really succeed at pitcher and catcher?

The Raiders will forever belong to Oakland

The Rewind: George Mason's improbable run to the Final Four

Box Score 3/28: Wilt's last game

Baseball movies you can stream now to hold you over until Opening Day

Best, worst and hard to stomach MLB offseason moves

The 28 craziest ballpark foods for the 2017 season

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

The 'So, is this the last ride for the Dead Man?' quiz

2016 MLB playoff teams that won't make it back this season

The 'Are you mentally prepared for 'One Shining Moment'?' quiz

NBA Referee Hotline Bling: Serge Ibaka can't connect

Can the Padres' Christian Bethancourt really succeed at pitcher and catcher?

The Raiders will forever belong to Oakland

Best, worst and hard to stomach MLB offseason moves

The Rewind: George Mason's improbable run to the Final Four

Baseball movies you can stream now to hold you over until Opening Day

Best of Yardbarker: Did Team USA's victory save the World Baseball Classic?

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker