Originally posted on Brewers Bar  |  Last updated 5/26/13
(Photo: Milwaukee County Sheriff/AP) Yesterday, JSOnline’s Don Walker reported that Yovani Gallardo pled no contest to DUI – or operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated if you want to get technical.  Gallardo’s blood alcohol content was 0.22, easily exceeding the legal limit of 0.08. Whenever a celebrity gets arrested, there is often speculation that they won’t have the same criminal justice experience as regular folks would.  At first blush, it seems that Gallardo’s sentence isn’t anything exceptional: According to online court records, Gallardo was fined $865 and will lose his driver's license for seven months. In addition, Gallardo will have to use an ignition interlock device for a period of one year. Such devices, which require the user to exhale into it like a breathalyzer, is required in Wisconsin for first offense operating while intoxicated offenders with an alcohol concentration of 0.15 or higher. Although it doesn’t appear that Gallardo is getting special treatment, it begs the question – is ordinary treatment appropriate?  Is suspending a driver’s license for seven months suitable punishment for a first offense? One presumes Gallardo won’t have any trouble getting a ride to work during those seven months.  That might not be so easy for the average person.  Taking the bus to work, or having to get a ride from a friend-colleague-spouse would be an inconvenience at best, and more likely a serious burden.  What about people who have young children in day care?  Is taking the bus a reasonable option for them? What about running errands?  Everyone needs to go grocery shopping, pick their kids up from school, and do all sorts of other chores that require driving.  Not everyone is going to be able to find alternate transportation for these kinds of activities for seven whole months.  I would guess most folks in those circumstances are going to drive anyway, even with a suspended license.  They’ve been put in a position where their easiest option is to break the law. If the purpose is to discourage drunken driving, a several hundred dollar fine is enough for a first offense (which I understand is $300 – Gallardo was subject to additional fines for his level of intoxication and lane deviation).  The law should assume that it was a one-time lapse in judgment.  Penalties like suspending a driver’s license or requiring an ignition interlock device are more appropriate for repeat offenders.  But for a first offense they are excessive. Certainly, none of these penalties for a first offense will be especially onerous for someone in Gallardo’s position.  As for the rest of us, it’s easy to see how they could be needlessly disruptive, and even encourage additional law-breaking – which would not make the general public better protected from drunk drivers.  If the law isn’t going to make us safer, it’s a pretty lousy law.
GET THE YARDBARKER APP:
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45
MORE FROM YARDBARKER

David Stern: Lakers could have had Chris Paul, GM panicked

Brandon Jacobs vows to 'expose' Jim Harbugh, get him fired

Mike Zimmer won’t retire even if right eye goes blind

Kevin Love responds to Draymond Green’s ‘annihilation’ trash talk

Spike Lee deletes Instagram post saying Kaepernick signed with Seattle

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE?
GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER:

Errol Spence is the real deal, takes down Kell Brook

Indians reveal Frank Robinson statue at Progressive Field

Report: Jerry West considered rejoining the Lakers before they hired Magic Johnson

The NHL is thinking about hosting an outdoor game in Nashville

Michael Vick in talks to retire with Falcons

Hall of Fame pitcher and former U.S. Senator Jim Bunning passes away at 85

Journey to the Stanley Cup Final: Pittsburgh Penguins

Best of Yardbarker: Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines

The 'More like Whiffer, Texas Ranger...amirite?' quiz

The Rewind: Vince Carter's graduation day celebration that wasn't

Manu Ginobili gave life to the San Antonio Spurs

Stanley Cup Final: A David vs. Goliath matchup that's not as lopsided as it may appear

Why the Indianapolis 500 is called 'the greatest spectacle in racing'

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Box Score 5/26: Bring on the Finals

Why wait? Our too soon Cavaliers-Warriors NBA Finals preview

Kicking It: East is East, and West is West

Three Up, Three Down: Some surprises way out (NL) West

MLB News
Delivered to your inbox
You'll also receive Yardbarker's daily Top 10, featuring the best sports stories from around the web. Customize your newsletter to get articles on your favorite sports and teams. And the best part? It's free!

By clicking "Sign Me Up", you have read and agreed to the Fox Sports Digital Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can opt out at any time. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.
the YARDBARKER app
Get it now!
Ios_download En_app_rgb_wo_45

Journey to the Stanley Cup Final: Pittsburgh Penguins

Best of Yardbarker: Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines

The 'More like Whiffer, Texas Ranger...amirite?' quiz

Stanley Cup Final: A David vs. Goliath matchup that's not as lopsided as it may appear

Manu Ginobili gave life to the San Antonio Spurs

The Rewind: Vince Carter's graduation day celebration that wasn't

The 10 best sports docs available for streaming

Kicking It: East is East, and West is West

Three Up, Three Down: Some surprises way out (NL) West

The 'Let's go to the videotape!' quiz

Today's Best Stuff
For Publishers
Company Info
Help
Follow Yardbarker